by Wasim1 » Tue May 16, 2017 2:08 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue May 16, 2017 2:19 pm
Wasim1 wrote:Hearing that Modbury may have some questions to answer regarding verbalising a female goal umpire by a group of their supporters.
Bet that drained the colour out of Jamie's face when he heard about that!!!!
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Sass! » Tue May 16, 2017 2:25 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Wasim1 wrote:Hearing that Modbury may have some questions to answer regarding verbalising a female goal umpire by a group of their supporters.
Bet that drained the colour out of Jamie's face when he heard about that!!!!
I thnk this might've been some time ago and was dealt with - unless there's been another occurance, which I'd find surprising as Jamie would be right on that stuff.
by Bulls forever » Tue May 16, 2017 6:43 pm
Sass! wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Wasim1 wrote:Hearing that Modbury may have some questions to answer regarding verbalising a female goal umpire by a group of their supporters.
Bet that drained the colour out of Jamie's face when he heard about that!!!!
I thnk this might've been some time ago and was dealt with - unless there's been another occurance, which I'd find surprising as Jamie would be right on that stuff.
Know the incident you are referring too, happened Saturday during the B's.. i saw it happen and can confirm that the comments werent directed at the goal umpire but the field umpire. Either way they were completely out of line and within about 2 minutes a match day official and our Sporting Club President had may there way over the person and addressed the matter with them.
No idea what the outcome will be but i can atleast confirm that our club acted very quickly to address the incident.. but can also confirm the abuse wasnt directed at the female goal umpire.
by thegrowler » Tue May 16, 2017 7:06 pm
Sass! wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Wasim1 wrote:Hearing that Modbury may have some questions to answer regarding verbalising a female goal umpire by a group of their supporters.
Bet that drained the colour out of Jamie's face when he heard about that!!!!
I thnk this might've been some time ago and was dealt with - unless there's been another occurance, which I'd find surprising as Jamie would be right on that stuff.
Know the incident you are referring too, happened Saturday during the B's.. i saw it happen and can confirm that the comments werent directed at the goal umpire but the field umpire. Either way they were completely out of line and within about 2 minutes a match day official and our Sporting Club President had may there way over the person and addressed the matter with them.
No idea what the outcome will be but i can atleast confirm that our club acted very quickly to address the incident.. but can also confirm the abuse wasnt directed at the female goal umpire.
by jo172 » Wed May 17, 2017 9:38 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 17, 2017 9:39 am
thegrowler wrote:Who's Jamie?
What difference does it make if it's a female or male umpire?
by retired60 » Fri May 19, 2017 4:48 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Fri May 19, 2017 4:59 pm
retired60 wrote:I hear Head Office has 'threatened' Modbury with forfeiting the right to play the next 3 home games at Modbury reserve, reinstating a suspended fine from last year, adding additional fine for this year and forfeiting the right to host home finals
by The Bedge » Fri May 19, 2017 5:07 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:retired60 wrote:I hear Head Office has 'threatened' Modbury with forfeiting the right to play the next 3 home games at Modbury reserve, reinstating a suspended fine from last year, adding additional fine for this year and forfeiting the right to host home finals
So, are you saying they have been fined as a result of the incident with the female goal umpire and they are on probation and will lose home games and possibly home finals if they offend again?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by retired60 » Fri May 19, 2017 5:08 pm
by The Bedge » Fri May 19, 2017 5:11 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by retired60 » Fri May 19, 2017 5:12 pm
by VALE PARK » Fri May 19, 2017 6:09 pm
by jo172 » Fri May 19, 2017 6:52 pm
VALE PARK wrote:I didn't think there were any reports last week
as it is Friday with nothing updated on the tribunal website for last week's games.
by Footy Chick » Fri May 19, 2017 7:20 pm
VALE PARK wrote:I didn't think there were any reports last week
as it is Friday with nothing updated on the tribunal website for last week's games.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by jo172 » Fri May 19, 2017 7:56 pm
Footy Chick wrote:VALE PARK wrote:I didn't think there were any reports last week
as it is Friday with nothing updated on the tribunal website for last week's games.
These were published in "the Update"
Westies kid got 10 games for snotting one of our players in the 18's
I only get the update on my work email so can't copy and paste, sorry.
by Footy Chick » Fri May 19, 2017 8:38 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sat May 20, 2017 5:52 pm
by Sass! » Mon May 22, 2017 10:32 am
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Saints by 2pts over TTG in a very hard fought contest. Goodwood 15.5 TTG 13.15. Unfortunately the game was spoilt by a number of bewildering umpiring decisions.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |