Page 452 of 785

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:00 am
by Booney
US numbers :

20.6m cases

299,000 new cases TODAY!

351,000 dead.

US Army deployed to remove the dead from hospitals in California.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:14 am
by Corona Man
Booney wrote:US numbers :

20.6m cases

299,000 new cases TODAY!

351,000 dead.

US Army deployed to remove the dead from hospitals in California.

All those sheep, hey?

Someone should have told them its all a hoax.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 9:46 am
by Q.
cracka wrote:
Q. wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:Right if you would of read Q previous post i was responding to his statement these treatments do not work You DODO i also posted the other point of view from the leftist Guardian ok with you DODO


None of those are studies from peer reviewed medical journals. The HCQ Recovery Study used a gold standard methodology and supersedes any of the work conducted prior including the Lancet study mentioned in the Guardian article.


Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/


Peer review and the publication process with experimental repetition is the only source of substantiated evidence available. It is important to understand it's strengths and weaknesses for assessing validity of papers (ie. predatory pay-for-play journals exist - how do you identify those? how do you identify bogus data and papers?).

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:51 am
by Mic
Booney wrote:US numbers :

20.6m cases

299,000 new cases TODAY!

351,000 dead.

US Army deployed to remove the dead from hospitals in California.


Over .1% (or 1/1000th) of their population has died from Covid. :shock:

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:57 pm
by am Bays
Q. wrote:
Compare this with Canada who has ordered enough of the vaccines that it’s already approved to cover four times its population. Australia’s position is woeful by comparison.


Well given Canada with a population of 37 Million has had over 530 000 reported cases compared to our 29 000 and 14000 deaths compared to our 908 (source WHO epidemiological situation report 29/12/2020) their need is clearly greater than ours - arguably due to their geography.

No I don't take the all the WHO data as gospel but for two advanced Western civilised countries with similar universal health systems (federally funded state/province run) I am confident in theirs and our data being accurate within 95% confidence intervals.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 5:48 pm
by Q.
am Bays wrote:
Q. wrote:
Compare this with Canada who has ordered enough of the vaccines that it’s already approved to cover four times its population. Australia’s position is woeful by comparison.


Well given Canada with a population of 37 Million has had over 530 000 reported cases compared to our 29 000 and 14000 deaths compared to our 908 (source WHO epidemiological situation report 29/12/2020) their need is clearly greater than ours - arguably due to their geography.

No I don't take the all the WHO data as gospel but for two advanced Western civilised countries with similar universal health systems (federally funded state/province run) I am confident in theirs and our data being accurate within 95% confidence intervals.


6 months is a long time in COVID world. And according to timeframes, we'll only have vaccinations for 20% of Australians in the first half of 2021.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 6:52 pm
by daysofourlives
Q. wrote:
am Bays wrote:
Q. wrote:
Compare this with Canada who has ordered enough of the vaccines that it’s already approved to cover four times its population. Australia’s position is woeful by comparison.


Well given Canada with a population of 37 Million has had over 530 000 reported cases compared to our 29 000 and 14000 deaths compared to our 908 (source WHO epidemiological situation report 29/12/2020) their need is clearly greater than ours - arguably due to their geography.

No I don't take the all the WHO data as gospel but for two advanced Western civilised countries with similar universal health systems (federally funded state/province run) I am confident in theirs and our data being accurate within 95% confidence intervals.


6 months is a long time in COVID world. And according to timeframes, we'll only have vaccinations for 20% of Australians in the first half of 2021.


Happy to give up mine for all you blokes who are anxious about it. No need to thank me

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 7:47 pm
by daysofourlives
Corona Man wrote:
Booney wrote:US numbers :

20.6m cases

299,000 new cases TODAY!

351,000 dead.

US Army deployed to remove the dead from hospitals in California.

All those sheep, hey?

Someone should have told them its all a hoax.


https://www.facebook.com/groups/3395791 ... 377551258/

There is a link in this article to notifiable diseases in the UK, government official site.
Just 13781 cases in the UK and Wales for the whole of 2020, ill say it again that is cases, not deaths.
Sure is the greatest hoax ever pulled on mankind.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 8:25 pm
by DOC
Thats cases diagnosed by doctors. The vast majority of cases are diagnosed without doctor intervention (same as here).

The UK currently sits at 2.654.779 cases with 82,624 deaths.

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 8:32 pm
by Q.
daysofourlives wrote:
Corona Man wrote:
Booney wrote:US numbers :

20.6m cases

299,000 new cases TODAY!

351,000 dead.

US Army deployed to remove the dead from hospitals in California.

All those sheep, hey?

Someone should have told them its all a hoax.


https://www.facebook.com/groups/3395791 ... 377551258/

There is a link in this article to notifiable diseases in the UK, government official site.
Just 13781 cases in the UK and Wales for the whole of 2020, ill say it again that is cases, not deaths.
Sure is the greatest hoax ever pulled on mankind.


It's really embarrassing for you that your source of information is a nutcase conspiracy group on Facebook

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 10:09 pm
by stan
Q. wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:
Corona Man wrote:
Booney wrote:US numbers :

20.6m cases

299,000 new cases TODAY!

351,000 dead.

US Army deployed to remove the dead from hospitals in California.

All those sheep, hey?

Someone should have told them its all a hoax.


https://www.facebook.com/groups/3395791 ... 377551258/

There is a link in this article to notifiable diseases in the UK, government official site.
Just 13781 cases in the UK and Wales for the whole of 2020, ill say it again that is cases, not deaths.
Sure is the greatest hoax ever pulled on mankind.


It's really embarrassing for you that your source of information is a nutcase conspiracy group on Facebook
What's the point of that group?

I read through some stuff and it was interesting but even with the first post that Days has referenced there wasn't a source for it.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 8:09 am
by Booney
DOC wrote:Thats cases diagnosed by doctors. The vast majority of cases are diagnosed without doctor intervention (same as here).

The UK currently sits at 2.654.779 cases with 82,624 deaths.

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases


Not only would you have to be a moron to reference a Facebook conspiracy page but you would leap to the front of the line if you didn't actually understand the data you were referencing. :lol:

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:37 pm
by Jimmy_041
Facebook and Twitter: neither are credible sources of information but it doesn’t stop idiots believing what they read if it supports their agenda

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:24 am
by Dutchy
Things going well in the US :shock:


Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:25 am
by mighty_tiger_79
Someone who attended the MCG test has now tested positive

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:41 am
by Jimmy_041
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Someone who attended the MCG test has now tested positive

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk


Big chance of it being an Uber driver with a media degree

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 11:43 am
by Booney
1 in 5 Californians tested in the last 48 hours are COVID positive. 1. In. 5.

Californian Emergency Services personal have been told not to transport older cardiac patients or people with a lower chance of survival as the hospitals are already over loaded with patients.

But it's all fake, so that's good news.

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:21 pm
by am Bays
Booney wrote:1 in 5 Californians tested in the last 48 hours are COVID positive. 1. In. 5.

Californian Emergency Services personal have been told not to transport older cardiac patients or people with a lower chance of survival as the hospitals are already over loaded with patients.

But it's all fake, so that's good news.


From someone who works in Health, our whole National COVID-19 strategy is about avoiding that. Plans have been made but no one wants them to be implemented. Lets stop it from getting that bad.

The alternative double the GST or apply a COVID levy that's double the Medicare one so we can cope with the demand.

What's better? wearing a mask, practicing's good hygiene, contact tracing, a vaccine, and short term lockdowns, or an increase in taxes??

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 1:15 pm
by Q.
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Someone who attended the MCG test has now tested positive

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk


Interestingly, DHHS doesn't believe that they were infectious at the time, but rather that it's possible they acquired the infection while there :shock:

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2021 1:25 pm
by Jim05
Q. wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Someone who attended the MCG test has now tested positive

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk


Interestingly, DHHS doesn't believe that they were infectious at the time, but rather that it's possible they acquired the infection while there :shock:
The thought now seems to be that he may have caught it at Chadstone.
Reckon there was a Boost Juice worker there a couple of days ago that had it and Chaddy is a nightmare at the best of times let alone on Boxing Day with sales