by woodublieve12 » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:18 am
by wycbloods » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:21 am
woodublieve12 wrote:
well thats the 1st time ive heard that
by CoverKing » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:32 am
by Tugga » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:38 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Tugga wrote:CoverKing wrote:NOthing from what we have heard i dont think Booney. Hopefully it will get thru.
Thanks for the info Roseboy. Definitely interesting to see North Haven Stayed up in both. I agreee with section 1 staying up (and iv also heard the rumour mitchell park has asked to go down) but section 2 staying up is a bit questionable IMO. I think Morphys have lost a couple of players from the premiership XI which will make it a touch harder for them to be a finals competitor. However i think they have a pretty good 5-6 players which will definitely see them be mid range of the table.
Good to see what i think, the best 12 clubs now in section 1
Who are the player's that Morphy's have lost CoverKing ?
i reckon the relegation promotion system in this copetition is a joke!!!!!! it still bothers me that clubs ask to go down..... poor form... also if you finish bottom you should most definitely get relegated... cause clearly your not in the best 12 teams. on North Havens circumstance they are VERY VERY lucky to still be in section 1. are the b grade being relegated????? this is not a dig, i have plenty of time for Nth Haven.... Good bunch of guys... Also its very ordinary of Mitchell Park ask to come down, just like Morphy's they want to be a big fish in a small pond!!!!!!
by dundee12 » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:41 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Tugga wrote:CoverKing wrote:NOthing from what we have heard i dont think Booney. Hopefully it will get thru.
Thanks for the info Roseboy. Definitely interesting to see North Haven Stayed up in both. I agreee with section 1 staying up (and iv also heard the rumour mitchell park has asked to go down) but section 2 staying up is a bit questionable IMO. I think Morphys have lost a couple of players from the premiership XI which will make it a touch harder for them to be a finals competitor. However i think they have a pretty good 5-6 players which will definitely see them be mid range of the table.
Good to see what i think, the best 12 clubs now in section 1
Who are the player's that Morphy's have lost CoverKing ?
i reckon the relegation promotion system in this copetition is a joke!!!!!! it still bothers me that clubs ask to go down..... poor form... also if you finish bottom you should most definitely get relegated... cause clearly your not in the best 12 teams. on North Havens circumstance they are VERY VERY lucky to still be in section 1. are the b grade being relegated????? this is not a dig, i have plenty of time for Nth Haven.... Good bunch of guys... Also its very ordinary of Mitchell Park ask to come down, just like Morphy's they want to be a big fish in a small pond!!!!!!
by woodublieve12 » Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:15 pm
dundee12 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tugga wrote:CoverKing wrote:NOthing from what we have heard i dont think Booney. Hopefully it will get thru.
Thanks for the info Roseboy. Definitely interesting to see North Haven Stayed up in both. I agreee with section 1 staying up (and iv also heard the rumour mitchell park has asked to go down) but section 2 staying up is a bit questionable IMO. I think Morphys have lost a couple of players from the premiership XI which will make it a touch harder for them to be a finals competitor. However i think they have a pretty good 5-6 players which will definitely see them be mid range of the table.
Good to see what i think, the best 12 clubs now in section 1
Who are the player's that Morphy's have lost CoverKing ?
i reckon the relegation promotion system in this copetition is a joke!!!!!! it still bothers me that clubs ask to go down..... poor form... also if you finish bottom you should most definitely get relegated... cause clearly your not in the best 12 teams. on North Havens circumstance they are VERY VERY lucky to still be in section 1. are the b grade being relegated????? this is not a dig, i have plenty of time for Nth Haven.... Good bunch of guys... Also its very ordinary of Mitchell Park ask to come down, just like Morphy's they want to be a big fish in a small pond!!!!!!
what you been smoking??? Morphys had no choice. get some facts straight first,
1 bad season and straight back up.
by bazza1 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:06 pm
by bazza1 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:14 pm
by BAZZA13 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:36 pm
bazza1 wrote:Any player movements/ rumours?
Ledgard (Southern Districts) and Verral (work) are probably going to be missing from the ICC line up this year.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:47 pm
bazza1 wrote:[i guess i heard wrong. well they should be in section 1.... i know for a fact if plympton A grade side went to section 2 it would be a TOTAL embarassment. it would be a disgrace to our club..... however i i reckon if you finish bottom you get relegated...
by bazza1 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:18 pm
by wycbloods » Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:33 am
bazza1 wrote:Any player movements/ rumours?
Ledgard (Southern Districts) and Verral (work) are probably going to be missing from the ICC line up this year.
by wycbloods » Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:42 am
by BAZZA13 » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:14 pm
wycbloods wrote:bazza1 wrote:Any player movements/ rumours?
Ledgard (Southern Districts) and Verral (work) are probably going to be missing from the ICC line up this year.
I would think Bowen would give district another crack as well.
by DILLIGAF » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:56 pm
wycbloods wrote:Looks like we may have a new side joining our competition this year. The South Coasters playing possibly out of Happy Valley or the Lonsdale area. Some players from Southern and the Sharks forming a new club i believe.
Some interesting motions put forward by some clubs with the Sharks pressing on with their heat policy which, IMHO, is just plain stupid and has no chance of getting through.
by wycbloods » Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:05 pm
DILLIGAF wrote:wycbloods wrote:Looks like we may have a new side joining our competition this year. The South Coasters playing possibly out of Happy Valley or the Lonsdale area. Some players from Southern and the Sharks forming a new club i believe.
Some interesting motions put forward by some clubs with the Sharks pressing on with their heat policy which, IMHO, is just plain stupid and has no chance of getting through.
i heard they were gonna play at morphet vale high which will make it basiclly o, sullivans beach / lonsdale
by bazza1 » Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:41 pm
by The Hound » Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:48 pm
wycbloods wrote:DILLIGAF wrote:wycbloods wrote:Looks like we may have a new side joining our competition this year. The South Coasters playing possibly out of Happy Valley or the Lonsdale area. Some players from Southern and the Sharks forming a new club i believe.
Some interesting motions put forward by some clubs with the Sharks pressing on with their heat policy which, IMHO, is just plain stupid and has no chance of getting through.
i heard they were gonna play at morphet vale high which will make it basiclly o, sullivans beach / lonsdale
They said last night they were looking at Happy Valley primary( i think it was primary) first. But they had another ground as a back up and O Sullivans/ Lonsdale is the one they mentioned.
by wycbloods » Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:14 pm
The Hound wrote:wycbloods wrote:DILLIGAF wrote:wycbloods wrote:Looks like we may have a new side joining our competition this year. The South Coasters playing possibly out of Happy Valley or the Lonsdale area. Some players from Southern and the Sharks forming a new club i believe.
Some interesting motions put forward by some clubs with the Sharks pressing on with their heat policy which, IMHO, is just plain stupid and has no chance of getting through.
i heard they were gonna play at morphet vale high which will make it basiclly o, sullivans beach / lonsdale
They said last night they were looking at Happy Valley primary( i think it was primary) first. But they had another ground as a back up and O Sullivans/ Lonsdale is the one they mentioned.
The ASCA should do some due diligence with a new team from the south, could it be the old Sullies under another name. Sullies may still owe the SCA some money (fines and team registration) and this is one way of not paying by coming in under a different name.
by CoverKing » Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:56 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |