by bennymacca » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:18 pm
by HH3 » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:19 pm
by Booney » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:22 pm
tipper wrote:i need to know, those that are against gay marriage, how do you feel about a tv show that is/has (o idea which, i dont watch it) married couples that have never met each other before, all in the name of ratings and the almighty (dollar)? does that not cheapen the "sanctity" of marriage? any objections to that?
or is it ok to marry for money, but not love?
by whufc » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:23 pm
tipper wrote:i need to know, those that are against gay marriage, how do you feel about a tv show that is/has (o idea which, i dont watch it) married couples that have never met each other before, all in the name of ratings and the almighty (dollar)? does that not cheapen the "sanctity" of marriage? any objections to that?
or is it ok to marry for money, but not love?
by Magellan » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:28 pm
tipper wrote:or is it ok to marry for money, but not love?
by tipper » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:29 pm
whufc wrote:tipper wrote:i need to know, those that are against gay marriage, how do you feel about a tv show that is/has (o idea which, i dont watch it) married couples that have never met each other before, all in the name of ratings and the almighty (dollar)? does that not cheapen the "sanctity" of marriage? any objections to that?
or is it ok to marry for money, but not love?
Im pro gay marriage without question.
I would think though those 'marriages' on tv are not even legal and are just 'set up' for tv.
by bennymacca » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:32 pm
HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
by Magellan » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:35 pm
bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
by Booney » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:36 pm
bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
by Booney » Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:37 pm
Magellan wrote:bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
Every rose has its thorn.
by Magellan » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:25 pm
Booney wrote:Magellan wrote:bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
Every rose has its thorn.
Wendy James, Brett Michaels, got a thing for blondes mate?
by Booney » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:36 pm
Magellan wrote:
by am Bays » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:37 pm
Booney wrote:Magellan wrote:bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
Every rose has its thorn.
Wendy James, Brett Michaels, got a thing for blondes mate?
by Magellan » Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:53 pm
am Bays wrote:Ahh, but do the curtains match the carpet????
by Footy Chick » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:07 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Pseudo » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:08 pm
tipper wrote:i need to know, those that are against gay marriage, how do you feel about a tv show that is/has (o idea which, i dont watch it) married couples that have never met each other before, all in the name of ratings and the almighty (dollar)? does that not cheapen the "sanctity" of marriage? any objections to that?
by Pseudo » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:09 pm
bennymacca wrote:Not to mention so many of the celebrity weddings that last a matter of hours or days.
My opinion is do whatever the hell you want, so long as all parties consent. I cant even really see the problem in polygamy either really. Imagine having 3 wifes all nagging the shit out of you
by Spargo » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:12 pm
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
Yes, without any relevant experience that certainly throws up some logistical challenges, ones I'd be willing to take head on, mind you.
by Booney » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:18 pm
Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:I'd probably put up with the nagging if I could get semi-regular triple headers....
if only it were that simple
Yes, without any relevant experience that certainly throws up some logistical challenges, ones I'd be willing to take head on, mind you.
Pardon the pun...
by bennymacca » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:21 pm
Pseudo wrote:bennymacca wrote:Not to mention so many of the celebrity weddings that last a matter of hours or days.
My opinion is do whatever the hell you want, so long as all parties consent. I cant even really see the problem in polygamy either really. Imagine having 3 wifes all nagging the shit out of you
Pales in comparison to the three mothers in law...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |