Page 703 of 785

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 4:27 pm
by locky801
Psyber wrote:
I thought we are taking a bit of a risk with launching the current opening up now rather than waiting until mid-January, and now some more shut downs may happen in the new year. I suspect the decision has been driven by politician concern over elections due in early 2022 at both federal and state level, and the motivation is to avoid hostility over spoiling Christmas for the voters. It may backfire...


You have that right, totally trying to put political careers in front of community safety, certainly ahs backfired, guess the elections will show how much

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 4:38 pm
by Jim05
locky801 wrote:
Psyber wrote:
I thought we are taking a bit of a risk with launching the current opening up now rather than waiting until mid-January, and now some more shut downs may happen in the new year. I suspect the decision has been driven by politician concern over elections due in early 2022 at both federal and state level, and the motivation is to avoid hostility over spoiling Christmas for the voters. It may backfire...


You have that right, totally trying to put political careers in front of community safety, certainly ahs backfired, guess the elections will show how much
About time we opened up. Hospital cases aren’t rising and the vax is doing its job.
Time to stop wasting resources on stupid tests and isolation and just get on with things

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 4:58 pm
by amber_fluid
Jim05 wrote:
locky801 wrote:
Psyber wrote:
I thought we are taking a bit of a risk with launching the current opening up now rather than waiting until mid-January, and now some more shut downs may happen in the new year. I suspect the decision has been driven by politician concern over elections due in early 2022 at both federal and state level, and the motivation is to avoid hostility over spoiling Christmas for the voters. It may backfire...


You have that right, totally trying to put political careers in front of community safety, certainly ahs backfired, guess the elections will show how much
About time we opened up. Hospital cases aren’t rising and the vax is doing its job.
Time to stop wasting resources on stupid tests and isolation and just get on with things


Spot on Jim!
Life goes on……………

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 5:02 pm
by Armchair expert
There is a lag between cases and hospitalisations

see how we are doing in 2 weeks time

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 5:04 pm
by Jim05
Armchair expert wrote:There is a lag between cases and hospitalisations

see how we are doing in 2 weeks time
NSW are a good yardstick and their hospitalisations aren’t rising.
Omicron appears to be the dominant strain in SA but appears far milder

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 5:14 pm
by Armchair expert
Jim05 wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:There is a lag between cases and hospitalisations

see how we are doing in 2 weeks time
NSW are a good yardstick and their hospitalisations aren’t rising.
Omicron appears to be the dominant strain in SA but appears far milder


They have 8k in "In Home Hospital"

which would require a lot of resources

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 5:24 pm
by daysofourlives
Jim05 wrote:
locky801 wrote:
Psyber wrote:
I thought we are taking a bit of a risk with launching the current opening up now rather than waiting until mid-January, and now some more shut downs may happen in the new year. I suspect the decision has been driven by politician concern over elections due in early 2022 at both federal and state level, and the motivation is to avoid hostility over spoiling Christmas for the voters. It may backfire...


You have that right, totally trying to put political careers in front of community safety, certainly ahs backfired, guess the elections will show how much
About time we opened up. Hospital cases aren’t rising and the vax is doing its job.
Time to stop wasting resources on stupid tests and isolation and just get on with things


Took ya 2 years but ya got there in the end :D

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 5:26 pm
by daysofourlives
Thoughts are with Wedgie at this tough time.

Can you confirm that the ALH Group are not going to mandate the jab for entry?

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 5:44 pm
by amber_fluid
daysofourlives wrote:Thoughts are with Wedgie at this tough time.

Can you confirm that the ALH Group are not going to mandate the jab for entry?


:lol:
Pop in for a beer and see if he throws you out like he said

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 6:14 pm
by locky801
Lets move the goalposts again, but we still need to wear masks

From 4.42pm on 24 December 2021:
Casual Contacts are no longer required to undertake a COVID-19 PCR test unless they begin developing any of the symptoms below, even if mild, as soon as symptoms appear:
fever (a temperature of 37.5˚C or higher) or chills
cough
loss of taste or smell
sore throat
tiredness (fatigue)
runny or blocked nose
shortness of breath (difficulty breathing)
nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea
headache
muscle or joint pain
loss of appetite
Vaccinated Close Contacts are no longer required to undertake a COVID-19 PCR test on the 13th day after exposure.
Unvaccinated Close Contacts are no longer required to undertake a COVID-19 PCR test on the 6th day after exposure.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 6:45 pm
by Wedgie
daysofourlives wrote:Thoughts are with Wedgie at this tough time.

Can you confirm that the ALH Group are not going to mandate the jab for entry?

Noone is, the option was pushed back to the new year by the government today.
An email we received said they probably would in January or February so no I can't confirm what you said.

It's a weird one as Marshall said the delay was to stop growth of Covid but what's worse for growth, having unvaxxed people in pubs or having fully vaxxed people only and having the option to stand up with full capacity?
Maybe NYE influenced their choice?

Thanks for the kind thoughts though! :D
It's actually been an easy time this week, numbers are down due to Covid.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 7:49 pm
by daysofourlives

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 8:03 pm
by DOC
Is that a link to a big tough guy who stole a vacuum cleaner from an old widow and bragged about it?

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 8:05 pm
by Vamos
Jase wrote:So went to a families place for our annual Christmas party with all the kids, 4 families an excellent evening had by all...

Got a message from the hosts this morning advising that their boy had been at OSHC on the Tuesday and one of the workers had covid.

So we are playing the waiting game now to see if anyone gets symptoms...

Merry Christmas everyone...


Largs Bay OSH?

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:15 pm
by stan
daysofourlives wrote:https://cmnnews.org/story/letter-from-a-doctor-to-a-health-minister-T7iSvHSp3c1aADxdwCvoD?fbclid=IwAR06K7rdruIoNyHbU828yKU_hEi24BPqUeKQ6O7Y0RsfJmdFg58jOzxvJsE
Plenty of people in the same situation. Can't argue with what he is saying. 41 years in the industry, it's a shame to lose people like that.

My opinion on this is the same. If you want it, then get it. If you don't then don't get it. The responsibility needs to to be on the person and the government doing it for you.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:34 pm
by Armchair expert
stan wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:https://cmnnews.org/story/letter-from-a-doctor-to-a-health-minister-T7iSvHSp3c1aADxdwCvoD?fbclid=IwAR06K7rdruIoNyHbU828yKU_hEi24BPqUeKQ6O7Y0RsfJmdFg58jOzxvJsE
Plenty of people in the same situation. Can't argue with what he is saying. 41 years in the industry, it's a shame to lose people like that.

My opinion on this is the same. If you want it, then get it. If you don't then don't get it. The responsibility needs to to be on the person and the government doing it for you.


I am happy for those who chose not to get it to forfeit medicare if they do get it, personal responsibility.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:42 pm
by daysofourlives
Armchair expert wrote:
stan wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:https://cmnnews.org/story/letter-from-a-doctor-to-a-health-minister-T7iSvHSp3c1aADxdwCvoD?fbclid=IwAR06K7rdruIoNyHbU828yKU_hEi24BPqUeKQ6O7Y0RsfJmdFg58jOzxvJsE
Plenty of people in the same situation. Can't argue with what he is saying. 41 years in the industry, it's a shame to lose people like that.

My opinion on this is the same. If you want it, then get it. If you don't then don't get it. The responsibility needs to to be on the person and the government doing it for you.


I am happy for those who chose not to get it to forfeit medicare if they do get it, personal responsibility.


Lol and the same can be said for smokers and alcoholics, hell why stop there, pregnant women too, thats a choice to get pregnant.
Are we going to make them pay for health care too?
Go get ya booster that didnt work the 1st two times, im sure it will work this time, but hey if that fails theres always the 4th and 5th, im sure youre the type of person that will blindly keep lining up for it

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:57 pm
by The Bedge
We have had a good two years to get our heads around Coronavirus - Google the right, wrong and crazy information. Two years of understanding the implications.

Opportunity for vaccinations, now for boosters. Learning to live with masks and hygiene methods i.e sanitiser.

Those who have been vaccinated good for you.. those who choose not to, who cares, they understand the risks they’re taking.

Time to get on with life IMO… now I hear that SA is allowing vaccination for 5-12 year olds. Huh? The age bracket that supposedly didn’t carry the virus, or were impacted, or show symptoms etc? The age bracket that don’t require masks being worn or follow other conforms the rest of us do. Why now do they need vaccination when they’re for all intents and purposes “immune”?

I believe the risks and concerns with covid and have from the start.. but I also see the other side to the coin and driven by the inconsistencies over 24 months.. and i genuinely feel like as a country we are becoming very “robotic” or conformed. Like 2yrs and we still live like this despite all we know… read social media and the people going into meltdown over covid updates still it’s crazy!

Can’t remember where I was going with this, few beers in.. think in a nutshell life should be normal. Vaccinations should be optional not feel like you’re bullied into it due to risk of losing other benefits. Using your grandma’s health as an argument is becoming old and stale as well - they’re old, they’re not stupid and they can take measures to mitigate risk as well I’m sure.

Apache is right, too many sheep.. baaaa

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 10:07 pm
by Smashed Crab
Vamos wrote:
Jase wrote:So went to a families place for our annual Christmas party with all the kids, 4 families an excellent evening had by all...

Got a message from the hosts this morning advising that their boy had been at OSHC on the Tuesday and one of the workers had covid.

So we are playing the waiting game now to see if anyone gets symptoms...

Merry Christmas everyone...


Largs Bay OSH?


I just flew home from Port Lincoln this arvo. Walk in the door, greet the kids and wife. Wife takes a phone call, its the director at kids childcare centre in Port Adelaide. An educator and a kid from Wednesday have tested positive. FML so now kids are classed as close contacts, we have to get a bazillion tests.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 10:09 pm
by Armchair expert
daysofourlives wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:
stan wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:https://cmnnews.org/story/letter-from-a-doctor-to-a-health-minister-T7iSvHSp3c1aADxdwCvoD?fbclid=IwAR06K7rdruIoNyHbU828yKU_hEi24BPqUeKQ6O7Y0RsfJmdFg58jOzxvJsE
Plenty of people in the same situation. Can't argue with what he is saying. 41 years in the industry, it's a shame to lose people like that.

My opinion on this is the same. If you want it, then get it. If you don't then don't get it. The responsibility needs to to be on the person and the government doing it for you.


I am happy for those who chose not to get it to forfeit medicare if they do get it, personal responsibility.


Lol and the same can be said for smokers and alcoholics, hell why stop there, pregnant women too, thats a choice to get pregnant.
Are we going to make them pay for health care too?
Go get ya booster that didnt work the 1st two times, im sure it will work this time, but hey if that fails theres always the 4th and 5th, im sure youre the type of person that will blindly keep lining up for it


And I got a bite, smokers/drunks pay tax each time they purchase, I think I read that smokers are actually $$ positive to the government.

Kids are future tax payers...

I'll follow actual health advice from experts not dodgy AI written websites



These chicks have HIV, do you **** them without a condom?

Image

Or do you trust your "natural immunity"

LOL