by Aerie » Sat Dec 19, 2015 7:24 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Sat Dec 19, 2015 8:34 pm
by Magellan » Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:24 pm
by Pseudo » Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:43 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:Harden up some of you. I expect none of you will attend another SANFL game the way some carry on.
Credit to Sturt for trying to make things work. Obviously said , well no Crows fans rock up at Unley so why not try and make some money by exploring a collaborative agreement. Hats off to clubs that actually THINK .
by on the rails » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:08 am
VALE PARK wrote:Someone just pointed out to me,
North's and Power's last match would round 21 on 21st of August if they don't make the finals.
If North or Power finish top they will have 3 weeks twiddling their thumbs waiting for their first final!
Amazing programming indeed.
by Wedgie » Sun Dec 20, 2015 6:39 am
on the rails wrote:VALE PARK wrote:Someone just pointed out to me,
North's and Power's last match would round 21 on 21st of August if they don't make the finals.
If North or Power finish top they will have 3 weeks twiddling their thumbs waiting for their first final!
Amazing programming indeed.
The only thing correct in the draw is scheduling North for a last round bye - some assumptions are no brainers given we only just won ONE game this year!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by daysofourlives » Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:01 am
Wedgie wrote:on the rails wrote:VALE PARK wrote:Someone just pointed out to me,
North's and Power's last match would round 21 on 21st of August if they don't make the finals.
If North or Power finish top they will have 3 weeks twiddling their thumbs waiting for their first final!
Amazing programming indeed.
The only thing correct in the draw is scheduling North for a last round bye - some assumptions are no brainers given we only just won ONE game this year!
Why give any club the bye in the last round when there's an even amount of teams?
Absolutely dumb!
by on the rails » Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:17 am
by daysofourlives » Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:32 am
by vics01 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 10:02 am
by mal » Sun Dec 20, 2015 10:18 am
by Jim05 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 10:35 am
mal wrote:I wonder how the AFL clubs Adelaide Crows and Port Adelaide feel about the SANFL byes ?
About their 2 reserves teams in the SANFL
At times :
Will it be suitable to have byes to freshen players ?
Or
Will it be unsuitable to have byes as players may need match conditioning ?
Overall will it help or hinder their A grade teams ?
by Reddeer » Sun Dec 20, 2015 11:59 am
on the rails wrote:I agree Wedgie - no byes was one of the selling point "lies" of AFL Reserves inclusion.
Apparently a number of clubs are very angry about the draw. Time they grow balls and take back control and let the 8 traditional clubs run the comp. Simple really!
by Pseudo » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:09 pm
Reddeer wrote:on the rails wrote:I agree Wedgie - no byes was one of the selling point "lites" of AFL Reserves inclusion.
Apparently a number of clubs are very angry about the draw. Time they grow balls and take back control and let the 8 traditional clubs run the comp. Simple really!
Bloody oath!!!
by scott » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:16 pm
by Pseudo » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:26 pm
scott wrote:How good is the VFL television coverage?!!!!!!
They've published the first 15 rounds - one game every week (note: not round, but week) PLUS a second game each round for four weeks (that's 18 matches in 15 rounds and assuming that trend of one match a week will continue all season, that's 24 games across 18 rounds).
Compare that to our deal for the last two seasons where we can't even get one game some weeks. AND definitely not a second.
by Magellan » Sun Dec 20, 2015 1:01 pm
mal wrote:I wonder how the AFL clubs Adelaide Crows and Port Adelaide feel about the SANFL byes ?
About their 2 reserves teams in the SANFL
At times :
Will it be suitable to have byes to freshen players ?
Or
Will it be unsuitable to have byes as players may need match conditioning ?
Overall will it help or hinder their A grade teams ?
by Hazydog » Sun Dec 20, 2015 1:49 pm
on the rails wrote:I agree Wedgie - no byes was one of the selling point "lies" of AFL Reserves inclusion.
Apparently a number of clubs are very angry about the draw. Time they grow balls and take back control and let the 8 traditional clubs run the comp. Simple really!
by southee » Sun Dec 20, 2015 2:35 pm
DOC wrote:For sale: Four light towers, suitable for football, one owner, cost a gazillion but will take best offer.
Do we get a refund on our " I saw the light" tee shirt?
by Bluedemon » Sun Dec 20, 2015 4:23 pm
daysofourlives wrote:RB wrote:Crows v Sturt at Thebby? I thought they weren't having home games?
Could we conclude Sturt lose money on a Crows game and didnt want it with their additional costs for fencing etc?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |