Para District Cricket Association 2008/2009

[creekers]

sounds like you getting abit emotional mp man........definately not me
match winners are important yes........but look at who is in the four
do they have the most depth.........ahhh yes
thats why they are called powerhouses of the competition...if you don't have the cattle you aren't gonna win games
you could put a ratters in an atco team and i bet your bottom dollar they wouldn't be in the finals!!
thats because there second tier players don't measure upto the standard....if however they go out and improve themselves by setting goals and have continuous improvement i bet you any money they would be much more competitive!!
leadership is also important, skips and coaches have big roles in doing such things as keeping stability in a group, feedback, setting goals and improving
group morale
i bet you any money mp man, if you were in a set up of a team with more depth
then just a few guns you would put money on the the team who play as a team and have good team morale!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[cantbatcantbowl]

ok mp man, good to see you agree with me on something..........
ok fair point good playes can win a game no doubt
but think about the four teams remaining and you tell me who has the best
balance of batters and bowling....and overall depth
give me your tip for glory once you have thought about it and why???

Creekers if i go by my thinking i would back eaither Sandy or Two wells.
My reasons they all have good cricketers but they have 2or 3 blokes that can turn a game on it's ear!!
They have players with the X factor in which i belive you need to win Finals and than Grand finals.
Not all finals go to plan and these sought of blokes are 9/10 the reason's.. They lift when needed!!
Hope that's clear enough for you!!!!!

at the end of the day its whoever plays the better game on the day... if all 22 individuals played to there best the team that is best on paper would win every game.. so it all ways comes down to 1 or 2 individuals to win you a game whether it is a good run out or a super catch or a ton or 5 wickets and some teams are lucky to have a diff 1 or 2 doing it every week... not to many games are won on a complete team effort.. over a season is when you can say it was a team effort.. we finished out of the 4 so we can say it wasnt a good team effort overall

So all in all in comes back to my point in saying match winners win games for there sides!!!

Ur thoughts on this now Creekers!!!!

creekers has talked some shit on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master

[Well run]

sounds like you getting abit emotional mp man........definately not me
match winners are important yes........but look at who is in the four
do they have the most depth.........ahhh yes
thats why they are called powerhouses of the competition...if you don't have the cattle you aren't gonna win games
you could put a ratters in an atco team and i bet your bottom dollar they wouldn't be in the finals!!
thats because there second tier players don't measure upto the standard....if however they go out and improve themselves by setting goals and have continuous improvement i bet you any money they would be much more competitive!!
leadership is also important, skips and coaches have big roles in doing such things as keeping stability in a group, feedback, setting goals and improving
group morale
i bet you any money mp man, if you were in a set up of a team with more depth
then just a few guns you would put money on the the team who play as a team and have good team morale!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ur getting a little off the beaten track now mate!!!
Again im happy to read ur opinioin... I guess you are someone though so we should all take it that ur right!!!

[Well run]

creekers has talked some s***t on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master [/quote]

Don't always want to be right just always want to give an opinion when asked!!!

[cantbatcantbowl]

creekers has talked some s***t on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master

Don't always want to be right just always want to give an opinion when asked!!![/quote]

your opinion most times is a good one... it just seems that sometimes its your way or the highway!!!

[cantbatcantbowl]

sounds like you getting abit emotional mp man........definately not me
match winners are important yes........but look at who is in the four
do they have the most depth.........ahhh yes
thats why they are called powerhouses of the competition...if you don't have the cattle you aren't gonna win games
you could put a ratters in an atco team and i bet your bottom dollar they wouldn't be in the finals!!
thats because there second tier players don't measure upto the standard....if however they go out and improve themselves by setting goals and have continuous improvement i bet you any money they would be much more competitive!!
leadership is also important, skips and coaches have big roles in doing such things as keeping stability in a group, feedback, setting goals and improving
group morale
i bet you any money mp man, if you were in a set up of a team with more depth
then just a few guns you would put money on the the team who play as a team and have good team morale!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i didnt think you had that in you creekers after some of the crap that has come out of your mouth lately...
salisbury west have been so succesfull over the years because of its depth and professionalism that goes into all there teams evry year..

[Well run]

creekers has talked some s***t on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master

Don't always want to be right just always want to give an opinion when asked!!!

your opinion most times is a good one... it just seems that sometimes its your way or the highway!!![/quote]

I value ur opinion...
So how do teams such as Two Wells go when they have 2 teams!!!
Where is the depth there!!! My argue ment was that players that turn games in this comp do it alot..
Im not saying put a ratters in with atco and things will change!!!!
He does need support but players that can change a game are priceless in this comp!!!!

[Lightning McQueen]

According to the stats, Virginia isn't as much of a two-man team as most have suggested, Patty, Warren and Zito have been handy contributors at times along with Tsimiklis. Someone also mentioned that Stama has had a sh!t year, nearly 400 runs and over 20 wickets, there's a lot players in the PDCA that would be pretty happy with that in div. 1.

[Well run]

According to the stats, Virginia isn't as much of a two-man team as most have suggested, Patty, Warren and Zito have been handy contributors at times along with Tsimiklis. Someone also mentioned that Stama has had a sh!t year, nearly 400 runs and over 20 wickets, there's a lot players in the PDCA that would be pretty happy with that in div. 1.

Fair call LM
Stama is one of these blokes who can change a game bat and ball... Take last season's GF for example!!!!

[cantbatcantbowl]

creekers has talked some s***t on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master

Don't always want to be right just always want to give an opinion when asked!!!

your opinion most times is a good one... it just seems that sometimes its your way or the highway!!!

I value ur opinion...
So how do teams such as Two Wells go when they have 2 teams!!!
Where is the depth there!!! My argue ment was that players that turn games in this comp do it alot..
Im not saying put a ratters in with atco and things will change!!!!
He does need support but players that can change a game are priceless in this comp!!!! [/quote]

when i played against two wells 16 years ago they didnt have depth!! and had to spend money in recent years to achieve that depth..
take westies they have always managed to put a very good side on the park[with out money] all because of there depth..
you put the 2 guns from each team that i mentioned in a earlier post from the top 4 sides and put them in the bottom 4 sides and you are going to see a massive improvement...

[Well run]

creekers has talked some s***t on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master

Don't always want to be right just always want to give an opinion when asked!!!

your opinion most times is a good one... it just seems that sometimes its your way or the highway!!!

I value ur opinion...
So how do teams such as Two Wells go when they have 2 teams!!!
Where is the depth there!!! My argue ment was that players that turn games in this comp do it alot..
Im not saying put a ratters in with atco and things will change!!!!
He does need support but players that can change a game are priceless in this comp!!!!

when i played against two wells 16 years ago they didnt have depth!! and had to spend money in recent years to achieve that depth..
take westies they have always managed to put a very good side on the park[with out money] all because of there depth..
you put the 2 guns from each team that i mentioned in a earlier post from the top 4 sides and put them in the bottom 4 sides and you are going to see a massive improvement...[/quote]

Def agree!!!

[cantbatcantbowl]

According to the stats, Virginia isn't as much of a two-man team as most have suggested, Patty, Warren and Zito have been handy contributors at times along with Tsimiklis. Someone also mentioned that Stama has had a sh!t year, nearly 400 runs and over 20 wickets, there's a lot players in the PDCA that would be pretty happy with that in div. 1.

have played alot against stama and he would be the first to agree that he has had a average year...
maybe i should of not used the word crap.. my mistake..

[Lightning McQueen]

According to the stats, Virginia isn't as much of a two-man team as most have suggested, Patty, Warren and Zito have been handy contributors at times along with Tsimiklis. Someone also mentioned that Stama has had a sh!t year, nearly 400 runs and over 20 wickets, there's a lot players in the PDCA that would be pretty happy with that in div. 1.

have played alot against stama and he would be the first to agree that he has had a average year...
maybe i should of not used the word crap.. my mistake..

I suppose that's what happens when you set such a high standard.

[catchit]

According to the stats, Virginia isn't as much of a two-man team as most have suggested, Patty, Warren and Zito have been handy contributors at times along with Tsimiklis. Someone also mentioned that Stama has had a sh!t year, nearly 400 runs and over 20 wickets, there's a lot players in the PDCA that would be pretty happy with that in div. 1.

have played alot against stama and he would be the first to agree that he has had a average year...
maybe i should of not used the word crap.. my mistake..

i reckon he would agree with that.. as he would say the season is not over yet

[catchit]

creekers has talked some s***t on here but one thing he says is right is you seem to want to be right all the time master..
no i in team master

Don't always want to be right just always want to give an opinion when asked!!!

your opinion most times is a good one... it just seems that sometimes its your way or the highway!!!

I value ur opinion...
So how do teams such as Two Wells go when they have 2 teams!!!
Where is the depth there!!! My argue ment was that players that turn games in this comp do it alot..
Im not saying put a ratters in with atco and things will change!!!!
He does need support but players that can change a game are priceless in this comp!!!!

when i played against two wells 16 years ago they didnt have depth!! and had to spend money in recent years to achieve that depth..
take westies they have always managed to put a very good side on the park[with out money] all because of there depth..
you put the 2 guns from each team that i mentioned in a earlier post from the top 4 sides and put them in the bottom 4 sides and you are going to see a massive improvement...[/quote]

some would say money well spent

[catchit]

Back to the medal.... Sibs would get the 3 votes in 95% of our wins this year..

You dont even need to go back and check the games to know that!

I would assume that Leo would be the same at Virginia?

my money is on sibb..

[catchit]

Nice pic catchit... Is this a sign of things to come??

yeah mate just between you and me i think we can go all the way

[catchit]

Semi Final tips

Sandy's to bat first and make 200 to 220 and have westies 1 or 2 down at stumps.
Westies then to fall short by 30 runs

Virginia to bat first and make 150 with Wells 1 for 40 at stumps.
Wells to make score 3 or 4 down.

Wells to host Sandy's in GF
What a GF it could be between the heavy weights

that would be nice..there would be a few blokes keen to do well which would be a great contest..

[saveyourlegs]

Back to the medal.... Sibs would get the 3 votes in 95% of our wins this year..

You dont even need to go back and check the games to know that!

I would assume that Leo would be the same at Virginia?

my money is on sibb..

I don't mind having a punt either every now and then, my money also on sib..

[catchit]

Back to the medal.... Sibs would get the 3 votes in 95% of our wins this year..

You dont even need to go back and check the games to know that!

I would assume that Leo would be the same at Virginia?

my money is on sibb..

I don't mind having a punt either every now and then, my money also on sib..

you have prob got 50 on 5 players