by Vulcan » Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:28 am
by special » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:10 pm
Vulcan wrote:So Marion are on the improve which can only be good for the competition,so what is going on at all the other 15 clubs?
by zedman » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:12 pm
adelaide bank wrote:Lynch and linke are the two recruits from tailem both past players from Marion and both looking good and fitting in well
by Moe » Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:53 pm
by KEYDEFENDER » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:35 pm
spanner wrote:special wrote:spanner wrote:GO THE PUNT wrote:Mr juicy you needed to recruit its a bit hard to develop juniors when you don't have them so keep up the good work and get marion back on track. And if in two years it hasn't worked get one of these critics to take the job on and do better. People don't understand seniors need to be very competative first to attract kids that will then carry the clyb forward in years to come. Marion are up against strong competition for these kids and yes they made mistakes before but thats the past keep the boat going forward. Also in 2000 your b grade played brighton and won by a point and was lucky to do so as a few brighton boys crumbled under pressure.
Heard a rumore today that a sfl club may be loosing their key forward to the hills league.Its a middle range club and if so it will hurt them.
Not all due to the pressure i belive there was a knee that crumbled as well wasnt there GTP
And the only thing that could put it back in was an escort blue
b grade beat brighton cos of morrissy, farrow and beckman great last halves this was the main reason for that GF win
NFI!!
sometimes teams lose the game
sometimes teams win the game
Brighton lost the game
by spot on » Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:58 pm
Moe wrote:For the love of Christ, can we get off Exelby.
The poor blokes life is crap at the moment.
Beautiful partner, lovely kids, great job, good coaching position at a club he loves with a clubrooms to die for, & 3.6 million dollars to spend on recruiting.
My god, he is under more pressure to perform than when Nathan Buckley takes over from Strauchnie![]()
Here it is in black & white:
Marion WILL be better.
Morphies WILL be not.
Brighton WILL still be good & WILL still be an arrogant buch of $%^&'s
Edwardstown WILL not care.
Because i am from "down"the hill, i will not predict what goes on in hillbilly land, except to say that Happy Valley will falter, & Flagstaff Hill will improve.
Good luck to M/vale too. Dunno why, but i have some small kind of respect for that club
by HappyWanderer » Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:11 pm
spot on wrote:Moe wrote:For the love of Christ, can we get off Exelby.
The poor blokes life is crap at the moment.
Beautiful partner, lovely kids, great job, good coaching position at a club he loves with a clubrooms to die for, & 3.6 million dollars to spend on recruiting.
My god, he is under more pressure to perform than when Nathan Buckley takes over from Strauchnie![]()
Here it is in black & white:
Marion WILL be better.
Morphies WILL be not.
Brighton WILL still be good & WILL still be an arrogant buch of $%^&'s
Edwardstown WILL not care.
Because i am from "down"the hill, i will not predict what goes on in hillbilly land, except to say that Happy Valley will falter, & Flagstaff Hill will improve.
Good luck to M/vale too. Dunno why, but i have some small kind of respect for that club
Some pretty good hillbillys down this way Moe
by KungFu Panda » Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:13 pm
by Moe » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:12 am
KungFu Panda wrote:So I can take it the Sharks will be crap again then
by The Yetti » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:28 am
by shoe boy » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:41 am
The Yetti wrote:It is now 2010.
For you wonderful Reynella underachievers......
33 years since the last A Grade premiership
by KungFu Panda » Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:04 am
by shoe boy » Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:11 am
KungFu Panda wrote:Im surprised you havent set up a toll on the foot bridge down at shoe land so these intruding clubs have to pay a fee to run up the hill.could be a good money spinner.
by petoe » Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:40 pm
by special » Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:36 pm
petoe wrote:A lot of talk this time of year is how many numbers teams are getting on the track for pre season.
My question is, its all well and good to have big numbers out to most sessions but it doesnt guarantee you the premiership, but does having minimal numbers out to most sessions, guarantee you to not win the premiership?
Those that know, in the last 15 years or so for the clubs that have won the premiership what were pre season numbers like? Im guessing large, surely no one has won it having 25 guys or less out for pre season.
by The Yetti » Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:02 pm
shoe boy wrote:KungFu Panda wrote:Im surprised you havent set up a toll on the foot bridge down at shoe land so these intruding clubs have to pay a fee to run up the hill.could be a good money spinner.
Now theres an idea! and entrance to market square!
by enjoythegame » Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:57 am
The Yetti wrote:It is now 2010.
For you wonderful Reynella underachievers......
33 years since the last A Grade premiership
by The Yetti » Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:23 am
enjoythegame wrote:The Yetti wrote:It is now 2010.
For you wonderful Reynella underachievers......
33 years since the last A Grade premiership
Did you work that out for yourself Yetti, 32+1=33 I gather that would of taken someone like you a few hours. Think of something original its getting boring.
by t express » Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:43 pm
by ddonkey » Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:19 pm
t express wrote:YETTI = is marked with a lack of intelligence and annoying,stupefied,worthless,
Football
Other Footy Leagues
SFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

