Knuckle dusters?Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Also notice that Rosewater had a player suspended for 1 match on 2 July for wearing jewellery - never seen that before.
by The Bedge » Thu Jul 21, 2016 3:03 pm
Knuckle dusters?Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Also notice that Rosewater had a player suspended for 1 match on 2 July for wearing jewellery - never seen that before.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Tony Clifton » Thu Jul 21, 2016 3:45 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I see Dylan Lockwood, who was on the list of Rosewater breaches, received a 1 match penalty for undue rough play. Is he likely to face further sanctions because he allegedly refused to the leave the ground? Also notice that Rosewater had a player suspended for 1 match on 2 July for wearing jewellery - never seen that before.
by HH3 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 3:47 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I see Dylan Lockwood, who was on the list of Rosewater breaches, received a 1 match penalty for undue rough play. Is he likely to face further sanctions because he allegedly refused to the leave the ground? Also notice that Rosewater had a player suspended for 1 match on 2 July for wearing jewellery - never seen that before.
It's a crime to look fabulous?
by jo172 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 3:55 pm
by BoundaryRider84 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:18 pm
jo172 wrote:Gepps would be some what relieved with how thoroughly they've been kicked out of the news!
by Booney » Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:25 pm
by adr107 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:26 pm
HH3 wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I see Dylan Lockwood, who was on the list of Rosewater breaches, received a 1 match penalty for undue rough play. Is he likely to face further sanctions because he allegedly refused to the leave the ground? Also notice that Rosewater had a player suspended for 1 match on 2 July for wearing jewellery - never seen that before.
It's a crime to look fabulous?
If that's a crime, lock me up and throw away the key!
by Mr Beefy » Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:26 am
by Footy Chick » Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:31 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by heater31 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:33 am
Booney wrote:Maintaining relationships with sponsors will be the biggest challenge one would think. Money is tight every where and someone dipping in $10k or more might reassess the return on investment.
Question, those in the know, major sponsors at that level, what sort of coin would they be chucking around? Is the $10-15k per year about right?
by jo172 » Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:37 am
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 22, 2016 11:52 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Obviously Salisbury North are on amended affiliation agreements, which other clubs are?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Mr Beefy » Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:46 pm
Zartan wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Obviously Salisbury North are on amended affiliation agreements, which other clubs are?
Pretty sure: Smithfield, Ingle Farm, Salisbury(?), Eastern Park, Central United
by Footy Chick » Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:49 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Tony Clifton » Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:53 pm
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:59 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:Do clubs with sanctions hanging over their heads get baited and goaded during matches? I know they've brought it on themselves but smart opposition would exploit it you'd think. I don't have a better solution mind you.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:04 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Zartan wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Obviously Salisbury North are on amended affiliation agreements, which other clubs are?
Pretty sure: Smithfield, Ingle Farm, Salisbury(?), Eastern Park, Central United
So what happens if a player gets reported?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by coman » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:08 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Not sure if Smiffies still are
by Mr Beefy » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:10 pm
Zartan wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Zartan wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Obviously Salisbury North are on amended affiliation agreements, which other clubs are?
Pretty sure: Smithfield, Ingle Farm, Salisbury(?), Eastern Park, Central United
So what happens if a player gets reported?
With us, off the top of my head:
$2, 000 fine and If a player or official is reports and found guilty, all senior teams are penalised 6x premiership points plus 2 premiership points per match suspended.
We also have to have two match day officials in all grades at all matches, and were required to hand over two home games to opposition clubs.
by Dangeroos » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:10 pm
Zartan wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:Do clubs with sanctions hanging over their heads get baited and goaded during matches? I know they've brought it on themselves but smart opposition would exploit it you'd think. I don't have a better solution mind you.
Don't know about the other clubs, but yes at Ingle Farm - particularly early on (almost all last season), clubs would bait our players, rough them up, push the boundaries - especially in the C grade.. Credit to our lads who just copped it and moved on with the game, cant have been easy!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |