Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Talk on the national game
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
Posts: 28710
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Geelong
Location: The Switch
Contact:

Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Rik E Boy »

The Buddy deal is the biggest gamble I have seen in Football. A nine year, multi- million dollar contract only 12 months after sniffling Kurt Tippett. How many premierships do the Swans need to win with Buddy to earn a pass for this move?

Already they've had their COLA taken away. I reckon they lost a bit of respect as well, not that that would matter internally at the club. However, it appears that Hawthorns "all for one" culture has surpassed the Sydney culture which suddenly appears to be all about the coin. I reckon they've been too smart by half and that their bold move has revealed what a farce COLA is. It was never about cost of living, it was about taking on the NRL.

By preventing Buddy from becoming a giant they've bitten the hand that feeds it and if they can't win a flag in the next two or three seasons this rate up there with the sacking of Norm Smith and the Richmond rotating coaches of the eighties as one of the biggest **** ups in Football of all time.

regards,

REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26495
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by dedja »

Tippett yes, Buddy no.

Buddy has had an awesome year, even by his own lofty standards.

Today he was in the Swans best 3, and that's after massive attention by the Hawks defenders.

He's also a consistent big game player.

Tippett is none of the above and just a very highly paid downhill skier.

Agree on the respect side, I suspect the Swans have lost that moral superiority they had always claimed on that front.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Jim05 »

dedja wrote:Tippett yes, Buddy no.

Buddy has had an awesome year, even by his own lofty standards.

Today he was in the Swans best 3, and that's after massive attention by the Hawks defenders.

He's also a consistent big game player.

Tippett is none of the above and just a very highly paid downhill skier.

Agree on the respect side, I suspect the Swans have lost that moral superiority they had always claimed on that front.

Totally agree,
Buddy had a very good game today.
Tippett on the other hand was as useful as John Butcher, the highlights for me was Lake taking a speccy over Tippett and Cyril making him look stupid on a couple of occassions
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
Posts: 28710
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Geelong
Location: The Switch
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Rik E Boy »

It just seemed and still seems such an " all in" gamble by Sydney. There is no doubt that Franklin is a fine player who has had an excellent year. But if it only gets Sydney to the Granny it will be a lost bet.

regards,

REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
Posts: 28710
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Geelong
Location: The Switch
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Rik E Boy »

Jim05 wrote:
dedja wrote:Tippett yes, Buddy no.

Buddy has had an awesome year, even by his own lofty standards.

Today he was in the Swans best 3, and that's after massive attention by the Hawks defenders.

He's also a consistent big game player.

Tippett is none of the above and just a very highly paid downhill skier.

Agree on the respect side, I suspect the Swans have lost that moral superiority they had always claimed on that front.

Totally agree,
Buddy had a very good game today.
Tippett on the other hand was as useful as John Butcher, the highlights for me was Lake taking a speccy over Tippett and Cyril making him look stupid on a couple of occassions


Tippett nowhere near the Swans worst which sums up the day really.

regards,

REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26495
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by dedja »

Maybe, but today's effort was predicated by many Swans going missing under the massive pressure from the Hawks.

Goodes should do the right thing and retire for a start.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by MW »

Tippett was no orphan today. They said the same thing after 3 rounds this year about Buddy...
I think todays result was purely based on Sydney having a walk over in their prelim and Hawks made to fight theirs to the end. Sydney went in obviously believing the bullsh1t and Hawks would of got a rocket for letting Port get so close at the end.

Remember what happened in 2007 when Port beat Geelong in the 2nd last minor round game, then won by a heap over North in their prelim whereas Geelong won in a nail biter against Collingwood...what happened in that GF?
Dogwatcher
Coach
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
Team: Central District
Team: Collingwood
Team: Elizabeth
Location: The Bronx
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Dogwatcher »

Bloodsmoney.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Booney »

On one side they lost 3 of the first 4, ended up on top of the ladder and pumped a team in the Prelim. Making a Grand final is hard work, very hard work and on the day ( as we saw ) anything can happen.

On the other side there is no chance, none whatsoever that Franklin is playing in 8 years time. The club will miss out on recruiting other potential free agents. They'll lose quality youngsters because of it.

Anyone who thinks their "culture" won't suffer because of it is kidding themselves.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by stan »

Booney wrote:On one side they lost 3 of the first 4, ended up on top of the ladder and pumped a team in the Prelim. Making a Grand final is hard work, very hard work and on the day ( as we saw ) anything can happen.

On the other side there is no chance, none whatsoever that Franklin is playing in 8 years time. The club will miss out on recruiting other potential free agents. They'll lose quality youngsters because of it.

Anyone who thinks their "culture" won't suffer because of it is kidding themselves.

Malcheski could be the first one out as he ua still not signed. But you are right I think they have an issue now going forward and keeping the young stars they have.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Well they made their bed......
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:36 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Sorry Dude »

stan wrote:
Booney wrote:On one side they lost 3 of the first 4, ended up on top of the ladder and pumped a team in the Prelim. Making a Grand final is hard work, very hard work and on the day ( as we saw ) anything can happen.

On the other side there is no chance, none whatsoever that Franklin is playing in 8 years time. The club will miss out on recruiting other potential free agents. They'll lose quality youngsters because of it.

Anyone who thinks their "culture" won't suffer because of it is kidding themselves.

Malcheski could be the first one out as he ua still not signed. But you are right I think they have an issue now going forward and keeping the young stars they have.


But then on the other hand you have Mitchell turning down an offer from Carlton to stay with the Swans. Or is this purely for the fact that he knows there are going to be players leaving/ pushed this off season?
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:52 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by bennymacca »

if they win a single premiership in the next 8 years, would that be worth it? probably.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by stan »

Sorry Dude wrote:
stan wrote:
Booney wrote:On one side they lost 3 of the first 4, ended up on top of the ladder and pumped a team in the Prelim. Making a Grand final is hard work, very hard work and on the day ( as we saw ) anything can happen.

On the other side there is no chance, none whatsoever that Franklin is playing in 8 years time. The club will miss out on recruiting other potential free agents. They'll lose quality youngsters because of it.

Anyone who thinks their "culture" won't suffer because of it is kidding themselves.

Malcheski could be the first one out as he ua still not signed. But you are right I think they have an issue now going forward and keeping the young stars they have.


But then on the other hand you have Mitchell turning down an offer from Carlton to stay with the Swans. Or is this purely for the fact that he knows there are going to be players leaving/ pushed this off season?

Or may be he just doesn't want to go to Carlton...
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
Armytank
Under 18s
Posts: 732
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:01 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Sydney Swans
Team: Ironbank
Location: Thunder Park
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Armytank »

we had one good week in 4 and people are surprised we got pantsed in gthe GF?

We got beaten by Richmonf FFS, scraped over the line in a crappy game against Freo, had a week off then pumped the Kangaroos.

The two of them together have shown they are unstoppable when on, but we only really had 3 or 4 that could say they gave a decent performance Saturday.

It is not doom and gloom just yet.
I hate Full Back.....................
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:36 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Sorry Dude »

stan wrote:
Sorry Dude wrote:
stan wrote:
Booney wrote:On one side they lost 3 of the first 4, ended up on top of the ladder and pumped a team in the Prelim. Making a Grand final is hard work, very hard work and on the day ( as we saw ) anything can happen.

On the other side there is no chance, none whatsoever that Franklin is playing in 8 years time. The club will miss out on recruiting other potential free agents. They'll lose quality youngsters because of it.

Anyone who thinks their "culture" won't suffer because of it is kidding themselves.

Malcheski could be the first one out as he ua still not signed. But you are right I think they have an issue now going forward and keeping the young stars they have.


But then on the other hand you have Mitchell turning down an offer from Carlton to stay with the Swans. Or is this purely for the fact that he knows there are going to be players leaving/ pushed this off season?

Or may be he just doesn't want to go to Carlton...


I was more talking from the swans culture suffering Stan. Not the fact he does/ doesn't want to go to Carlton.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:29 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by Grahaml »

They were hardly the reason the Swans lost. If anything having two such powerful forwards gave the Swans hope longer than most other sides. They got hammered in the midfield and that was the game right there. Perhaps you can argue that the money spent on one would have been better invested in a strong midfielder but I don't think there was anyone saying the Swans had a weakness there leading into the game. Sometimes you just have a bad game and sometimes that game just happens to be a grand final.

Now, whether in 7 years time Franklin is a distant memory and they have to pay him a massive chunk of the cap is the long term subplot. But who knows? I remember the same thing being said about Lynch when he signed with Brisbane. In the end he not only saw out the contract but the last 3 years of that deal brought flags.
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:05 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by daysofourlives »

Sydney's defence is their problem going forward and they will be hamstrung by the Buddy/Tippet deals in trying to address that. Obviously they will struggle to maintain some of their young midfield talent going forward too. IMO they now have probably no more than a 2yr window to win a flag.
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by JK »

Grahaml wrote:They were hardly the reason the Swans lost. If anything having two such powerful forwards gave the Swans hope longer than most other sides. They got hammered in the midfield and that was the game right there. Perhaps you can argue that the money spent on one would have been better invested in a strong midfielder but I don't think there was anyone saying the Swans had a weakness there leading into the game. Sometimes you just have a bad game and sometimes that game just happens to be a grand final.

Now, whether in 7 years time Franklin is a distant memory and they have to pay him a massive chunk of the cap is the long term subplot. But who knows? I remember the same thing being said about Lynch when he signed with Brisbane. In the end he not only saw out the contract but the last 3 years of that deal brought flags.


Good post. Pre-game most people thought if anything the Swans might have had a slight midfield edge with players like JPK, Hannebery, Jack, McVeigh, Parker, McGlynn etc running through there, but they were just swamped by a rampant Hawks
FUSC
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
Posts: 9859
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:27 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Contact:

Re: Tippett + Buddy = No flag

Post by gadj1976 »

bennymacca wrote:if they win a single premiership in the next 8 years, would that be worth it? probably.


I'd be happy if my mob won 1 in 8 years. It won't happen of course but to see 1 in the next 8, I'd say any gamble that big would be worth it.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests