by Booney » Tue Aug 12, 2014 9:47 am
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:17 am
Booney wrote:A little while back I was sick and tired of this story. Now I'm completely absorbed by the Hird camp and their stance.
To say he signed something under duress and with the offer of inducements suggest, to me, that he happily took a bribe and has then admitted to it.
He was offered this, IMO, be the fall guy now and we'll sign you to two more years.
So the question is, if you didn't want to sign it Jim, why did you? Because the two more years meant it was going to be all about Jim until 2017.
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:32 am
Booney wrote:A little while back I was sick and tired of this story. Now I'm completely absorbed by the Hird camp and their stance.
To say he signed something under duress and with the offer of inducements suggest, to me, that he happily took a bribe and has then admitted to it.
He was offered this, IMO, be the fall guy now and we'll sign you to two more years.
So the question is, if you didn't want to sign it Jim, why did you? Because the two more years meant it was going to be all about Jim until 2017.
by JK » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:16 am
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:22 am
JK wrote:Interesting that Demetriou was due to retire at the end of the 2014 season, yet conveniently brought that date forward
by JK » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:26 am
bennymacca wrote:JK wrote:Interesting that Demetriou was due to retire at the end of the 2014 season, yet conveniently brought that date forward
Have definitely wondered that myself. Was told be better "retire" right now I would have thought
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:58 am
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:19 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jim has also mentioned Gills name in court also....
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:28 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:47 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:03 pm
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:06 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:fascinating getting the live feed via twitter
by tipper » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:05 pm
by tigerpie » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:08 pm
Jim05 wrote:dedja wrote:Now Hird turns on the hand that feeds him.
You would have to think it's only a matter of time before Hird is sacked by Essendon.
Little should do the honourable thing and resign considering his actions, together with the Board, have cost the club millions.
The decision to give Hird a 2 year contract extension and to continue to pay him $1M pa when Essendon were dealt with sanctions last year was the height of stupidity.
Clearly Hird is all about Hird, and will endeavour to take everyone down with him.
I feel for genuine Essendon supporters.
How do you figure that?
Having listened to the majority of todays proceedings it seems he is going to take a few down with him and hopefully expose the AFL as the crooks they are. I sense that he knows he wont be back next year and now he can finally have his say in court he will let rip.
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:18 pm
tigerpie wrote:Jim05 wrote:dedja wrote:Now Hird turns on the hand that feeds him.
You would have to think it's only a matter of time before Hird is sacked by Essendon.
Little should do the honourable thing and resign considering his actions, together with the Board, have cost the club millions.
The decision to give Hird a 2 year contract extension and to continue to pay him $1M pa when Essendon were dealt with sanctions last year was the height of stupidity.
Clearly Hird is all about Hird, and will endeavour to take everyone down with him.
I feel for genuine Essendon supporters.
How do you figure that?
Having listened to the majority of todays proceedings it seems he is going to take a few down with him and hopefully expose the AFL as the crooks they are. I sense that he knows he wont be back next year and now he can finally have his say in court he will let rip.
Jim, the AFL didn't inject the players, the club did under Hirds management.
THE END!
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:51 pm
Jim05 wrote:tigerpie wrote:Jim05 wrote:dedja wrote:Now Hird turns on the hand that feeds him.
You would have to think it's only a matter of time before Hird is sacked by Essendon.
Little should do the honourable thing and resign considering his actions, together with the Board, have cost the club millions.
The decision to give Hird a 2 year contract extension and to continue to pay him $1M pa when Essendon were dealt with sanctions last year was the height of stupidity.
Clearly Hird is all about Hird, and will endeavour to take everyone down with him.
I feel for genuine Essendon supporters.
How do you figure that?
Having listened to the majority of todays proceedings it seems he is going to take a few down with him and hopefully expose the AFL as the crooks they are. I sense that he knows he wont be back next year and now he can finally have his say in court he will let rip.
Jim, the AFL didn't inject the players, the club did under Hirds management.
THE END!
And as ive said a million times, as long as the drugs were not banned I couldnt care if the players received 100 injections per day. As yet there is still no substantial evidence that any illegal drugs were given, my opinion will change if new evidence arises
by bennymacca » Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:57 pm
tipper wrote:loved the halftime supercoach score update
edit: linky: http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/james- ... 7021368805
by JK » Tue Aug 12, 2014 5:10 pm
Jim05 wrote:tigerpie wrote:Jim05 wrote:dedja wrote:Now Hird turns on the hand that feeds him.
You would have to think it's only a matter of time before Hird is sacked by Essendon.
Little should do the honourable thing and resign considering his actions, together with the Board, have cost the club millions.
The decision to give Hird a 2 year contract extension and to continue to pay him $1M pa when Essendon were dealt with sanctions last year was the height of stupidity.
Clearly Hird is all about Hird, and will endeavour to take everyone down with him.
I feel for genuine Essendon supporters.
How do you figure that?
Having listened to the majority of todays proceedings it seems he is going to take a few down with him and hopefully expose the AFL as the crooks they are. I sense that he knows he wont be back next year and now he can finally have his say in court he will let rip.
Jim, the AFL didn't inject the players, the club did under Hirds management.
THE END!
And as ive said a million times, as long as the drugs were not banned I couldnt care if the players received 100 injections per day. As yet there is still no substantial evidence that any illegal drugs were given, my opinion will change if new evidence arises
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Aug 12, 2014 5:12 pm
by JK » Tue Aug 12, 2014 5:30 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:why shouldn't it be innocent till proven guilty
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |