SA Footy

Posted: **Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:47 am**

no_remorse28 wrote:I'm curious as to people's thoughts on A grade district players playing for ATCA clubs during the rounds there district club has a bye.

No issues. There haven't been many examples of this that I know of in recent years because SACA two day games haven't been aligned with ATCA two day games. Has there been a case this season?

Posted: **Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:25 pm**

Yeah on the weekend Port Districts had a lad, Thomas.

Bowls at pace with swing was good fun to watch, I personally don't have issue with it, just curious what people thought.

Posted: **Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:08 pm**

Jordan Thomas?

Reckon he was a Port Districts junior

Heading back to your home club perhaps a bit different to a 'ring in' but as long as the rules are the same for all clubs should be ok

Is there a maximum number that can be brought in?

Posted: **Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:42 pm**

Tony Clifton wrote:Jordan Thomas?

Reckon he was a Port Districts junior

Heading back to your home club perhaps a bit different to a 'ring in' but as long as the rules are the same for all clubs should be ok

Is there a maximum number that can be brought in?

Clubs can only have one Dual Registerred player in a game.

Posted: **Tue Nov 19, 2019 3:05 pm**

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:Jordan Thomas?

Reckon he was a Port Districts junior

Heading back to your home club perhaps a bit different to a 'ring in' but as long as the rules are the same for all clubs should be ok

Is there a maximum number that can be brought in?

Clubs can only have one Dual Registerred player in a game.

and 2 for the T20s?

Posted: **Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:21 pm**

Minimum Chips wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:Jordan Thomas?

Reckon he was a Port Districts junior

Heading back to your home club perhaps a bit different to a 'ring in' but as long as the rules are the same for all clubs should be ok

Is there a maximum number that can be brought in?

Clubs can only have one Dual Registerred player in a game.

and 2 for the T20s?

Correct

Posted: **Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:23 pm**

How about you reply to my msg SMG ya snob!

Posted: **Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:33 pm**

The Bedge wrote:How about you reply to my msg SMG ya snob!

Sent you an email ... sorry couldn't help

Posted: **Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:30 pm**

Good to see the ATCA getting a mention in this guys efforts to travel the country raising money for men's health:

https://www.aviewofaustraliafromfineleg ... as1lHxw6GU

Posted: **Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:49 pm**

Trader wrote:Good to see the ATCA getting a mention in this guys efforts to travel the country raising money for men's health:

https://www.aviewofaustraliafromfineleg ... as1lHxw6GU

Excellent read.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 9:05 pm**

When is the last time Pooraka lost two games in a row?

Posted: **Sun Nov 24, 2019 10:44 am**

Trader wrote:Good to see the ATCA getting a mention in this guys efforts to travel the country raising money for men's health:

https://www.aviewofaustraliafromfineleg ... as1lHxw6GU

Thanks for posting.

Posted: **Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:03 am**

in A2 this week

is the Flinders Park game actually in dispute & what happened with the timed out dismissal in the Unley vs Old Iggs game??

or are both of these MyCricket entering issues?

Posted: **Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:48 pm**

the smokey wrote:in A2 this week - what happened with the timed out dismissal in the Unley vs Old Iggs game??

Interesting they've entered it as 10 fa and declared too.
I suspect they had a player absent and neither team knows if it's 9 declared with him as DNB, or all out, and he should be listed as absent. Timed out almost certainly wrong, especially when you consider the previous pair put on roughly 20 so its not like it was a run of quick wickets.

the smokey wrote:in A2 this week - is the Flinders Park game actually in dispute

I would suggest the books didn't add up, or someone forgot to include the extras on one of the innings before hitting submit. The mycricket system forces you to dispute the result in order to get it changed.
I suspect it will be corrected soon, Heyzer is normally fairly quick on that sort of stuff.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:40 pm**

Heard that some of the Pooraka players weren't convinced that Eranga's action is as smooth as it should be.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:48 pm**

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Heard that some of the Pooraka players weren't convinced that Eranga's action is as smooth as it should be.

When I played cricket 2004 on the PS2 he was always the opening bowler for Sri Lanka, he leaked runs as Vaas was difficult to get away.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:58 pm**

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Heard that some of the Pooraka players weren't convinced that Eranga's action is as smooth as it should be.

Hmmm same could be said for an old scotch off spinner i watched last night.
Not saying he threw it but the action certainly wasnt orthodox and everyone commented.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:30 pm**

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Heard that some of the Pooraka players weren't convinced that Eranga's action is as smooth as it should be.

https://www.firstpost.com/sports/sri-la ... 44092.html

Posted: **Thu Nov 28, 2019 7:01 am**

Trader wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Heard that some of the Pooraka players weren't convinced that Eranga's action is as smooth as it should be.

https://www.firstpost.com/sports/sri-la ... 44092.html

ICC cleared his revised action in July 2017.
Prospect took him on last year, so I assume they thought his action was ok
He looked ok to me when he bowled in round 2.
I believe he hurt his ankle for the game against Pooraka and bowled off a short run. Maybe he fell back into old habits searching for for extra pace off a short run ... or maybe his action is fine and people have long memories.

Posted: **Fri Nov 29, 2019 9:11 am**

Found out last night atca bright sparks have programmed women's games for Sunday.
Every other grade not playing so having to get a wicket up for a t20 is a joke!
Well done atca!!

SA Footy

ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA

Re: ATCA