SA Footy

NSW v WA, stumps day two
NSW 8/444 declared
Smith 103
Henriques 91
Cummins 52

WA 1/85, trail by 359

Victoria v Queensland, stump day one
QLD 183
Hemphrey 64
Holland 3/29
Siddle 3/30

Vic 0/5

State of the match 8/726

Brodlach wrote:State of the match 8/726

Should play all games at the GABBA.

What a peach by cooper to get wade out

Armchair expert wrote:What a peach by cooper to get wade out

They should've been retrieving that from the Cathedral balcony.

cricket.com.au live scores:

Victoria Men vs Queensland Bulls

Sounds like the Matador Cup all over again.

Cooper the destroyer

TAS declared 5/345 to set the game up.
SA 1/10 Weatherald out of 4.
Let's see if SA play ball?

80 off the last 10

Armchair expert wrote:80 off the last 10

Probably want 15 minutes at them tonight but I'd be putting a few more on yet.

Will bat tomorrow for at least an hour.

If we wanted to make a game of it, 380-400 off 80 overs?

Note to Peter Handscombe, this is how you go about things if you want both teams to set up a game for a potential result you cockhead.

NSW v WA, stumps day three
WA first innings 191
Short 51
Marsh 43
Cummins 3/31
O'Keefe 3/36

NSW second innings 0/98 declared
Hughes 53*
Henriques 42*

WA second innings 3/28, trail by 323
Starc 2/5

Victoria v Queensland, stumps day two
QLD 183

Vic 9/300 declared
Handscomb 92 (finally makes some runs)
Fraser-McGurk 51 (17 year old on debut)
Swepson 4/75 (including a hatrick)

QLD second innings 1/3, trail by 114

DOC wrote:Will bat tomorrow for at least an hour.

No way, 15 minutes tops, set them 350.

Grenville wrote:Note to Peter Handscombe, this is how you go about things if you want both teams to set up a game for a potential result you cockhead.

Total hats off to Matty Wade, I thought we batted too long for not enough runs to make something of it, unless we thought we could bowl them out cheaply.

First innings are quite pointless nowadays, teams will end up conspiring to declare at 100 each and go from there to get maximum points.

Anyone see the nut Pat Cummins produced to get rid of Cam Green?

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Grenville wrote:Note to Peter Handscombe, this is how you go about things if you want both teams to set up a game for a potential result you cockhead.

Total hats off to Matty Wade, I thought we batted too long for not enough runs to make something of it, unless we thought we could bowl them out cheaply.

First innings are quite pointless nowadays, teams will end up conspiring to declare at 100 each and go from there to get maximum points.

Not quite LM, teams are awarded 0.01 bonus points for every run scored above 200 in the first 100 overs of each innings and 0.1 points for each wicket within those 100 overs.

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Grenville wrote:Note to Peter Handscombe, this is how you go about things if you want both teams to set up a game for a potential result you cockhead.

Total hats off to Matty Wade, I thought we batted too long for not enough runs to make something of it, unless we thought we could bowl them out cheaply.

First innings are quite pointless nowadays, teams will end up conspiring to declare at 100 each and go from there to get maximum points.

Not quite LM, teams are awarded 0.01 bonus points for every run scored above 200 in the first 100 overs of each innings and 0.1 points for each wicket within those 100 overs.

OK, I thought they needed to score at more than 4 an over if they lasted 100 overs, thanks for the clarification.

Should be an entertaining day's cricket

A shame we don't have a frontline spinner. Cooper will have to do the job!