by Q. » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:09 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:14 pm
Q. wrote:HH3 wrote:Q. wrote:HH3 wrote:What do you think of the ruling, and the subsequent appeal @Q.?
About right from the start, very similar to Toby Greene punching Daniel in the chops. Houli was always going to have the games downgraded due to clean record.
You don't think the fact Lamb was knocked unconscious should have added games?
Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.
by Q. » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:16 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.
I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court
by HH3 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:17 pm
Q. wrote:Oh, i thought you were asking my opinion, rather than recite the rules of the MRP
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:18 pm
Q. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.
I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court
People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?
by Q. » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:20 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.
I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court
People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?
It does if he has 12 facial fractures compared to none
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:29 pm
Q. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:
It does if he has 12 facial fractures compared to none
He should've drunk more milk
by JK » Wed Jun 28, 2017 2:31 pm
Q. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:Nah, I've never believed that whether are bloke is injured or not should weigh in on a tribunal decision.
I appreciate that's your view but I disagree. The impact is part of the process as it is in a Court
People are physiologically different though. The same whack on a different player and he gets up and plays on...does that make it any less of an offence?
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:18 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:It was graded Intentional/High/High Impact, so the High Impact covers the fact that he was knocked out. Tribunal chairman, Ross Howie pointed out that all there has to be is an intention to strike Lamb, regardless of where the blow might land or whether there was an intention to hurt. I believe he wil end up with 4 down to 3...which is about right in my eyes
by The Bedge » Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:31 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:43 pm
Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8
Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.
by The Bedge » Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:45 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8
Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.
No
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by HH3 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:01 pm
Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8
Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.
No
Ok
by MW » Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:02 pm
Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:If that be the case, he'd be out for 8 - 10 with us even with a clean record
From what I saw, and our manual, I'm still sitting with 6 - 8
Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.
No
Ok
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:18 pm
HH3 wrote:Zartan wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Zartan wrote:Stop comparing professional football with amateur sport.
No
Ok
Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.
by HH3 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 4:19 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:HH3 wrote:Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.
No you wouldn't
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:01 pm
HH3 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:HH3 wrote:Imagine if this was how everyone argued on here....I'd still be on less than 200 posts.
No you wouldn't
Ok
by daysofourlives » Thu Jun 29, 2017 10:50 am
by The Bedge » Thu Jun 29, 2017 10:52 am
daysofourlives wrote:Does anyone think he will get anything other than 3 tonight?? Will appease everyone I would think. I think he should get 6 down to 5 for good record but there's no chance of that happening
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by HH3 » Thu Jun 29, 2017 10:58 am
Zartan wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Does anyone think he will get anything other than 3 tonight?? Will appease everyone I would think. I think he should get 6 down to 5 for good record but there's no chance of that happening
When a player appeals and loses, they run the risk of an increased penalty.. does that mean if the AFL appeals and loses, they run the risk of the player getting less games?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |