Lightning McQueen wrote:Mark Hanson must be incredibly fit, only 7 boundaries and a 6 out of his 500+ runs for the season.
Haha, yeah those lazy SOBs at Pooraka do the bare minimum when it comes to entering scores into MyCricket.
by Trader » Thu Mar 25, 2021 11:00 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Mark Hanson must be incredibly fit, only 7 boundaries and a 6 out of his 500+ runs for the season.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:31 pm
Trader wrote:Now you're testing my memory...
1 - Cuconuts, M
2 - Gabb (wk)
3 - Hanson
4 - Overall
5 - Bailey
6 - Behrendt
7 - Fox
8 - Eranga
9 - Pickford
10 - Clayfield
11 - Carey
12 - Fonseka
by Trader » Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:04 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Trader wrote:Now you're testing my memory...
1 - Cuconuts, M
2 - Gabb (wk)
3 - Hanson
4 - Overall
5 - Bailey
6 - Behrendt
7 - Fox
8 - Eranga
9 - Pickford
10 - Clayfield
11 - Carey
12 - Fonseka
If Gabb selected as WK, how does Fonseka get in?
by Sonofbrowny25 » Thu Mar 25, 2021 3:36 pm
by Trader » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:05 pm
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:The fact an allrounder wins the medal yet doesn't win all round performance of the year is beyond me
by Sonofbrowny25 » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:51 pm
Trader wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:The fact an allrounder wins the medal yet doesn't win all round performance of the year is beyond me
I can accept the umpire voted award (medal) having a different winner to the league appointed award (all rounder of the year).
Fox simply didn't have anyone taking votes off him.
But I'm not sure Eranga should have won the all rounder award anyway.
Fox - 440 runs at (at 54.88), 13 wickets (at 32.08). (medal)
Eranga - 280 runs (at 28.2), 24 wickets (at 16.71). (all rounder award)
Clayfield - 250 runs (at 35.43), 28 wickets (at 13.46).
I'd have given it to Clayfield, 4 extra wickets is worth more than 30 runs IMO. Clayfield also has better batting and bowling averages than Eranga.
But I did notice they put up Eranga's fielding award when they announced him as the all rounder, perhaps they were trying to help justify his selection!
by Senor Moto Gadili » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:56 pm
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:The fact an allrounder wins the medal yet doesn't win all round performance of the year is beyond me
by Sonofbrowny25 » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:35 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:The fact an allrounder wins the medal yet doesn't win all round performance of the year is beyond me
I'm not sure you can classify yourself as an allrounder if you only take 13 wickets. I reckon 250 runs and 20 wickets is the minimum standard.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Thu Mar 25, 2021 6:31 pm
Sonofbrowny25 wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:The fact an allrounder wins the medal yet doesn't win all round performance of the year is beyond me
I'm not sure you can classify yourself as an allrounder if you only take 13 wickets. I reckon 250 runs and 20 wickets is the minimum standard.
so we are saying he won it more as a batter who bowls?
he bats 4 and opens the bowling that to me still is allrounder and his batting was just stronger this season.
by Punter707 » Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:01 am
by Reilly » Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:24 am
by Sonofbrowny25 » Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:47 am
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Sonofbrowny25 wrote:The fact an allrounder wins the medal yet doesn't win all round performance of the year is beyond me
I'm not sure you can classify yourself as an allrounder if you only take 13 wickets. I reckon 250 runs and 20 wickets is the minimum standard.
so we are saying he won it more as a batter who bowls?
he bats 4 and opens the bowling that to me still is allrounder and his batting was just stronger this season.
We are talking about the best allrounder, which is based on overall performance with bat, ball and in the field. Fox falls short because he only took 13 wickets. I would have rated Eranga, Clayfield, Barnes and Pickford ahead of Fox as the best allrounder.
by Sonofbrowny25 » Fri Mar 26, 2021 10:47 am
Punter707 wrote:Eranga has played international cricket - Says enough doesn't it.
He has been a very good player for SPOC but he wasn't in the best 12 this season. Simple.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Fri Mar 26, 2021 1:10 pm
by Trader » Fri Mar 26, 2021 2:30 pm
by tigerpie » Sat Mar 27, 2021 8:00 pm
by no_remorse28 » Sat Mar 27, 2021 8:51 pm
mccard and Carey bowled amongst well together in partnership.tigerpie wrote:Para Hill's must've bowled well or were Flinders pk chucked in on a wetty?
Anyone know?
All out 65 in 45 overs looks bad.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sun Mar 28, 2021 7:45 am
no_remorse28 wrote:mccard and Carey bowled amongst well together in partnership.tigerpie wrote:Para Hill's must've bowled well or were Flinders pk chucked in on a wetty?
Anyone know?
All out 65 in 45 overs looks bad.
Pitch was well covered and rock hard, started late because of wet surrounds. was an incredible bowling and fielding effort.
A lot of loose shots cost Flinders Parks wickets. Hence the 6 catches by the wk
by tigerpie » Sun Mar 28, 2021 9:53 am
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:mccard and Carey bowled amongst well together in partnership.tigerpie wrote:Para Hill's must've bowled well or were Flinders pk chucked in on a wetty?
Anyone know?
All out 65 in 45 overs looks bad.
Pitch was well covered and rock hard, started late because of wet surrounds. was an incredible bowling and fielding effort.
A lot of loose shots cost Flinders Parks wickets. Hence the 6 catches by the wk
So, why did you dob them in if the pitch was so good?
by no_remorse28 » Sun Mar 28, 2021 11:54 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |