by asert » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:45 pm
by petoe » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:04 pm
by AFLflyer » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:26 pm
petoe wrote:With Brighton already travelling along nicely, a welcome addition soon if all goes well would be the one and only Troy Butcher. Played his first game on the weekend (B Grade) Best on Ground and 4 goals....
by SFL SPY » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:26 pm
petoe wrote:With Brighton already travelling along nicely, a welcome addition soon if all goes well would be the one and only Troy Butcher. Played his first game on the weekend (B Grade) Best on Ground and 4 goals....
by the observer » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:40 pm
by Down the Hill » Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:48 pm
by rodney fox » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:08 pm
Down the Hill wrote:Troy and his brother had to return to WA at short notice in April for family/personal reasons. Troy has been playing for his old local club (yes he was cleared) and returned to SA recently (cleared back on the significant change of location rule). He did play B grade on Saturday and was a class above in difficult windy conditions. The SFL probably hasn't seen the best of Troy but the facts are that he has played in 3 senior WAFL premierships with East Perth and represented the WAFL so his best was, or is, clearly very very good. Reynella people will at least concede that he was one of their best in the 2007 Prelim Final loss to Brighton and if he can replicate that form he could be a handy addition come finals if his body is right. He is not being treated as the great white hope because we have been winning games with at least 4 or 5 down from our best 21 most weeks, however just adds further depth to our Senior list come finals time. Unlike some clubs, the Bombers won't compromise selection on reputation alone.

by rodney fox » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:10 pm
the observer wrote:The oval is about 2 weeks from being handed back over Top dressed today rolling it tommorrow and fertilizing it and a final inspection in the next two weeks Maybe last minor round or finals seem assured. Will be in terrific condition if all goes well.
by cyclops » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:33 pm
by skeletal system » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:11 pm
by BAZZA13 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:12 pm
cyclops wrote:news flash-to everyone on the forum,darren mason is probably the hardest and toughest player in the sfl(i would bak mase in against any1) if u are gona start any kind of sh#t against c/beach i would be lookn over me shoulder.this bloke will absolutely annihalate anything or any1 that gets in his way.people believe me and if u dont then good luk.
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:16 pm
asert wrote:no idea just what i was sent the other day about how our sun teams play sun all year then if we make it have to play a sat grand final and have most of the team unavail as this is why they play sun football in the first place
by Lunchbox Legend » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:21 pm
Down the Hill wrote:I've never seen this Hackham lad play but it is the same lad involved with all these incidents. It appears the umpires themselves are intimidated to take any real proper action against him which just angers everyone else at the ground. I believe the Cove waterboy was a minor as well, so I don't think it was an adult assaulting a kid. We copped our punishment after the regrettable incident a fortnight ago but its now happened again at their next home game involving the same player. Where's our friend with his moving Heavy Metal Avatar with his comment on this one.
Cyclops, if you saw a physically mature 16 year old kid bullying or belting a smaller 16 year old, wouldn't you step in to protect the smaller kid and probably give a clip to the other one in the process. I'm not saying this can be carried out on the sporting field but its not as simple as saying that an adult can't touch a kid. There are plenty of 14 to 17 year kids who deserve to cop the shoe on the other foot and receive the same treatment as to what they hand out to others.
by cyclops » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:35 pm
BAZZA13 wrote:cyclops wrote:news flash-to everyone on the forum,darren mason is probably the hardest and toughest player in the sfl(i would bak mase in against any1) if u are gona start any kind of sh#t against c/beach i would be lookn over me shoulder.this bloke will absolutely annihalate anything or any1 that gets in his way.people believe me and if u dont then good luk.
Tough words on the net bro...
by cyclops » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:37 pm
skeletal system wrote:Its a pitty that he is a dud football player though cyclops.
Maybe he should concentrate on that part of his game?
by White Line Fever » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:38 pm
asert wrote:SOUTHERN FOOTBALL LEAGUE 2009 FINALS SERIES VENUE HOSTING GATES OPEN
Qual (1) 1st V 4th SATURDAY 29/08/2009 NOARLUNGA NOARLUNGA 7.00AM
Qual (2) 2nd V 3rd SATURDAY 29/08/2009 ALDINGA ALDINGA 7.00AM
Elim (1)5th V 8th SUNDAY 30/08/2009 PORT NOARLUNGA PORT NOARLUNGA 7.00AM
Elim (2)6th V 7th SUNDAY 30/08/2009 CHRISTIES BEACH CHRISTIES BEACH 7.00AM
SF (1) Loser QF1 V Winner EF 1 SATURDAY 5/09/2009 NOARLUNGA NOARLUNGA 7.00AM
SF (2)Loser QF 2 V Winner EF 2 SUNDAY 6/09/2009 ALDINGA ALDINGA 7.00AM
PF(1)WinnerQF1 V Winner SF 2 SATURDAY 12/09/2009 PORT NOARLUNGA PORT NOARLUNGA 7.00AM
PF (2)Winner QF2 V Winner SF1 SUNDAY 13/09/2009 CHRISTIES BEACH CHRISTIES BEACH 7.00AM
GF Winner PF1 V Winner PF2 SATURDAY 19/09/2009 SOUTH ADELAIDE F.C. 1 TBA 6.30 AM
GRAND FINAL AT SAFC 2 TBA
STARTING TIMES. 1/4 LENGTHS. 3 TBA
4x15 no time on U14 8.00a.m. 4x15 no time on
4x18 no time on. U16 9.20 a.m. 4x18 no time on.
4x20 no time on U18 10.55 a.m. 4x20 no time on
4x20 no time on 'B' 12.35 p.m. 4x20 no time on
4x22 plus time on 'A' 2.30 p.m. 4x22 plus time on
TIMES FOR C GRADE & UNDER 14 & 16 SUNDAY FINALS FIXTURES & HOST GATES OPEN
1ST SEMI 09.00 am - Under 14's Sunday 3rd V 4th FLAGSTAFF HILL FLAGSTAFF HILL SUNDAY 27/8/2006 7.30 am
10.20 am - Under 16's Sunday 3rd V 4th FLAGSTAFF HILL FLAGSTAFF HILL SUNDAY 27/8/2006 23/08/2009
12.00 noon - C Grade 3rd V 4th FLAGSTAFF HILL FLAGSTAFF HILL SUNDAY 27/8/2006 23/08/2009
2ND SEMI 09.00 am - Under 14's Sunday 1st V 2nd REYNELLA REYNELLA SUNDAY 27/8/2006 7.30 am
10.20 am - Under 16's Sunday 1st V 2nd REYNELLA REYNELLA SUNDAY 27/8/2006 23/08/2009
12.00 noon - C Grade 1st V 2nd REYNELLA REYNELLA SUNDAY 27/8/2006 23/08/2009
PRELIM 09.00 am - Under 14's Sunday Winner 1st Semi V Loser 2nd Semi FLAGSTAFF HILL FLAGSTAFF HILL SUNDAY 7.30 am
10.20 am - Under 16's Sunday Winner 1st Semi V Loser 2nd Semi FLAGSTAFF HILL FLAGSTAFF HILL SUNDAY 30/08/2009
12.00 noon - C Grade Winner 1st Semi V Loser 2nd Semi FLAGSTAFF HILL FLAGSTAFF HILL SUNDAY 30/08/2009
G/FINAL 3.45pm Winner 2nd Semi V Winner Preliminary HAPPY VALLEY HAPPY VALLEY Saturday 3.00pm
Start times changed to 5.15pm Winner 2nd Semi V Winner Preliminary HAPPY VALLEY HAPPY VALLEY Saturday 5/09/2009
dated 26/7/2009 7.00PM Winner 2nd Semi V Winner Preliminary HAPPY VALLEY HAPPY VALLEY Saturday 5/09/2009
U14 Su GF Start 3.45pm Finish 5.00pm plus 10 minutes for Presentation
U16 SU GF Start 5.15pm Finish 6.45 pm plus 10 minutes for Presentation
C Grade GF Start 7.00pm Finish 8.35pm plus 10 minutes for Presentation
by reppoh_eht » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:21 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:asert wrote:no idea just what i was sent the other day about how our sun teams play sun all year then if we make it have to play a sat grand final and have most of the team unavail as this is why they play sun football in the first place
No they play Sunday because they cannot make the Saturday side, or are you stacking your Sunday side?
by Esteban Vihaio » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:30 pm
reppoh_eht wrote:
Totally wrong there LGIL, the Sunday sides (especially at Flagstaff Hill) are not looked at as a 'Second Side', they are there for everyone to get a game, so players that are unavailable on a Saturday can still play club football.
These players may be unavailable for many reasons which change each week, but the majority are college footballers, so changing finals to a Saturday is most definatly going to have an impact on the competition.
Without our two Sunday sides this year we would have easily 10-15 players that would not have played a game for FHFC all season, this way they still get to play for Flaggies (or what ever club they are at), and won't go running off to a SAAFL team who play there major junior comp on a Sunday. Flaggies personally have lost countless players since 2000 because we have not had Sunday sides, we now do and hopefully will stop loosing players to other clubs in the Junior ranks.
by HH3 » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:34 pm
Lunchbox Legend wrote:Down the Hill wrote:I've never seen this Hackham lad play but it is the same lad involved with all these incidents. It appears the umpires themselves are intimidated to take any real proper action against him which just angers everyone else at the ground. I believe the Cove waterboy was a minor as well, so I don't think it was an adult assaulting a kid. We copped our punishment after the regrettable incident a fortnight ago but its now happened again at their next home game involving the same player. Where's our friend with his moving Heavy Metal Avatar with his comment on this one.
Cyclops, if you saw a physically mature 16 year old kid bullying or belting a smaller 16 year old, wouldn't you step in to protect the smaller kid and probably give a clip to the other one in the process. I'm not saying this can be carried out on the sporting field but its not as simple as saying that an adult can't touch a kid. There are plenty of 14 to 17 year kids who deserve to cop the shoe on the other foot and receive the same treatment as to what they hand out to others.
I think that it is a disgrace that Hackham allow this lad to behave this way week in and week out. If Hackham are serious about rebuilding the club this needs to be stopped. The lad's coach should sort the problem, and not as I've been told, encourage the thuggery. I spoke to Denis Ker late last year or earlier this year and told him of this lad and his sniping. I tried to explain that as long as the club allows this sort of thing they would never gain respect as a club. The actions of someone like this means that he becomes the lowest common denominator on which everyone bases their opinion of the club. You will continue to be called ferals as long as you allow this behaviour. Come on Thommo and Kery tidy this up. If it means telling this lad to piss off, so be it. The club is greater than any individual. I also question the umpires who do nothing about it each week. Surely the SFL are aware of this by now as well. Perhaps "duty of care" should be mentioned. Why don't opposition teams start reporting this lad? The SFL's standing in the football community isn't that flash now. Fix it.
by AFLflyer » Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:06 pm
Football
Other Footy Leagues
SFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

