by Maybe » Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:36 pm
by james07 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:37 pm
Maybe wrote:Assistant Coach had a bit to say that might not have helped Ryan either
by norm11 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:42 pm
Maybe wrote:Assistant Coach had a bit to say that might not have helped Ryan either
by scud » Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:48 pm
OnSong wrote:I would love to read scud's thoughts on this!
Passionate outspoken Bridge man he is.
by OnSong » Mon Sep 05, 2011 12:55 pm
scud wrote:OnSong wrote:I would love to read scud's thoughts on this!
Passionate outspoken Bridge man he is.
think theres enough thoughts going around on here openly and privately, as a passionate person im staying out of it... im close to both parties.. and all i'll say is its very disapointing how its all gone down, not sure how it looks from outside the club only you guys can answer that???
by mighty hounds » Mon Sep 05, 2011 1:08 pm
scud wrote:OnSong wrote:I would love to read scud's thoughts on this!
Passionate outspoken Bridge man he is.
think theres enough thoughts going around on here openly and privately, as a passionate person im staying out of it... im close to both parties.. and all i'll say is its very disapointing how its all gone down, not sure how it looks from outside the club only you guys can answer that???
by scud » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:00 pm
OnSong wrote:scud wrote:OnSong wrote:I would love to read scud's thoughts on this!
Passionate outspoken Bridge man he is.
think theres enough thoughts going around on here openly and privately, as a passionate person im staying out of it... im close to both parties.. and all i'll say is its very disapointing how its all gone down, not sure how it looks from outside the club only you guys can answer that???
That was an anti climax but I understand the situation you are in.
by scud » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:02 pm
by maidenmagpie » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:21 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:44 pm
maidenmagpie wrote:the hamley thing isnt the first time to happen,after round 1 2005 the players and commitee sacked ian stafford and earl took over,as they say rest is history
by maidenmagpie » Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:53 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:maidenmagpie wrote:the hamley thing isnt the first time to happen,after round 1 2005 the players and commitee sacked ian stafford and earl took over,as they say rest is history
![]()
Stafford walked out on Mallala, he was most definately not sacked. Thus the players, nor the committee had absolutely nothing to do with this, it was entirely his own decision, and one that nobody saw coming.
by maidenmagpie » Mon Sep 05, 2011 5:55 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:06 pm
by OnSong » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:24 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Could it be a few fringe A grade players leading the revolt were worried about job security and maybe having to get up a couple hours earlier on a saturday if the club continued to improve?
IMO it doesnt matter how you look at it a committee succumbing to the whims of players is not good for a club. Could go through alot of coaches if every player needed to like the coach.
These players should have just accepted the committees descision to reappoint him if they had the club at heart, IMO it says alot about the character of these guys, they are hardly going to be the type of players that will have success given when the going gets tough they just drop their bottom lip and spit the dummy.
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:41 pm
OnSong wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Could it be a few fringe A grade players leading the revolt were worried about job security and maybe having to get up a couple hours earlier on a saturday if the club continued to improve?
IMO it doesnt matter how you look at it a committee succumbing to the whims of players is not good for a club. Could go through alot of coaches if every player needed to like the coach.
These players should have just accepted the committees descision to reappoint him if they had the club at heart, IMO it says alot about the character of these guys, they are hardly going to be the type of players that will have success given when the going gets tough they just drop their bottom lip and spit the dummy.
Lockwood and Caterall gone. Hardly fringe players. 80 per cent of the senior playing group aren't all fringe players either. Never heard of a petition like this before so they must have felt strongly about it.
by norm11 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:51 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:OnSong wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Could it be a few fringe A grade players leading the revolt were worried about job security and maybe having to get up a couple hours earlier on a saturday if the club continued to improve?
IMO it doesnt matter how you look at it a committee succumbing to the whims of players is not good for a club. Could go through alot of coaches if every player needed to like the coach.
These players should have just accepted the committees descision to reappoint him if they had the club at heart, IMO it says alot about the character of these guys, they are hardly going to be the type of players that will have success given when the going gets tough they just drop their bottom lip and spit the dummy.
Lockwood and Caterall gone. Hardly fringe players. 80 per cent of the senior playing group aren't all fringe players either. Never heard of a petition like this before so they must have felt strongly about it.
Moody wouldn't hang around without these two at the club. Here's a long shot, Moody will play at Virginia in 2012 with ex-team mate Wilkey
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:00 pm
norm11 wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:OnSong wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Could it be a few fringe A grade players leading the revolt were worried about job security and maybe having to get up a couple hours earlier on a saturday if the club continued to improve?
IMO it doesnt matter how you look at it a committee succumbing to the whims of players is not good for a club. Could go through alot of coaches if every player needed to like the coach.
These players should have just accepted the committees descision to reappoint him if they had the club at heart, IMO it says alot about the character of these guys, they are hardly going to be the type of players that will have success given when the going gets tough they just drop their bottom lip and spit the dummy.
Lockwood and Caterall gone. Hardly fringe players. 80 per cent of the senior playing group aren't all fringe players either. Never heard of a petition like this before so they must have felt strongly about it.
Moody wouldn't hang around without these two at the club. Here's a long shot, Moody will play at Virginia in 2012 with ex-team mate Wilkey
Couldn't be any further away from the truth here swamp
by norm11 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:22 pm
by SAM GRIBBLES » Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:46 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:Was just sifting through the votes for medal for this year and a well deserved winner again in Whitty, he just keeps stringing consistent games of footy together and is always in Mallala's top few each week. Dual Mail Medalist, three-time club B&F, 1 x Club Runner up B&F, Premiership Captain, 3 time Premiership player, BOG in a winning GF and an A1 Amatuer flag for ROCS. Fair resume and he's still he's only 27 or 28. Has been a handy aquisition for Mallala..... will be up there again in the clubs B&F one would assume. Would be nice to see Joel Mont win a medal one day, I think he's been runner up twice now, it doesn't seem right that he doesn't have one to his name yet, I'm sure he'll win one or two in the next few years if he can stay fit.
I felt for blokes like Moody and Mills, how they earned just 5 and 4 votes respectively is bewildering.
by mighty hounds » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:40 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |