SA Footy

RustyCage wrote:edited to avoid confusion

This should be correct.

oops, didn't realise the points for WA's win was already put up!

Currently

SA 22
NSW 18
WA 14
Tas 10
Vic 8*
Qld 6*

*includes 1st innings points from Qld v Vic, which looks like being a draw

Rolled like a White Ox!

regards,

REB

RustyCage wrote:Wouldn't be too many times in the history of the sport where the game was won with penalty runs would there?

Depends, I'd have thought no balls and wides are penalty runs.
The five runs go in the sundries.

EAT IT RED!

Squids wrote:EAT IT RED!

Come back when you've won 45 Sheilds my Jellyback friend. Form is temporary, class is permanent.
regards,

REB

Dogwatcher wrote:

RustyCage wrote:Wouldn't be too many times in the history of the sport where the game was won with penalty runs would there?

Depends, I'd have thought no balls and wides are penalty runs.
The five runs go in the sundries.

no balls and wides are sundries or extras, same as penalty runs, NB and Wd are different to penalty runs

Dogwatcher wrote:

RustyCage wrote:Wouldn't be too many times in the history of the sport where the game was won with penalty runs would there?

Depends, I'd have thought no balls and wides are penalty runs.
The five runs go in the sundries.

They go in sundries because they don't get credited to the batsman. But no balls and wides are certainly not penalty runs.

it really is no surprise the Redbacks are on fire this season when you think deeply about it.........


they will finish top

get the right to host the final............................in the parklands

teh final will be at the Adelaide Oval

ok, I thought the Rolling Stones were taking over the venue .......my mistake

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:ok, I thought the Rolling Stones were taking over the venue .......my mistake

Apparently there's window that the shield final will be played in if it's here, according to Keith Bradshaw

I just read about a first class cricket game in India that was decided by penalty runs after the close of play. The team bowling last deliberately got through their overs so slowly that the batting team was awarded 120 penalty runs, enough to just give them the victory :O

RustyCage wrote:I just read about a first class cricket game in India that was decided by penalty runs after the close of play. The team bowling last deliberately got through their overs so slowly that the batting team was awarded 120 penalty runs, enough to just give them the victory :O

Happened last year in Grade Cricket too. Penalty runs after the game due to slow over rate was the difference.

Aerie wrote:

RustyCage wrote:I just read about a first class cricket game in India that was decided by penalty runs after the close of play. The team bowling last deliberately got through their overs so slowly that the batting team was awarded 120 penalty runs, enough to just give them the victory :O

Happened last year in Grade Cricket too. Penalty runs after the game due to slow over rate was the difference.

Different circumstances Trent Kelly took a heap of wickets in a over to put them behind the rate??

heater31 wrote:

Aerie wrote:

RustyCage wrote:I just read about a first class cricket game in India that was decided by penalty runs after the close of play. The team bowling last deliberately got through their overs so slowly that the batting team was awarded 120 penalty runs, enough to just give them the victory :O

Happened last year in Grade Cricket too. Penalty runs after the game due to slow over rate was the difference.

Different circumstances Trent Kelly took a heap of wickets in a over to put them behind the rate??

Correct, his hat trick that won West Torrens the game, actually made West Torrens lose the game.

helicopterking wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Aerie wrote:

RustyCage wrote:I just read about a first class cricket game in India that was decided by penalty runs after the close of play. The team bowling last deliberately got through their overs so slowly that the batting team was awarded 120 penalty runs, enough to just give them the victory :O

Happened last year in Grade Cricket too. Penalty runs after the game due to slow over rate was the difference.

Different circumstances Trent Kelly took a heap of wickets in a over to put them behind the rate??

Correct, his hat trick that won West Torrens the game, actually made West Torrens lose the game.

Very harsh!

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:ok, I thought the Rolling Stones were taking over the venue .......my mistake

I know the Rolling Stones are very old but it shouldnt take very long to roll them out of the stadium once the concert is finished. Those gophers can go pretty fast these days

Redbacks looking great this season everyone is performing however we may lose a couple to the South African Tour which would be a shame cause if the boys keep up the performances all of them deserve to have there name against a Shield Premiership!