SA Footy

Yeah Amir must be fine if he's back out there.

Aus 3/247
Smith 90 not out
Handscomb 43 not out

Lucky Steve

Slight edge and no one appeals

100 to Smith.
He is an absolute freak.
Most of the games greats went at a century every 4 games, Smith is going at approximately 1 in 3!

locky801 wrote:

RustyCage wrote:Mahommed Amir looks to have injured his knee while fielding. Big loss for them if he goes down for the series

Back on the field and not far from bowling, obviously was just attention seeking

I reckon it "hurt" a lot more once it went past him for 4. Managed to deflect attention from how poor a fielding effort it was

Real good start from Australia today, a 16th test century for Smith and encouraging contributions from Renshaw (71) and Hanscomb (64 not out) puts Australia in a very strong position.

So this business about picking in form players from the Shield like Hanscomb and Renshaw seems to go ok. Who would have thought?

On Renshaw, still has plenty of work to do and is only 20 of course, but I like what I have seen so far. Yes he has clear issues on a line just on or outside off with a bit of movement. Certainty not alone there in the world of cricket, but at 20 he has the time to work on that. I like his approach to batting and opening. Has a good mindset to be out there for a while. I think with time we will really see this kid develop nicely.

amber_fluid wrote:Another good thing about day/night tests is you can come home from work, crack a beer and sit down and watch the last session in full.

Yep can't agree with you more. Start down after dinner once a few things were down and get to see a solid 25 overs.

Also I like the pink ball at night. Batting at night is clearly difficult even on flat decks - Great it adds something more to the game. Captains will try to take advantage of this and good on them. It just adds to the game.

stan wrote:So this business about picking in form players from the Shield like Hanscomb and Renshaw seems to go ok. Who would have thought?

On Renshaw, still has plenty of work to do and is only 20 of course, but I like what I have seen so far. Yes he has clear issues on a line just on or outside off with a bit of movement. Certainty not alone there in the world of cricket, but at 20 he has the time to work on that. I like his approach to batting and opening. Has a good mindset to be out there for a while. I think with time we will really see this kid develop nicely.

Totally agree. Saying that and seeing it work would put Sayers right up there for a crack. Based on the opportunity CA has given to Renshaw and Hanscomb. Sayers would have to be the in form bowler beyond test level I would certainly think eh?

Bombers4EVA wrote:

stan wrote:So this business about picking in form players from the Shield like Hanscomb and Renshaw seems to go ok. Who would have thought?

On Renshaw, still has plenty of work to do and is only 20 of course, but I like what I have seen so far. Yes he has clear issues on a line just on or outside off with a bit of movement. Certainty not alone there in the world of cricket, but at 20 he has the time to work on that. I like his approach to batting and opening. Has a good mindset to be out there for a while. I think with time we will really see this kid develop nicely.

Totally agree. Saying that and seeing it work would put Sayers right up there for a crack. Based on the opportunity CA has given to Renshaw and Hanscomb. Sayers would have to be the in form bowler beyond test level I would certainly think eh?

Agree with what being said, however with respect to the bit in bold, if he didn't have a problem with that type of delivery his name would be F***** Bradman!!!

stan wrote:So this business about picking in form players from the Shield like Hanscomb and Renshaw seems to go ok. Who would have thought?

On Renshaw, still has plenty of work to do and is only 20 of course, but I like what I have seen so far. Yes he has clear issues on a line just on or outside off with a bit of movement. Certainty not alone there in the world of cricket, but at 20 he has the time to work on that. I like his approach to batting and opening. Has a good mindset to be out there for a while. I think with time we will really see this kid develop nicely.

I love Renshaw's temperament for a guy who's only 20. You can't teach that.

The Dark Knight wrote:I love Renshaw's temperament for a guy who's only 20. You can't teach that.

Yep and as one who got frustrated at Adelaide due 15 scoring shots in 137 balls yesterday he showed what Chappelli was banging on about as he turned the strike over (17 x 1s) and had double the scoring shots for almost 20 less balls faced. Easiest spot to bat from is the other end!

Text book openers innings yesterday from him

Does he remind you of Katich?

More like Taylor - knows where his off stump is an a good leaver of the ball

Can I put it out there now: Matt Renshaw - FAC??

am Bays wrote:More like Taylor - knows where his off stump is an a good leaver of the ball

Can I put it out there now: Matt Renshaw - FAC??

Hmmm maybe. But might also be a little early.

am Bays wrote:Can I put it out there now: Matt Renshaw - FAC??

What's FAC?

Zartan wrote:

am Bays wrote:Can I put it out there now: Matt Renshaw - FAC??

What's FAC?

Future Australian Captain

Zartan wrote:

am Bays wrote:Can I put it out there now: Matt Renshaw - FAC??

What's FAC?

Ha ha ha

am Bays wrote:More like Taylor - knows where his off stump is an a good leaver of the ball

Can I put it out there now: Matt Renshaw - FAC??

I'm referring to the way that Katich loved to leave the ball and take his time making runs.

locky801 wrote:

RustyCage wrote:Mahommed Amir looks to have injured his knee while fielding. Big loss for them if he goes down for the series

Back on the field and not far from bowling, obviously was just attention seeking

Must of taken tips from Lindsay Thomas

Bombers4EVA wrote:Does he remind you of Katich?

I see alot of Matthew Elliott in him with the way he plays his shots and technique wise. Sort of looks like Matthew Hayden stance wise too.