by Chuck Wepner » Sat May 10, 2014 8:10 pm
by carey » Sat May 10, 2014 9:12 pm
by Coach Bombay » Mon May 12, 2014 9:35 am
by woodublieve12 » Mon May 12, 2014 9:39 am
by Booney » Mon May 12, 2014 10:45 am
by Spargo » Mon May 12, 2014 10:55 am
Booney wrote:Brian Taylors call on Saturday night covered everything but the game of football he was watching.
He is shit. In fact, he sets the bar for shit calling.
by bennymacca » Mon May 12, 2014 1:04 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon May 12, 2014 1:11 pm
bennymacca wrote:so is there a single journo or commentator that is generally accepted to not be horrible?
Denis?
.
by bennymacca » Mon May 12, 2014 1:16 pm
by Rik E Boy » Mon May 12, 2014 1:17 pm
Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:Brian Taylors call on Saturday night covered everything but the game of football he was watching.
He is shit. In fact, he sets the bar for shit calling.
I'll say it again - when he was on Fox he was funny, not over the top and entertaining.
Ever since he got the leading gig at 3AW and moved to Channel 7 he's arrogant, condescending, tries too hard to for a laugh and yes, a shit caller.
by Booney » Mon May 12, 2014 1:19 pm
bennymacca wrote:so is there a single journo or commentator that is generally accepted to not be horrible?
by Failed Creation » Mon May 12, 2014 1:27 pm
by Fricky » Mon May 12, 2014 4:43 pm
bennymacca wrote:so is there a single journo or commentator that is generally accepted to not be horrible?
Denis?
Used to be bruce, he used to be the best by a mile but now it is like he is trying to relive the glory days
Caro, Rucci, Rowey - dont actually mind any of them. Gotta remember they are paid to write or comment on controversial topics and generate discussion, as that is what gets people listening and reading.
5aa is a perfect example of that. You can tell that Rowey is told to try and come up with some left field ideas etc, and always act as a counterpoint to the more rational McDermott. Im sure there are plenty of topics that Rowey is trying to argue that he doesnt even agree with, but the point is to generate a debate and get people to listen and call in etc.
by bennymacca » Mon May 12, 2014 4:59 pm
by Coach Bombay » Mon May 12, 2014 5:10 pm
by carey » Mon May 12, 2014 8:23 pm
by bennymacca » Mon May 12, 2014 9:18 pm
by carey » Mon May 12, 2014 9:37 pm
bennymacca wrote:to be fair to him, port did have a breakout year, and their list is still very young. it would be very easy to assume that wines and wingard have a quieter year, and also forget about the impact that an in form robbie gray could have.
also think i would take mcrae over wines but its close.
but yeah 12th was still way too low. possibly 9th or something before the season started...
they should finish top 4 from here though
by bennymacca » Mon May 12, 2014 10:09 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon May 12, 2014 10:12 pm
carey wrote:bennymacca wrote:to be fair to him, port did have a breakout year, and their list is still very young. it would be very easy to assume that wines and wingard have a quieter year, and also forget about the impact that an in form robbie gray could have.
also think i would take mcrae over wines but its close.
but yeah 12th was still way too low. possibly 9th or something before the season started...
they should finish top 4 from here though
I disagree with most of that but hey it's your opinion we all have one. Except your last statement
And on the Wines v McRae it's a needs basis and we needed a Wines type and his a ripper I'd have him over McRae but as I said I do rate McRae
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |