SA Footy

Booney wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:We need differing opinions by different posters otherwise it’s as boring as bat shit on here.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. I'm all for differing opinions on subjective matters, it's part of learning and living. Arguing against facts is another matter, the worst part of conspiracy theorists ( for want of a better term here ) is they can't substantiate a counter argument with fact, its all Facebook, Youtube and anytime you offer them facts it's fake or formulated to appease the masses. It's a cop out from actually providing evidence, fact based evidence, the contrary. It's easy being a conspiracy theorist because you just call everything bullshit and it suits your narrative. Don't have to be very smart to do that.

Lightning McQueen wrote:
OK fella, I gave in and watched. Yes, it had a different level of force on it to what I had previously seen, very stupid though, a closed fist to the face of a police horse, he needs so time away IMO.

amber_fluid wrote:

Booney wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:We need differing opinions by different posters otherwise it’s as boring as bat shit on here.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. I'm all for differing opinions on subjective matters, it's part of learning and living. Arguing against facts is another matter, the worst part of conspiracy theorists ( for want of a better term here ) is they can't substantiate a counter argument with fact, its all Facebook, Youtube and anytime you offer them facts it's fake or formulated to appease the masses. It's a cop out from actually providing evidence, fact based evidence, the contrary. It's easy being a conspiracy theorist because you just call everything bullshit and it suits your narrative. Don't have to be very smart to do that.

Agree.
But as I have said before deciphering between fact and fiction is getting so much harder today due to fake news.

Even harder to understand is Covid ‘facts’ as the goal posts are changing as data and new knowledge comes to light.

Booney wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:We need differing opinions by different posters otherwise it’s as boring as bat shit on here.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. I'm all for differing opinions on subjective matters, it's part of learning and living. Arguing against facts is another matter, the worst part of conspiracy theorists ( for want of a better term here ) is they can't substantiate a counter argument with fact, its all Facebook, Youtube and anytime you offer them facts it's fake or formulated to appease the masses. It's a cop out from actually providing evidence, fact based evidence, the contrary. It's easy being a conspiracy theorist because you just call everything bullshit and it suits your narrative. Don't have to be very smart to do that.

gadj1976 wrote:

Booney wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:We need differing opinions by different posters otherwise it’s as boring as bat shit on here.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. I'm all for differing opinions on subjective matters, it's part of learning and living. Arguing against facts is another matter, the worst part of conspiracy theorists ( for want of a better term here ) is they can't substantiate a counter argument with fact, its all Facebook, Youtube and anytime you offer them facts it's fake or formulated to appease the masses. It's a cop out from actually providing evidence, fact based evidence, the contrary. It's easy being a conspiracy theorist because you just call everything bullshit and it suits your narrative. Don't have to be very smart to do that.

Am I allowed to differ from your differing opinion?

am Bays wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:
OK fella, I gave in and watched. Yes, it had a different level of force on it to what I had previously seen, very stupid though, a closed fist to the face of a police horse, he needs so time away IMO.

Reckless, High contact Medium impact, 3 weeks down to 2 with a guilty plea but six months added on for being a F***tard

Apachebulldog wrote:I finally have found video vision of the horse supposedly being punched by a protester in Sydney some sites will not show it.

By only the still photo evidence it is definitely not a good look.

I think Daisies assessment on the media is quite correct scum media as per usual they sensationalise a story.

From what i can see in this vid the mans hand was in a formed fist but his left arm was fully extended and looks like he was fending off the horses head i cannot see where he has actually taken a swing at the horse.

Any way my two bobs worth may be it should be referred to the AFL VCR Panel for adjudication.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-ac ... b9339869d1

Lightning McQueen wrote:

am Bays wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:
OK fella, I gave in and watched. Yes, it had a different level of force on it to what I had previously seen, very stupid though, a closed fist to the face of a police horse, he needs so time away IMO.

Reckless, High contact Medium impact, 3 weeks down to 2 with a guilty plea but six months added on for being a F***tard

His club is trying to downgrade it citing that it was only horseplay.

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

Or, to keep in context, their horse.

Pseudo wrote:

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

Or, to keep in context, their horse.

Well if the copper was in a relationship with the horse then I guess the analogy carries more water.

amber_fluid wrote:

Pseudo wrote:

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

Or, to keep in context, their horse.

Well if the copper was in a relationship with the horse then I guess the analogy carries more water.

Why wasn’t the son included?
Sexist?

Dutchy wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

stan wrote:This is the greatest thread on this site.

This is just a tribute!!

under rated post

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

Or, to keep in context, their horse.

whufc wrote:
Push my horse and I’m not responsible when it gallops all 500kg straight at you

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

Or, to keep in context, their horse.

amber_fluid wrote:

Booney wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:We need differing opinions by different posters otherwise it’s as boring as bat shit on here.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. I'm all for differing opinions on subjective matters, it's part of learning and living. Arguing against facts is another matter, the worst part of conspiracy theorists ( for want of a better term here ) is they can't substantiate a counter argument with fact, its all Facebook, Youtube and anytime you offer them facts it's fake or formulated to appease the masses. It's a cop out from actually providing evidence, fact based evidence, the contrary. It's easy being a conspiracy theorist because you just call everything bullshit and it suits your narrative. Don't have to be very smart to do that.

Agree.
But as I have said before deciphering between fact and fiction is getting so much harder today due to fake news.

Even harder to understand is Covid ‘facts’ as the goal posts are changing as data and new knowledge comes to light.

The Bedge wrote:I think sport will resume this weekend - why? A lot of us get caught up with our own senior competitions and forget about the kids. SANFL Juniors only has a month left of games (+finals for the higher age groups), i'm sure other winter sports are similar.

This is the demographic we really want and need playing sport still, and some dont play a summer sport, so think SA Gov would be eager to get these kids back out there to enjoy what's left of their season sooner rather than later.

Booney wrote:

tigerpie wrote:

Booney wrote:Wonder how these blokes would feel if I "fended off" their Mum, wife or daughter?

Or, to keep in context, their horse.

My point is about showing respect.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

whufc wrote:
Push my horse and I’m not responsible when it gallops all 500kg straight at you

That would be the mane danger.