LPH wrote:Would love to see the 'Crow on a Stick' - might be a bit easier than a 'Cow'
Also a bunch of blokes brandishing beef shaslicks might not get the point across.
by Magellan » Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:32 am
LPH wrote:Would love to see the 'Crow on a Stick' - might be a bit easier than a 'Cow'
by Wedgie » Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:49 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by tipper » Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:40 am
therisingblues wrote:whufc wrote:Crows by 72 points
Barmby and Holman to get reported
What the lowest ever crowd to a SANFL final
With two of the northern suburbs biggest amateur clubs in grand finals on Saturday plus a small Crows crowd could be embarrassing
I actually think Crows will turn out in force. This'd hold the novelty value of a slow-down potentially. I really hope regular SANFL fans get down there and back the Doggies in.
by DOC » Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:46 pm
by MW » Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:51 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:52 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by UK Fan » Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:44 pm
DOC wrote:Any chance Centurion and Eric make a showing?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by therisingblues » Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:39 pm
MW wrote:Some of you have some incredible reasons for hypotheticals...how 'bout waiting till after the game beforecomplaining about crowds, players, crows supporters etc
by VALE PARK » Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:59 pm
by jo172 » Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:11 pm
Crows had to get SANFL permission to rest Rory Sloane and Brodie Smith this weekend
Michelangelo Rucci, The Advertiser
18 minutes ago
Subscriber only
CENTRAL District’s outrage at the AFL-based Crows gaining special permits for Cam Ellis-Yolmen and Paul Seedsman to play in Saturday’s SANFL elimination final has a bizarre postscript.
Adelaide also had to seek SANFL permission to NOT play new All-Australian midfielder Rory Sloane and Crows halfback Brodie Smith against the Bulldogs.
Under SANFL rules, the Crows were compelled to play both Smith and Sloane — who both missed Adelaide’s last AFL home-and-away game against West Coast due to, respectively, injury and suspension — in this week’s State league finals.
This clause was written in the AFL-SANFL interchange agreement — with the introduction of AFL reserves teams in the State league in 2014 — to avert the Crows and Power stripping their SANFL sides of talent during finals.
by Venga Bus » Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:17 pm
by Pag » Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:18 pm
by heater31 » Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Pag wrote:Stupid scheduling by the SANFL (Channle 7) in the first place. Got ammo and country finals/GFs being played all over the place, why not just play them on the Sunday like usual with no clashes with other footy?
We'd love to spend our club's Silly Sunday on the hill watching a couple of mates play for the Dogs, as I'm sure some other clubs across the city would have. Instead, we'll be at the pub.
by human_torpedo » Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:43 pm
by MW » Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:07 pm
jo172 wrote:Crows had to get SANFL permission to rest Rory Sloane and Brodie Smith this weekend
Michelangelo Rucci, The Advertiser
18 minutes ago
Subscriber only
CENTRAL District’s outrage at the AFL-based Crows gaining special permits for Cam Ellis-Yolmen and Paul Seedsman to play in Saturday’s SANFL elimination final has a bizarre postscript.
Adelaide also had to seek SANFL permission to NOT play new All-Australian midfielder Rory Sloane and Crows halfback Brodie Smith against the Bulldogs.
Under SANFL rules, the Crows were compelled to play both Smith and Sloane — who both missed Adelaide’s last AFL home-and-away game against West Coast due to, respectively, injury and suspension — in this week’s State league finals.
This clause was written in the AFL-SANFL interchange agreement — with the introduction of AFL reserves teams in the State league in 2014 — to avert the Crows and Power stripping their SANFL sides of talent during finals.
by therisingblues » Fri Sep 02, 2016 6:15 pm
MW wrote:jo172 wrote:Crows had to get SANFL permission to rest Rory Sloane and Brodie Smith this weekend
Michelangelo Rucci, The Advertiser
18 minutes ago
Subscriber only
CENTRAL District’s outrage at the AFL-based Crows gaining special permits for Cam Ellis-Yolmen and Paul Seedsman to play in Saturday’s SANFL elimination final has a bizarre postscript.
Adelaide also had to seek SANFL permission to NOT play new All-Australian midfielder Rory Sloane and Crows halfback Brodie Smith against the Bulldogs.
Under SANFL rules, the Crows were compelled to play both Smith and Sloane — who both missed Adelaide’s last AFL home-and-away game against West Coast due to, respectively, injury and suspension — in this week’s State league finals.
This clause was written in the AFL-SANFL interchange agreement — with the introduction of AFL reserves teams in the State league in 2014 — to avert the Crows and Power stripping their SANFL sides of talent during finals.
This got glossed over too quickly...thoughts?
by whufc » Fri Sep 02, 2016 6:32 pm
MW wrote:jo172 wrote:Crows had to get SANFL permission to rest Rory Sloane and Brodie Smith this weekend
Michelangelo Rucci, The Advertiser
18 minutes ago
Subscriber only
CENTRAL District’s outrage at the AFL-based Crows gaining special permits for Cam Ellis-Yolmen and Paul Seedsman to play in Saturday’s SANFL elimination final has a bizarre postscript.
Adelaide also had to seek SANFL permission to NOT play new All-Australian midfielder Rory Sloane and Crows halfback Brodie Smith against the Bulldogs.
Under SANFL rules, the Crows were compelled to play both Smith and Sloane — who both missed Adelaide’s last AFL home-and-away game against West Coast due to, respectively, injury and suspension — in this week’s State league finals.
This clause was written in the AFL-SANFL interchange agreement — with the introduction of AFL reserves teams in the State league in 2014 — to avert the Crows and Power stripping their SANFL sides of talent during finals.
This got glossed over too quickly...thoughts?
by MW » Fri Sep 02, 2016 6:58 pm
by whufc » Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:03 pm
MW wrote:I think the Crows did bend the rules and kept them out of the side so they had a better chance of beating North Melbourne the following week. The rule is in place to stop AFL listed clubs resting their players during the SANFL finals.
Just thought it was slightly hypocritical to focus on Seed and CEY and not this issue that's all.
by Pseudo » Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:56 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |