by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:53 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:14 am
by footy1992 » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:47 am
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Plus if was a big enough hit to warrant an 8 game suspension, why didnt any of the umpires report the player? What were they doing?
by shoe boy » Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:59 am
RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
by oxa » Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:15 am
by canyouseewhatisee » Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:25 am
by Dig » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:35 am
by reppoh_eht » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:58 am
by White Line Fever » Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:06 am
reppoh_eht wrote:There are two things that really annoy me about this 8 Match Suspension that was handed out last night...
Firstly how can the SFL just push it forward to the next week after Porties didn't show up on the first week? Did they have a good reason? (Even if they did I think it's unnacceptable) Even though I don't agree with the 8 game sentance if they showed up last week atleast he would have only missed 6 games next season instead of 7... One extra game next year may not sound like much, but it all counts!
Secondly as neither umpire saw the first incident (porties) or the second incident (flaggies) I assume it was simple Porties word against Flaggies word last night. How can they hand out any suspension let alone 8 weeks when there was no evidence, apart from what the Porties supportes say?
If Flaggies put in a club report against Manhood for his first hit (which started everything) would he be looking down the barrel of an 8 week lay off? (Very unlikely)
I've seen incidents of players coming in swining and causing plenty of damage right in front of the umpire, and when they go to the tribunal (with the umpires evidence against them) they very rarely get any more than 1 or 2 weeks...
by Hardly_super » Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:36 am
RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
by shoe boy » Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:41 am
Hardly_super wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
The punisment really should fit the crime? ??
In this case it is hard t tell as limited people were witness to the event. If sounds like the lad on the recieving end is still in some trouble and the fact that the supporter felt it needed to be taken futrther makes it seem like a pretty brutal incident.
The real problem is the SFL have set a precident that is going to cause them some massive headaches in the future. The tribunal has been missed used and an example made that the SFL are going to regret!
RA- did the accused player plead guilty to striking?
by Hardly_super » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:09 pm
shoe boy wrote:Hardly_super wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
The punisment really should fit the crime? ??
In this case it is hard t tell as limited people were witness to the event. If sounds like the lad on the recieving end is still in some trouble and the fact that the supporter felt it needed to be taken futrther makes it seem like a pretty brutal incident.
The real problem is the SFL have set a precident that is going to cause them some massive headaches in the future. The tribunal has been missed used and an example made that the SFL are going to regret!
RA- did the accused player plead guilty to striking?
Not the first time this year Porties have done this!! Make sure your own backyard is in shape b4 you put pen to paper!!!
by reppoh_eht » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:25 pm
Hardly_super wrote:shoe boy wrote:Hardly_super wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
The punisment really should fit the crime? ??
In this case it is hard t tell as limited people were witness to the event. If sounds like the lad on the recieving end is still in some trouble and the fact that the supporter felt it needed to be taken futrther makes it seem like a pretty brutal incident.
The real problem is the SFL have set a precident that is going to cause them some massive headaches in the future. The tribunal has been missed used and an example made that the SFL are going to regret!
RA- did the accused player plead guilty to striking?
Not the first time this year Porties have done this!! Make sure your own backyard is in shape b4 you put pen to paper!!!
Shoe Boy- Do you know how many time people have actually recieved game suspensions from a Club posting a report that an umpire didnt witness? would be interesting to see the figures.
by Lunchbox Legend » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:45 pm
shoe boy wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
Porties getting a bit of a record for this!!! The old saying" people in glass houses"!
Detective ELLIOT involved??? did the same supporters not see ALL THE INCIDENTS or just what THEY wanted to see!!!!!!!!
by shoe boy » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:52 pm
Hardly_super wrote:shoe boy wrote:Hardly_super wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
The punisment really should fit the crime? ??
In this case it is hard t tell as limited people were witness to the event. If sounds like the lad on the recieving end is still in some trouble and the fact that the supporter felt it needed to be taken futrther makes it seem like a pretty brutal incident.
The real problem is the SFL have set a precident that is going to cause them some massive headaches in the future. The tribunal has been missed used and an example made that the SFL are going to regret!
RA- did the accused player plead guilty to striking?
Not the first time this year Porties have done this!! Make sure your own backyard is in shape b4 you put pen to paper!!!
Shoe Boy- Do you know how many time people have actually recieved game suspensions from a Club posting a report that an umpire didnt witness? would be interesting to see the figures.
by MatteeG » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:55 pm
reppoh_eht wrote:How can they hand out any suspension let alone 8 weeks when there was no evidence, apart from what the Porties supportes say?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by shoe boy » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:00 pm
Lunchbox Legend wrote:shoe boy wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
Porties getting a bit of a record for this!!! The old saying" people in glass houses"!
Detective ELLIOT involved??? did the same supporters not see ALL THE INCIDENTS or just what THEY wanted to see!!!!!!!!
SB correct me if I am wrong but wasn't there an incident down there several years ago where one of your players snotted a young emu lad and his brother retaliated by hitting the perpetrator. Your president of the day reported the emu player and he got games.
Also I believe that you still have a big bloke who wears number 32 running around hitting blokes.
The umpires don't manage to see a lot of these incidents so I guess more clubs will make these reports more often.
by The Poacher » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:08 pm
shoe boy wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
Porties getting a bit of a record for this!!! The old saying" people in glass houses"!
Detective ELLIOT involved??? did the same supporters not see ALL THE INCIDENTS or just what THEY wanted to see!!!!!!!!
by The Poacher » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:41 pm
Simple solution to the umpiring problem lets have 36 umpires and 2 players on the field..NAH!!!! that wont work they would still miss everything because they would be to busy watching the footy from their better viewing position. please disregard this postHardly_super wrote:shoe boy wrote:Hardly_super wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
The punisment really should fit the crime? ??
In this case it is hard t tell as limited people were witness to the event. If sounds like the lad on the recieving end is still in some trouble and the fact that the supporter felt it needed to be taken futrther makes it seem like a pretty brutal incident.
The real problem is the SFL have set a precident that is going to cause them some massive headaches in the future. The tribunal has been missed used and an example made that the SFL are going to regret!
RA- did the accused player plead guilty to striking?
Not the first time this year Porties have done this!! Make sure your own backyard is in shape b4 you put pen to paper!!!
Shoe Boy- Do you know how many time people have actually recieved game suspensions from a Club posting a report that an umpire didnt witness? would be interesting to see the figures.
by Cheese Twisties » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:52 pm
shoe boy wrote:Lunchbox Legend wrote:shoe boy wrote:RedArmy wrote:just thought i'd inform everyone about the incident that happened at port noarlunga 2 weeks ago.. Our player has been handed an 8 match ban... the SFL is an absolute joke, how can you give 8 weeks for an unseen incident, where the only witnesses were port noarlunga supporters, and the port noarlunga walked away from the incident with nothing but concussion.. Absolute disgrace, looks like next year every time there is a bit of roughness, all a club has to do is report it and the player will be out for several weeks
Porties getting a bit of a record for this!!! The old saying" people in glass houses"!
Detective ELLIOT involved??? did the same supporters not see ALL THE INCIDENTS or just what THEY wanted to see!!!!!!!!
SB correct me if I am wrong but wasn't there an incident down there several years ago where one of your players snotted a young emu lad and his brother retaliated by hitting the perpetrator. Your president of the day reported the emu player and he got games.
Also I believe that you still have a big bloke who wears number 32 running around hitting blokes.
The umpires don't manage to see a lot of these incidents so I guess more clubs will make these reports more often.
Lunch box I have been around the club for a long time and dont recall the MV incident but could be wrong. This year we played MV and all witnessed an incident that was also captured on film but did you see us running to SFL! Sometimes a quite word between senior footy ops and managment clears issues up.
As for 32 he has NEVER been reported for striking!!! swearing at f----g umps but nothing else! when your that big people run into you.
Football
Other Footy Leagues
SFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

