by catchit » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:49 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:51 pm
catchit wrote:oh! was it danny stevens?
by catchit » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:59 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:catchit wrote:oh! was it danny stevens?
Nah, DW played juniors with Col Rundle, he scored his first ton on the weekend after 25 years of playing cricket.
by catchit » Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:06 pm
by catchit » Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:35 pm
browny2323 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:browny2323 wrote:
Whats the difference when you are playing footy is what feels like 0 degrees and its belting down rain..
Doesnt get cancelled because its too cold!
The point i was making aswell what the PDCA let us all play on that Saturday at 39 degrees, but the next day was too hot!!!?? Pffft, whatever. You cant tell me that it wasnt hotter than 39 out at Two Wells that day... The whole game should have been cancelled if we are going by "the rules".
Browny, I can totally understand your angst after last season, each year, all of the club delegates get together at the PDCA AGM and discuss all possible variations of the rules and vote on changing them, it is a long night and nobody is allowed to leave until the meeting has been called "closed".
If you start making assumptions on weather and conditions it will open a bigger can of worms, they have got it right IMO, during the 6pm news on the night before a game is scheduled, if the weather-person states that the forecast for Elizabeth is 40 or above, there is no cricket. This eliminates any grey areas and they use Elizabeth because it is relatively central for all of the PDCA clubs.
I believe they have got it right aswell, but just would have been nice to see a result for finals.
by Dogmatic » Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:48 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:browny2323 wrote:
Whats the difference when you are playing footy is what feels like 0 degrees and its belting down rain..
Doesnt get cancelled because its too cold!
The point i was making aswell what the PDCA let us all play on that Saturday at 39 degrees, but the next day was too hot!!!?? Pffft, whatever. You cant tell me that it wasnt hotter than 39 out at Two Wells that day... The whole game should have been cancelled if we are going by "the rules".
Browny, I can totally understand your angst after last season, each year, all of the club delegates get together at the PDCA AGM and discuss all possible variations of the rules and vote on changing them, it is a long night and nobody is allowed to leave until the meeting has been called "closed".
If you start making assumptions on weather and conditions it will open a bigger can of worms, they have got it right IMO, during the 6pm news on the night before a game is scheduled, if the weather-person states that the forecast for Elizabeth is 40 or above, there is no cricket. This eliminates any grey areas and they use Elizabeth because it is relatively central for all of the PDCA clubs.
by Grahaml » Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:51 pm
catchit wrote:Grahaml wrote:It would be nice to see results for finals but you have to make player safety a primary concern. You can't ask 50 year old blokes to run around the oval all day in 40 degree heat when all the medical evidence says that's just far too risky.
They have to have a hard and fast rule applied across the comp, and it can't be subjective. And you can't change the rules because it's a final IMHO. If there were a fair way to do so then so be it but I can't think of one. It probably goes to show the benefit of finishing top 2.
For what it's worth I think the way the rule is applied is perfect. The only thing they might look at changing is the number they go on because in time it will change to 36, perhaps slowly, and perhaps one degree at a time.
isnt cricket a summer sport? if its to hot in the kitchen get out i say.. i reckon 40 has to stay.. at 36 we would only play half a season and prob not play any finals.. how would that keep people keen?
by Browny25 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:33 am
catchit wrote::lol: so it sounds like you guys was hanging your hats on the rule to change over night.. like b&s said we all knew what the weather was for sunday.. should of put us in at 3.30.. what did you have to lose..thats right i forgot.. we went through cause we finished higher than you, so how did we not deserve it?
by Browny25 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:35 am
catchit wrote:and browny you know for a fact i didnt start it..![]()
i have only just began
by Browny25 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:37 am
catchit wrote:browny2323 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:browny2323 wrote:
Whats the difference when you are playing footy is what feels like 0 degrees and its belting down rain..
Doesnt get cancelled because its too cold!
The point i was making aswell what the PDCA let us all play on that Saturday at 39 degrees, but the next day was too hot!!!?? Pffft, whatever. You cant tell me that it wasnt hotter than 39 out at Two Wells that day... The whole game should have been cancelled if we are going by "the rules".
Browny, I can totally understand your angst after last season, each year, all of the club delegates get together at the PDCA AGM and discuss all possible variations of the rules and vote on changing them, it is a long night and nobody is allowed to leave until the meeting has been called "closed".
If you start making assumptions on weather and conditions it will open a bigger can of worms, they have got it right IMO, during the 6pm news on the night before a game is scheduled, if the weather-person states that the forecast for Elizabeth is 40 or above, there is no cricket. This eliminates any grey areas and they use Elizabeth because it is relatively central for all of the PDCA clubs.
I believe they have got it right aswell, but just would have been nice to see a result for finals.
def was a result two wells premiers.. need to build a bridge browny and worry about this year..
dont want the weather to stuff you up 2 years in a row..
by Browny25 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:38 am
catchit wrote:oh! was it danny stevens?
by james07 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:42 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:46 am
james07 wrote:I thought there was a simple solution that the exec of the PDCA couldve put into place with the forecast for Sunday already over 40 it shoudve been declared a one dayer on the sat, no team disadvantaged and a fair game for all.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:01 am
by affup » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:31 pm
catchit wrote:just read the funniest thing...abloke in div 1 in the churches comp got hit ont the pads batting at 5, everyone went up the umpire said not out his team mate said it wasnt out.. yet he walked![]()
![]()
would you walk if you was givin not out for a caught behind and you hit it?
by james07 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:32 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:james07 wrote:I thought there was a simple solution that the exec of the PDCA couldve put into place with the forecast for Sunday already over 40 it shoudve been declared a one dayer on the sat, no team disadvantaged and a fair game for all.
The trouble with that is the forecast is quite often a few degrees out after a 24 hour gap, besides, the true indication of the better side is over the longer version of the game.
by affup » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:40 pm
james07 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:james07 wrote:I thought there was a simple solution that the exec of the PDCA couldve put into place with the forecast for Sunday already over 40 it shoudve been declared a one dayer on the sat, no team disadvantaged and a fair game for all.
The trouble with that is the forecast is quite often a few degrees out after a 24 hour gap, besides, the true indication of the better side is over the longer version of the game.
Understand that but if the rule stated that it was based on the friday night forecast it should be ok
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:51 pm
affup wrote:james07 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:james07 wrote:I thought there was a simple solution that the exec of the PDCA couldve put into place with the forecast for Sunday already over 40 it shoudve been declared a one dayer on the sat, no team disadvantaged and a fair game for all.
The trouble with that is the forecast is quite often a few degrees out after a 24 hour gap, besides, the true indication of the better side is over the longer version of the game.
Understand that but if the rule stated that it was based on the friday night forecast it should be ok
the semi final last year was saturday's play was deciced on friday nights forcast sunday's play was decided on saturday nights forecast it was stated by Frank last season that it was the forecast for the night before a days play
by Groover » Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:50 pm
by norm11 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:02 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Round 2 of our 20/20 comp is on this Sunday at Playford.
12pm Playford vs Craigmore
3pm Smithfield vs Eastern Park
Round 1 was a great day enjoyed by all that attended. Playford 8/128 (20overs) def. Smithfield 127 (19.5 overs), Craigmore defeated Eastern Park easily after dismissing them for 43.
Due to the 2nd game finishing so early, we had a 13 over a side game for any of the specatators that wanted a hit, that was a good laugh.
Cheap drinks, bbq and some entertaining cricket will be on the cards again. We had a fair crowd in round 1.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |