asert wrote:fisho mcspaz wrote:MatteeG wrote:fisho mcspaz wrote:I really don't understand why the SFL doesn't go back to two divs. Whenever I voice this opinion people say the same thing, 'Oh, so-and-so club (usually Marion or Flagstaff Hill) wouldn't like it.'
Absolute rubbish Fisho. The reason the 2 div thing never worked was because there was no promotion/relegation.
Not because some clubs 'didnt like it'
No-one likes to be in div 2, however it can be a way for the weaker senior sides to enjoy some success and have a realistic shot at finals/flag.
Remember Flaggies were in Div 2 for a few years before the whole comp went back to 1 div.
Fair enough - this was all before my time, I have no idea who played in what div for the most part.My point was that no one ever seemed to be able to give a good reason why the league wouldn't go back to two divs. Anyway, I think I've got my answer now. No promotion/relegation, sure, but isn't that symptomatic of the SFL's lack of organisation in general?
I just really hope that something concrete happens within the next couple of years to resolve the current situation - which is, in a nutshell, 30-40 goal margins between the top and bottom sides of the competition. Splitting the league into two divs is the most viable solution in my opinion. But something's got to happen. The bottom sides are giving their absolute all to keep on going, and I think there's a lot to admire there, but if the competition stays the way it is they'll just flicker out eventually - and there's no dignity in that.
Thing is fisho we finished 12th last year but beat hackham by 31 goals with a few out. You go to two divs and it will still happen.
Maybe... I still think it'd be for the best though. Feel free to tell me if I'm wrong here because I've never had anything to do with the administration of a business/club/other organisation in any shape or form. But the way I see it, if there were only eight or so teams in a competition instead of fifteen, the league* would be able to devote more time and effort to ensuring a more even competition, and the individual clubs would have something concrete to aim at as well.
*Ideally the current league admin wouldn't be running both divs, you'd hope there'd be two separate committees.
Getting thrashed by seven other teams would be pretty crap, sure, but getting thrashed by fourteen... you can't get your head around that. A club that's down near the bottom of the ladder is likely going to be struggling financially as well - and fourteen teams, that's a long ladder. The top's that far away it's not even worth aiming at. So why not plug what money you've got into trying to beat the next couple of teams above you? At least that's a feasible goal. I remember when Aldinga beat the Twisties in '07 and it was like the bloody Grand Final. Unfortunately in the bigger scheme of things - including finals aspirations - well, it's just money down a rabbit hole, isn't it? But what can you do?
It might work and it might not, but I still say two divs are better than one.



