DKL wrote:Can't believe Peter McMillan missed out on the Hamley Bridge job. I thought Red Barnett had finished with coaching after the terrible job he did with Callington?
Did Peter even go for the job?

by norm11 » Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:44 pm
DKL wrote:Can't believe Peter McMillan missed out on the Hamley Bridge job. I thought Red Barnett had finished with coaching after the terrible job he did with Callington?
by OnSong » Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:50 pm
DKL wrote:Can't believe Peter McMillan missed out on the Hamley Bridge job. I thought Red Barnett had finished with coaching after the terrible job he did with Callington?
by OnSong » Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:11 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:39 pm
OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.
As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
by Swamp Donkey » Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:48 pm
Woofa wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:Shh..Listen2me wrote:Hopefully he is not like the other coach acquisition you guys got from the Barossa after winning numerous amount of flags. Didn't he only last one game
Uumm...one season numbnuts. It was a blessing we've won 3 flags since then...
The old' tall poppy syndrome is kicking in already.... hang in there folks
Tall poppy syndrome?? Mallala have been a good side the last few years but a bit rich to play the tall poppy victim.
by mighty hounds » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:02 pm
norm11 wrote:DKL wrote:Can't believe Peter McMillan missed out on the Hamley Bridge job. I thought Red Barnett had finished with coaching after the terrible job he did with Callington?
Did Peter even go for the job?
by Mythical Creature » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:29 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.
As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
Did any clubs actually use thier entire points allocation this season anyway?? I know HWE and Mallala both had a few to play with and I'd say Two Wells would have had a few spare each week. Given all those players loose a point again next year, I'd expect Mallala to have ~6 to play with in 2012.
by Mythical Creature » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:31 pm
OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
by OnSong » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:36 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.
As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
Did any clubs actually use thier entire points allocation this season anyway?? I know HWE and Mallala both had a few to play with and I'd say Two Wells would have had a few spare each week. Given all those players loose a point again next year, I'd expect Mallala to have ~6 to play with in 2012.
We used 3 points in our first semi final.
by Mythical Creature » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:50 pm
OnSong wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.
As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
Did any clubs actually use thier entire points allocation this season anyway?? I know HWE and Mallala both had a few to play with and I'd say Two Wells would have had a few spare each week. Given all those players loose a point again next year, I'd expect Mallala to have ~6 to play with in 2012.
We used 3 points in our first semi final.
Gilles, Fleming, Mills = 9 points yeah?
Did you have 6 under 18s playing that day?
by OnSong » Wed Oct 12, 2011 4:54 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:OnSong wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:
Did any clubs actually use thier entire points allocation this season anyway?? I know HWE and Mallala both had a few to play with and I'd say Two Wells would have had a few spare each week. Given all those players loose a point again next year, I'd expect Mallala to have ~6 to play with in 2012.
We used 3 points in our first semi final.
Gilles, Fleming, Mills = 9 points yeah?
Did you have 6 under 18s playing that day?
Fleming is a 0 pointer. Never played A Grade before coming to us
Mills will next year be in his 4th year with our club = 0 points
Gillies 3, Spurr 2, Sharer -1, Curnow -1 = 3 points
All other players for that final were 0 pointers.
by Fog Horn Leg Horn » Wed Oct 12, 2011 5:30 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.
As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
Did any clubs actually use thier entire points allocation this season anyway?? I know HWE and Mallala both had a few to play with and I'd say Two Wells would have had a few spare each week. Given all those players loose a point again next year, I'd expect Mallala to have ~6 to play with in 2012.
by The reigning Ben.C » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:23 pm
Shh..Listen2me wrote:Sounds like Hamley are trying to go back to the golden days of the early 2000. Barnett, Mckenzie, Young all reported to be going back to the club. Wonder if Kym Herrmann will make an appearance. Difference however is that these players are 7 to 8 years older and also the whole competition I believe is far better than it was back in those days. Mallala, Balak, and Virginia would be a step above that team. They would prob be on par with hummocks/united of last year. My thoughts only
by The Duke » Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:32 pm
Mythical Creature wrote:OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
Lesley should be a 2 pointer next year otherwise Balak have effectively got a 2 point advantage over the rest of the comp. Won't happen though and he will be a 0 pointer, but he should be 2 points for fairness.
by Bum Crack » Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:05 pm
The Duke wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:OnSong wrote:Points for 2012:
Balaklava: 9
Virginia: 9
Mallala: 8
United: 12
HWE: 12
Two Wells: 12
Hamley Bridge: 15
Now, we all remember at the start of the year how L Pearson was exempted and held a 0 point value.
Did this only apply for one year? If so, possibly could become 2 points if not exempted again.As a result of the exemption though, other clubs appealed and got an extra three points from what I can gather.
So not sure what happens now.
Lesley should be a 2 pointer next year otherwise Balak have effectively got a 2 point advantage over the rest of the comp. Won't happen though and he will be a 0 pointer, but he should be 2 points for fairness.
How does this Lesley Person joker go?
by mighty hounds » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:34 am
by mighty hounds » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:35 am
The reigning Ben.C wrote:Shh..Listen2me wrote:Sounds like Hamley are trying to go back to the golden days of the early 2000. Barnett, Mckenzie, Young all reported to be going back to the club. Wonder if Kym Herrmann will make an appearance. Difference however is that these players are 7 to 8 years older and also the whole competition I believe is far better than it was back in those days. Mallala, Balak, and Virginia would be a step above that team. They would prob be on par with hummocks/united of last year. My thoughts only
Your thoughts are extremely outlandish. If you think the Balak of today is better than the Hamley of 2003/2004 you are an ignoramous.
by Full Stop » Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:55 pm
by mighty hounds » Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:29 pm
Richie rich wrote:mighty hounds wrote:Two Wells had no players attracting points.
Coates 0
Brown 0
Wolfiel 0
One game we had -6 and for the majority had -5 but out of the minus group from this season will become 0 points
why Wouldnt two wells recruit players. They have been average for the past few years. It might be time to dig deep get some quality players and people to the club to help the footy side progress.
by OnSong » Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:00 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |