SA Footy

Q. wrote:

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Q. wrote:Geez, not a bad start with Pendles, Langdon and Sandi. Walters a bit of a letdown.

Control your orgasms Q. Everyone had those 3.

Langdon and Sandi were locks. Many would have left Pendles out. Beamer was an absolute lock at his price.

I'll stick to my no tattoo policy thank you.

Got Beams, Pendlebury, Sandilands and Pavlich

Have Langdon on my bench as emergency so ill make sure I have a mid who doesn't play

I only managed 392 from Swan, Toovey, Sheridan, Sandilands and Pavlich in my Supercoach debut tonight. I suppose I have to start from somewhere....

I had Pav's 80 too. What was up with his kicking?

It's only round one though, doesn't mean shit if they don't score when you have an opponent.

Failed Creation wrote:I only managed 392 from Swan, Toovey, Sheridan, Sandilands and Pavlich in my Supercoach debut tonight. I suppose I have to start from somewhere....

Not sure why but I considered Toovey, but glad I didnt go down that track.

Had Pav...could have been a 110 plus score if he had of converted. All good, he will be better for the run.

Most players scored as expected tonight, was about to trade Fyfe in at the last moment but decided against. I would have been knocking down Ross Lyon's door if I did! Subbed out and he was having a monster!

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Q. wrote:

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

Q. wrote:Geez, not a bad start with Pendles, Langdon and Sandi. Walters a bit of a letdown.

Control your orgasms Q. Everyone had those 3.

Langdon and Sandi were locks. Many would have left Pendles out. Beamer was an absolute lock at his price.

I'll stick to my no tattoo policy thank you.

That rules out most if the AFL

One Club Player wrote:I had Pav's 80 too. What was up with his kicking?

It was woeful, wasn't it?

Masha wrote:Not sure why but I considered Toovey, but glad I didnt go down that track.

That's one mistake I wish I hadn't made...

whufc wrote:Got Beams, Pendlebury, Sandilands and Pavlich

Have Langdon on my bench as emergency so ill make sure I have a mid who doesn't play

You picked him as a mid?

The Sleeping Giant wrote:

whufc wrote:Got Beams, Pendlebury, Sandilands and Pavlich

Have Langdon on my bench as emergency so ill make sure I have a mid who doesn't play

You picked him as a mid?

Oops sorry in defence

One Club Player wrote:

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
I'll stick to my no tattoo policy thank you.

That rules out most if the AFL

Plenty of clean skins out there. The other year my missus joined a league and I picked all red heads or players that played like red heads. The Rocky Dennis's.

263 out of Beams and Sandi- pretty happy with that start.

Had Langdon on the pine for his 111. Hopefully McDonald can nudge around the 90 mark as my D6.

Having a look at the SC page, and it doesn't look like you can list a benchie as your (c) this year to take advantage of a high (vc) score. Hopefully GAJ can pump out more than 127!

^^ you have to put the C on a player on the field for the loophole to work

But that defeats the purpose doesnt it Q? Wouldn't you get that players score if you put the (c) on a player who was on the field?

valleys07 wrote:But that defeats the purpose doesnt it Q? Wouldn't you get that players score if you put the (c) on a player who was on the field?

Yes, but the second crucial part of the loophole is having a playing emergency to give you a replacement score for the bogus captain who scores zero.

fish wrote:

valleys07 wrote:But that defeats the purpose doesnt it Q? Wouldn't you get that players score if you put the (c) on a player who was on the field?

Yes, but the second crucial part of the loophole is having a playing emergency to give you a replacement score for the bogus captain who scores zero.

OK- makes sense, but wouldnt you then get the playing emergencies score as your (C)?

valleys07 wrote:

fish wrote:

valleys07 wrote:But that defeats the purpose doesnt it Q? Wouldn't you get that players score if you put the (c) on a player who was on the field?

Yes, but the second crucial part of the loophole is having a playing emergency to give you a replacement score for the bogus captain who scores zero.

OK- makes sense, but wouldnt you then get the playing emergencies score as your (C)?

Nope. If your C scores zero you get your VC score x2. Plus the emergency score in place of your C

Awesome!

Onya Fish- thanks for that mate.

So my next conundrum...

Switch Minson and Derickx with the (E) on Minson and the (c) on Derickx and take the 127, or let GAJ ride.....

valleys07 wrote:So my next conundrum...

Switch Minson and Derickx with the (E) on Minson and the (c) on Derickx and take the 127, or let GAJ ride.....

I would take the 127...