SA Footy

Yes, Precious reported. Guess we'll find out tomorrow night...

Seatons score on the weekend was only the 16th highest in league history - and still 16 goals of Elizabeths effort back in 2005.

true story

Footy Chick wrote:Yes, Precious reported. Guess we'll find out tomorrow night...

Why have you referred to Jols as 'Precious'??

Hefty wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Yes, Precious reported. Guess we'll find out tomorrow night...

Why have you referred to Jols as 'Precious'??

Because I can...and have done so for years.
Wanna step outside about it?

Footy Chick wrote:

Hefty wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Yes, Precious reported. Guess we'll find out tomorrow night...

Why have you referred to Jols as 'Precious'??

Because I can...and have done so for years.
Wanna step outside about it?

Pretty simple question......dumbass answer

I answered your question, if you don't like the answer - instead of calling it dumb how about you go and crawl back under the rock you've clearly been living in because I've only been calling him that for, I dunno....SEVEN YEARS





.

Hefty wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

Hefty wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Yes, Precious reported. Guess we'll find out tomorrow night...

Why have you referred to Jols as 'Precious'??

Because I can...and have done so for years.
Wanna step outside about it?

Pretty simple question......dumbass answer

FC has called Jolls Precious for plenty of years now. So long infact I cant even remember why think it stems from her days at PNU.

You can't touch him

Oh, and the quiz night thing, which I will brag about until the day I die

Footy Chick wrote:I answered your question, if you don't like the answer - instead of calling it dumb how about you go and crawl back under the rock you've clearly been living in because I've only been calling him that for, I dunno....SEVEN YEARS





.

gee whiz, talk about precious!!

Footy Chick wrote:You can't touch him

Oh, and the quiz night thing, which I will brag about until the day I die

See wasn't that hard to just answer the question.

Is that ok with you?

Footy Chick wrote:Is that ok with you?

Nup, might crawl back under my rock!

Working fine for me..

Phantom Gossiper wrote:Working fine for me..

Ditto

What's the over under for combined goals between White and Wark Tomorrow? I'd set it at 21.5 I think

Higher

20 named on the Kilburn team sheet for today 6 without jumper numbers.

I heard from a very reliable source that last week that they only had 14 on the field.

Can someone confirm???

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:20 named on the Kilburn team sheet for today 6 without jumper numbers.

I heard from a very reliable source that last week that they only had 14 on the field.

Can someone confirm???

Correct

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:20 named on the Kilburn team sheet for today 6 without jumper numbers.

I heard from a very reliable source that last week that they only had 14 on the field.

Can someone confirm???

I think your "reliable source" is maybe one of those celebrity insiders that give all the girls magazines the gossip on Jennifer annistons pregnancies every week.

A celebrity insider told me Kilburn we're not flash however they did field a full side. Wark and white could kick 20 each this week, see if they share it round or play for goal kicking award.

Who wrote:I think your "reliable source" is maybe one of those celebrity insiders that give all the girls magazines the gossip on Jennifer annistons pregnancies every week.

A celebrity insider told me Kilburn we're not flash however they did field a full side. Wark and white could kick 20 each this week, see if they share it round or play for goal kicking award.

Not what I was told.. Although looking at the team sheet, may as well have played with 14 looking at some of the guys who got games