by Magpies Nest » Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:20 pm
by valleys07 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:48 pm
Magpies Nest wrote:Just want to wish Matthew Mooney all the best for his 150th this week. Good to see him in some vintage form this season. Expect the boys to bring home a win against Plympton on Saturday.
by boozers » Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:58 pm
valleys07 wrote:Magpies Nest wrote:Just want to wish Matthew Mooney all the best for his 150th this week. Good to see him in some vintage form this season. Expect the boys to bring home a win against Plympton on Saturday.
Ill follow suit there MN and wish Lee Duggan all the best as he also lines up for his 150th this weekend for the dees. Has been in great form this season and deserves a win in what is no doubt a 4 point game for both clubs.
by Masha » Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:13 pm
Robran wrote:congrats to blodge player matty leigh for getting of his investigation last night and rightly so, plympton you had 7 wks to get your story right and ya couldnt even do that. what happen to all the witnesses u had, you send your captain in who neva seen the incident which he admitted last night, and a boundry umpire that swears he seen number 6 hit your player without and doubt because he was standing right there yet the incident happen in the middle of the ground in general play i thought boundry umpires were meant to be near the boundry line not in the middle of the ground, funny thing is we dont have a number 6 interesting. even the umpire said he sent number 8 off for wrestling yet it was infact number 3 who was sent off which was on the game report which was looked at last night, anyway good to see investigation commitee got this one right. hopefully young matty can get on with footy now after having this shi# hanging over his head for the last 7 weeks.
by boozers » Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:35 pm
Masha wrote:Robran wrote:congrats to blodge player matty leigh for getting of his investigation last night and rightly so, plympton you had 7 wks to get your story right and ya couldnt even do that. what happen to all the witnesses u had, you send your captain in who neva seen the incident which he admitted last night, and a boundry umpire that swears he seen number 6 hit your player without and doubt because he was standing right there yet the incident happen in the middle of the ground in general play i thought boundry umpires were meant to be near the boundry line not in the middle of the ground, funny thing is we dont have a number 6 interesting. even the umpire said he sent number 8 off for wrestling yet it was infact number 3 who was sent off which was on the game report which was looked at last night, anyway good to see investigation commitee got this one right. hopefully young matty can get on with footy now after having this shi# hanging over his head for the last 7 weeks.
All you can do is laugh. On to the footy now.
by Masha » Wed Jul 06, 2011 10:47 pm
boozers wrote:Masha wrote:All you can do is laugh. On to the footy now.
I played at Plympton and know Plympton well and can't believe anyone there would deliberately give false information in order to have an opposition player suspended without good reason!
There must be more to it surely...Tribunals in our league mean nothing to be honest, cmon guys its all about the evidence and if it was CLEARLY SEEN BY THE UMPIRE.
Ive been there before and the umpires are the ones under the hammer not the players
Innocent until proven guilty no cameras here guys! lol
by boozers » Wed Jul 06, 2011 11:07 pm
Masha wrote:boozers wrote:Masha wrote:All you can do is laugh. On to the footy now.
I played at Plympton and know Plympton well and can't believe anyone there would deliberately give false information in order to have an opposition player suspended without good reason!
There must be more to it surely...Tribunals in our league mean nothing to be honest, cmon guys its all about the evidence and if it was CLEARLY SEEN BY THE UMPIRE.
Ive been there before and the umpires are the ones under the hammer not the players
Innocent until proven guilty no cameras here guys! lol
Well someone did mention the supporters who made the most noise were the ones on the cans....so maybe the boundary umpire was too?
by Masha » Wed Jul 06, 2011 11:09 pm
boozers wrote:Masha wrote:boozers wrote:I played at Plympton and know Plympton well and can't believe anyone there would deliberately give false information in order to have an opposition player suspended without good reason!
There must be more to it surely...Tribunals in our league mean nothing to be honest, cmon guys its all about the evidence and if it was CLEARLY SEEN BY THE UMPIRE.
Ive been there before and the umpires are the ones under the hammer not the players
Innocent until proven guilty no cameras here guys! lol
Well someone did mention the supporters who made the most noise were the ones on the cans....so maybe the boundary umpire was too?
Huh..I just cant wait to play Brahma again out there when theres plenty to play for, be a great game to watch thats for sure
by Robran » Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:14 am
boozers wrote:Masha wrote:Robran wrote:congrats to blodge player matty leigh for getting of his investigation last night and rightly so, plympton you had 7 wks to get your story right and ya couldnt even do that. what happen to all the witnesses u had, you send your captain in who neva seen the incident which he admitted last night, and a boundry umpire that swears he seen number 6 hit your player without and doubt because he was standing right there yet the incident happen in the middle of the ground in general play i thought boundry umpires were meant to be near the boundry line not in the middle of the ground, funny thing is we dont have a number 6 interesting. even the umpire said he sent number 8 off for wrestling yet it was infact number 3 who was sent off which was on the game report which was looked at last night, anyway good to see investigation commitee got this one right. hopefully young matty can get on with footy now after having this shi# hanging over his head for the last 7 weeks.
All you can do is laugh. On to the footy now.
I played at Plympton and know Plympton well and can't believe anyone there would deliberately give false information in order to have an opposition player suspended without good reason!
There must be more to it surely...Tribunals in our league mean nothing to be honest, cmon guys its all about the evidence and if it was CLEARLY SEEN BY THE UMPIRE.
Ive been there before and the umpires are the ones under the hammer not the players
Innocent until proven guilty no cameras here guys! lol
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:28 am
Robran wrote:it was clearly not seen by the umpire from his own mouth but he said he heard something just cant believe it went this far and your team plympton were the ones that kept postponing the hearing because your witnesses couldnt make it for 7 wks then your poor captain who neva seen the incident goes on clubs behafe with some boundry umpire, i just feel for matty for 7 wks having to constantly answer questions about this crap, glad this is over with and yeah return match should be a cracker regardless of the ladder positions...
by Robran » Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:37 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Robran wrote:it was clearly not seen by the umpire from his own mouth but he said he heard something just cant believe it went this far and your team plympton were the ones that kept postponing the hearing because your witnesses couldnt make it for 7 wks then your poor captain who neva seen the incident goes on clubs behafe with some boundry umpire, i just feel for matty for 7 wks having to constantly answer questions about this crap, glad this is over with and yeah return match should be a cracker regardless of the ladder positions...
no we weren't... the league investigated the report from the club, which takes time. then the league set the date. which was post poned due to some Brahma Lodge people being stuck interstate. thats what plympton were told from the saafl!
probably pretty lucky the umpire didnt see it i guess..
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:46 am
Robran wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Robran wrote:it was clearly not seen by the umpire from his own mouth but he said he heard something just cant believe it went this far and your team plympton were the ones that kept postponing the hearing because your witnesses couldnt make it for 7 wks then your poor captain who neva seen the incident goes on clubs behafe with some boundry umpire, i just feel for matty for 7 wks having to constantly answer questions about this crap, glad this is over with and yeah return match should be a cracker regardless of the ladder positions...
no we weren't... the league investigated the report from the club, which takes time. then the league set the date. which was post poned due to some Brahma Lodge people being stuck interstate. thats what plympton were told from the saafl!
probably pretty lucky the umpire didnt see it i guess..
no one from the lodge went interstate mate a matter of fact thats what we were told from saafl that infact the plympton witnesses were interstate mmmm. umpire may not have seen it because there was nothing to see..
by hollywood7477 » Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:15 pm
by Footy Chick » Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:20 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:Maybe the lodge and plympton people were holidaying together that's why it was postponed.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:49 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:Maybe the lodge and plympton people were holidaying together that's why it was postponed.
by amber_fluid » Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:55 pm
Boosh wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The Ash Man wrote:nicole wrote:the problem at N/H is H/V are trying to take over the club so they can claim a few wins for the season.
What the f*** are you on about??
NH have 1 more win than HV and if you can cast your little mind back a couple of weeks HV beat NH
Quit trolling
You can see it's a troll but you still bite.
Clever
Please don't reply to this idiot, if everyone ignores him he/she will go away
by amber_fluid » Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:03 pm
Footy Chick wrote::lol:
There's only one person at North Haven that calls me Princess!
by Footy Chick » Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:15 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Footy Chick wrote::lol:
There's only one person at North Haven that calls me Princess!
You love it when Lance calls you that FC!!
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by amber_fluid » Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:17 pm
Footy Chick wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Footy Chick wrote::lol:
There's only one person at North Haven that calls me Princess!
You love it when Lance calls you that FC!!
he's called me that? fair chance i wouldn't have understood him if he did
by nicole » Thu Jul 07, 2011 3:12 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |