Nocyrils wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Cyril, come catch up with us, we've got ciders and clearance forms!
i see u boys got up well done lads. mate it was frustrating out there. beauty of it was it was only the first game . we didnt have to many winners if any, thats for sure.
The difference was Mallala's willingness to work without the footy. Hamley were consistently outnumbered at the contest and then beaten on the spread. At times it looked like the magpies had extra men on the field, such was the willingness of their players to work to open space and provide multiple options for the ball carrier. Conversely, when HB had the ball in hand too often players were giving one lead and then stopping, therefore clogging space and forcing the kicker to go long up the line to a contest. As Cyrils said, it looked like a reliance on the big names to do the hard work and a lack of work rate both ways is what blew the margin out. That's what I took out of it as a spectator. Take nothing away from Mallala though, they were very good and exceptionally clean and disciplined, quite the trademark of a Lubcke coached side.