Down the Hill wrote:I've never seen this Hackham lad play but it is the same lad involved with all these incidents. It appears the umpires themselves are intimidated to take any real proper action against him which just angers everyone else at the ground. I believe the Cove waterboy was a minor as well, so I don't think it was an adult assaulting a kid. We copped our punishment after the regrettable incident a fortnight ago but its now happened again at their next home game involving the same player. Where's our friend with his moving Heavy Metal Avatar with his comment on this one.
Cyclops, if you saw a physically mature 16 year old kid bullying or belting a smaller 16 year old, wouldn't you step in to protect the smaller kid and probably give a clip to the other one in the process. I'm not saying this can be carried out on the sporting field but its not as simple as saying that an adult can't touch a kid. There are plenty of 14 to 17 year kids who deserve to cop the shoe on the other foot and receive the same treatment as to what they hand out to others.
Here i am mate. I wasnt at the 16s game this week so all i know about it is what i was told when i got there just before the B grade. This is what i have heard. The hackham player was sticking up for a smaller hackham player in a wrestle. Im not sure if punches were thrown, but from watching a fair bit of the 16s this year im yet to see him punch someone. Its mostly words and a bit of push and shove.
I totally agree with cyclops as well. You can break up a fight without throwing punches. So if you punch a kid, your a gutless wanker. I boundry umpired for the 16s early in the year and the same hackham player was racially abused by the oposition runner from the bench. He is targeted by teams and provoked.
This might seem like a biased opinion but i hate my club coming into the spotlight for these reasons and if i genuinely believed the Hackham player was totally at fault i would say so.



