by oldeagle » Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:29 pm
by Shark_Hunter » Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:12 pm
by Tony Clifton » Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:24 pm
by Shark_Hunter » Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:10 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:How are the one day games worked out anyway? Main program is easy - play everyone once. Rotate two games forward. Twenty20 it seems that you play your neighbouring clubs usually, especially for twilight games.
Is the one day competition on some sort of rotation too?
by heater31 » Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:56 pm
beeroclock wrote:I hope No.12 for Adelaide was a fill in for someone not available.
Batted about 6. That was not a grade standard.
Maybe he's a bowler.
by beeroclock » Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:22 pm
heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:I hope No.12 for Adelaide was a fill in for someone not available.
Batted about 6. That was not a grade standard.
Maybe he's a bowler.
Looking at yesterday's results your club's investment in Ross Whiteley seems to have already paid off. Apart from him it appears the 10 other players at Prospect have the same ability as number 12 did.....
by heater31 » Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:39 pm
beeroclock wrote:heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:I hope No.12 for Adelaide was a fill in for someone not available.
Batted about 6. That was not a grade standard.
Maybe he's a bowler.
Looking at yesterday's results your club's investment in Ross Whiteley seems to have already paid off. Apart from him it appears the 10 other players at Prospect have the same ability as number 12 did.....
Don't know how you figure that one out.
Only 6 batted.
What's your issue I only pointed out one player didn't look that good and your having a sook.
Anyway Prospect bowled and fielded really well and the spinners put the screws on mid innings.
That's two more players that had an impact. So there were only eight passengers![]()
If you wanna have a stupid un warranted crack then I will have one too.
When your bats get so many fullies from slower bowlers then teach them not to hit them straight to fielders.
That's just dumb.
by beeroclock » Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:54 pm
heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:heater31 wrote:beeroclock wrote:I hope No.12 for Adelaide was a fill in for someone not available.
Batted about 6. That was not a grade standard.
Maybe he's a bowler.
Looking at yesterday's results your club's investment in Ross Whiteley seems to have already paid off. Apart from him it appears the 10 other players at Prospect have the same ability as number 12 did.....
Don't know how you figure that one out.
Only 6 batted.
What's your issue I only pointed out one player didn't look that good and your having a sook.
Anyway Prospect bowled and fielded really well and the spinners put the screws on mid innings.
That's two more players that had an impact. So there were only eight passengers![]()
If you wanna have a stupid un warranted crack then I will have one too.
When your bats get so many fullies from slower bowlers then teach them not to hit them straight to fielders.
That's just dumb.
Same could be said for you.
For the record I didn't play but was there most of the day and from where I stood without Ross Whiteley you blokes are in the same boat as Adelaide. Up the creek with out a paddle.
With the pre season issues that we have had as a club this season I'm surprised we even got over a 100.
by heater31 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:05 pm
by Shark_Hunter » Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:09 am
by heater31 » Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:25 am
Shark_Hunter wrote:Hope you've got lights for that Heater! Past experience shows that trying to play T20s at this time of year has the team batting 2nd facing the last 5 or so overs in the dark, even with a 4:45pm start. Surely the Adelaide coach agreed to it - must have seen some benefit for the players involved.
by Lame Choice » Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:58 am
by beeroclock » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:18 am
Lame Choice wrote:5 teenagers named for WT tommorow, including Capt. Start of a new era.
by helicopterking » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:48 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:54 pm
by Power From Port » Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:21 pm
by Tony Clifton » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:01 am
Power From Port wrote:Having a look at the team lists on the SACA website and it has D Worrall in the C Grade for Kensington.
Surely not
by Tony Clifton » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:05 am
beeroclock wrote:Lame Choice wrote:5 teenagers named for WT tommorow, including Capt. Start of a new era.
Fair effort.
Prospect have 3 kids playing C Grade today that still have two years of U/16 cricket up their sleeves. One has 3 and is only 13 and is four foot high WTF.
by Footy Smart » Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:24 am
Tony Clifton wrote:Power From Port wrote:Having a look at the team lists on the SACA website and it has D Worrall in the C Grade for Kensington.
Surely not
Must be injured surely
by heater31 » Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:40 am
Footy Smart wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Power From Port wrote:Having a look at the team lists on the SACA website and it has D Worrall in the C Grade for Kensington.
Surely not
Must be injured surely
Shoulder injury I believe he opened up made 96.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |