by Tiger83 » Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:10 am
by White Line Fever » Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:00 am
Tiger83 wrote:having played a bit of footy with the Knights brothers in previous years I would say that Damian is a 'hard at it' player whose disposal skills let him down occasionally and is prone to brain snaps resulting in free kicks and 50m penalties. Cant knock the way he attacks the footy tho. Adam is a typical case of small man syndrome but has good skills overall. Admittedly i havent played with these guys in a few years so things may have changed..
by Muffler » Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:15 pm
RedArmy wrote:Jayne wrote:Spangy wrote:Dutchy wrote:Flaggies is up -> http://www.users.on.net/%7Eflagstaffhil ... rogram.pdf
Looking at the draw for flaggies I would say they will be looking at a top 8 finish & a finals campaign...
Nope, disagree Spangy, if the results go with the 'odds' they win 8 and lose 10 and miss [again]
It is a harder draw this year than last in terms of the teams we play twice, so won't be a guaranteed top 8 finish by no means. But things are looking up for flaggies, 2 more players have put pen to paper over the last couple of weeks. One from goody saints and one from mitcham
by Bomberland » Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:48 pm
White Line Fever wrote:Tiger83 wrote:having played a bit of footy with the Knights brothers in previous years I would say that Damian is a 'hard at it' player whose disposal skills let him down occasionally and is prone to brain snaps resulting in free kicks and 50m penalties. Cant knock the way he attacks the footy tho. Adam is a typical case of small man syndrome but has good skills overall. Admittedly i havent played with these guys in a few years so things may have changed..
Damien - hard at it, skills rarely let him down these days, accurate set shot, pretty handy CHB-great spoiler but also can pinch hit in midfield and can play at full forward. Leadership qualities help.
Adam - As above by T83, fantastic tackler, hard, in and under player and finishes, midfielder/centreman
Both good blokes and would be a good inclusion to any footy club.
by sheepdog » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:28 pm
by White Line Fever » Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:31 pm
sheepdog wrote:maybe you should qualify your statement Bomberland by saying that you are far from being his mate to put it in perspective
by Spangy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:59 am
by asert » Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:39 pm
by Spangy » Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:57 am
asert wrote:I'd say it would be a revenue thing. Games being played at ovals that can't control gate takings would be massive financial loss. If the league said yeah that's fine but let's double every players yearly fees and entry fee to games would you still have that opinion
by reppoh_eht » Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:51 am
Spangy wrote:asert wrote:I'd say it would be a revenue thing. Games being played at ovals that can't control gate takings would be massive financial loss. If the league said yeah that's fine but let's double every players yearly fees and entry fee to games would you still have that opinion
Not sure about that asert.. Finals are at Porties, Shoes, Aldinga,Marion & beachies... These grounds can control the gate takings.. If it was a revenue thing - what about all the other clubs that can control gate takings...
They shouldn't have to up fees or entry fees for finals to be played at the home ground.... What do SAAFL Div 1 do? I think they play finals at home grounds & grand frinal at a neutral..
by Lance's brother » Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:46 pm
Spangy wrote:asert wrote:I'd say it would be a revenue thing. Games being played at ovals that can't control gate takings would be massive financial loss. If the league said yeah that's fine but let's double every players yearly fees and entry fee to games would you still have that opinion
Not sure about that asert.. Finals are at Porties, Shoes, Aldinga,Marion & beachies... These grounds can control the gate takings.. If it was a revenue thing - what about all the other clubs that can control gate takings...
They shouldn't have to up fees or entry fees for finals to be played at the home ground.... What do SAAFL Div 1 do? I think they play finals at home grounds & grand frinal at a neutral..
by Spangy » Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:22 pm
reppoh_eht wrote:Spangy wrote:asert wrote:I'd say it would be a revenue thing. Games being played at ovals that can't control gate takings would be massive financial loss. If the league said yeah that's fine but let's double every players yearly fees and entry fee to games would you still have that opinion
Not sure about that asert.. Finals are at Porties, Shoes, Aldinga,Marion & beachies... These grounds can control the gate takings.. If it was a revenue thing - what about all the other clubs that can control gate takings...
They shouldn't have to up fees or entry fees for finals to be played at the home ground.... What do SAAFL Div 1 do? I think they play finals at home grounds & grand frinal at a neutral..
Think about all 5 Saturday Grades rather than just the A Grade Spangy. If it was H.Valley vs M.Vale and Valleys finished higher, under your system then that game would be played at Valleys.
Then what do you do about the other 4 grades do they too play at the home ground of the higher team? Meaning that there could possibly be 5 finals matches played at 5 different grounds on the same day. This would be a nightmare for clubs to organise support staff, the SFL would need to spread their resources very lightly, and the crowds would suffer big time. Let alone how bad and minimal the atmosphere would be for all involved.
Although i agree that the higher finishing team should be rewarded in some form, this is not the answer. After all we are the SFL, a competition that is based on clubs and familys coming together, rather than the SAAFL model were clubs spend minimal time together on a Saturday.
by qwerty » Thu Dec 16, 2010 8:54 am
by Spangy » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:18 pm
qwerty wrote:Probably because they are the better decks in the league and as previously mentioned can cater for car parking etc....
Seriously, would you rather play/watch a final at Morphett Vale or Noarlunga - One has the best deck in the league, good catering facilities, parking and an oval that is suitable to watching good footy, the other can hold 20 cars an average deck and an oval you can kick past centre on from kick ins!
In saying that i think some other ovals could also be used - in years gone by Reynella was used and I reckon Hackham would be alright also.
by Look Good In Leather » Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:21 pm
qwerty wrote:Probably because they are the better decks in the league and as previously mentioned can cater for car parking etc....
Seriously, would you rather play/watch a final at Morphett Vale or Noarlunga - One has the best deck in the league, good catering facilities, parking and an oval that is suitable to watching good footy, the other can hold 20 cars an average deck and an oval you can kick past centre on from kick ins!
In saying that i think some other ovals could also be used - in years gone by Reynella was used and I reckon Hackham would be alright also.
by Half Back » Thu Dec 16, 2010 6:02 pm
by Mister Footy » Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:49 am
Half Back wrote:any news on what is happening out at valley with dent now coaching. any players moved on as suggested.
any other clubs have anything happening before the christmas break.
by fathersonsfl » Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:05 am
by shoe boy » Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:42 am
fathersonsfl wrote:Is it true that Charlie is coaching The Shoes U16s?
by HappyWanderer » Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:30 pm
Spangy wrote:qwerty wrote:Probably because they are the better decks in the league and as previously mentioned can cater for car parking etc....
Seriously, would you rather play/watch a final at Morphett Vale or Noarlunga - One has the best deck in the league, good catering facilities, parking and an oval that is suitable to watching good footy, the other can hold 20 cars an average deck and an oval you can kick past centre on from kick ins!
In saying that i think some other ovals could also be used - in years gone by Reynella was used and I reckon Hackham would be alright also.
Aldinga's deck is crap! You know a final at M/vale wouldn't be so bad - not saying I would prefer it because it is a crap deck but the atmosphere would be better as it is a smaller ground & people would be crammed in if you not what I mean!... Sometimes playing on a smaller ground suits other teams rather than playing on a bigger ground & in finals its tight & close, the smaller grounds could produce a closer game than you would think... That is 1 of the reasons I think the home team finals should be at the home team ground until the Grand Final... Catering facilities would be an issue at some grounds but I am sure something could be resolved to accomodate the extra influx of crowds... i.e. bring an extra cart/stand in etc...
If they don't change it or give the option - I don't see why they don't use Hackham or even Happy Valley's ground & there is still plenty of other grounds they can use instead of being the same grounds every year..
Football
Other Footy Leagues
SFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

