SA Footy

Sharksta wrote:Terrible field placement with less than 2 overs to go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I turned over for a bit because it was frustrating me

9 runs and 1 wicket to go, geez you would hate it if ya slow ass over rate coast you an extra over lol.

Brodlach wrote:

Sharksta wrote:Terrible field placement with less than 2 overs to go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I turned over for a bit because it was frustrating me

Aussies looked like they didn’t want to lose it and weren’t prepared to back themselves to win it. The Aussies were lucky in my opinion. Bowled too short then set defensive fields and ensured the poms stayed in it. I’m an Aussie through and through but feel it’s a bit of a shame the team that made all the running didn’t get rewarded.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sharksta wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

Sharksta wrote:Terrible field placement with less than 2 overs to go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I turned over for a bit because it was frustrating me

Aussies looked like they didn’t want to lose it and weren’t prepared to back themselves to win it. The Aussies were lucky in my opinion. Bowled too short then set defensive fields and ensured the poms stayed in it. I’m an Aussie through and through but feel it’s a bit of a shame the team that made all the running didn’t get rewarded.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Australia didn't go as hard for the win because of the way the series is set up. With the draw, they only have to win one of the ODIs to clinch the series. I'm sure that's why they didn't attack as much as we wanted them to. England's run chase waz sensational, but I'm not sure you can say they made all the running when Australia declared twice. At the end of the day England got themselves into a winning position, but couldn't go on with it. It was great viewing.

Poms had it won and dead set CHOKED
43 needed off 48 balls with 7 wickets in hand. and 2 set batters.
Didn't need to do anything stupid at all but threw their wickets away with stupid shots after batting so well to get in a winning position.

jackpot jim wrote:Poms had it won and dead set CHOKED
43 needed off 48 balls with 7 wickets in hand. and 2 set batters.
Didn't need to do anything stupid at all but threw their wickets away with stupid shots after batting so well to get in a winning position.

It was even worse, they needed 45 off 60 and the next two overs went for just 1 each.

WC Final on right now

Aus 0/49 (12)

1/237, 40.2 overs, these girls are incredible

stampy wrote:1/237, 40.2 overs, these girls are incredible

1/301 with 6 overs to go.
The Poms are arguing in the field and imploding big time

Poms sent us in too

stampy wrote:1/237, 40.2 overs, these girls are incredible

Now 1/315 from 45 overs, Healy 170* (136)

healy out for 170, magnificent knock, has a sore back too apparently

would have been great if mrs starc got 200

Aus finish on 6/356, 15 off the last over.

Poms 1/34 off 6.

CMON Aussies

Eng 4/179 after 27

Schriver on fire 72 off 71, this games far from over

7/213

Sciver 98*

needed 144 from 98

World Champions

Watched some of this a work today, Healy was phenomenal

locky801 wrote:Healy gone for a pair, hasnt scored a run all summer, time to move her on

9th wicket partnership of 100 for England has put them right back in this match

29/1/2022 Mrs Starc made those ducks
4/3/2022 Mrs STARc makes 170 off 138 balls in a World Cup

That's the best innings Ive seen by the Invincigals in a limited overs match
Then I saw the best innings from an English gal by Natalie Sciver 148 not out off 121 balls

mal wrote:

locky801 wrote:Healy gone for a pair, hasnt scored a run all summer, time to move her on

9th wicket partnership of 100 for England has put them right back in this match

29/1/2022 Mrs Starc made those ducks
4/3/2022 Mrs STARc makes 170 off 138 balls in a World Cup

That's the best innings Ive seen by the Invincigals in a limited overs match
Then I saw the best innings from an English gal by Natalie Sciver 148 not out off 121 balls

Hope for Aaron Finch still then i guess