Port Adelaide 2017

[MW]

Might be wary of the 2nd year blues...which would diminish his value.

[amber_fluid]

Might be wary of the 2nd year blues...which would diminish his value.

If I was him I'd take that chance.
Port must have made a very good offer to lock him away.

[carey]

Might be wary of the 2nd year blues...which would diminish his value.

If I was him I'd take that chance.
Port must have made a very good offer to lock him away.

Wouldn't you?

[amber_fluid]

Might be wary of the 2nd year blues...which would diminish his value.

If I was him I'd take that chance.
Port must have made a very good offer to lock him away.

Wouldn't you?

Yeah Port have done well getting him to recommit so quickly.

But if I was Power-pepper I would have waited to keep his options open, even if he was happy at Port at present.

[bennymacca]

Might be wary of the 2nd year blues...which would diminish his value.

If I was him I'd take that chance.
Port must have made a very good offer to lock him away.

Wouldn't you?

Yeah Port have done well getting him to recommit so quickly.

But if I was Power-pepper I would have waited to keep his options open, even if he was happy at Port at present.

you dont reckon he would have significant trigger clauses in there? i.e if he finishes top 10 B&F or something...

[carey]

Every single contract in the AFL would!

Zac Dawson would have triggers. They wouldn't be very high!

[nuggety goodness]

What if he just wants to play footy and has a streak of... dare i say it... loyalty... in him. imagine if a player didn't play that merry-go-round, it would be quite refreshing wouldn't it.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[Lightning McQueen]

Every single contract in the AFL would!

Zac Dawson would have triggers. They wouldn't be very high!

He averaged 12.4 disposals per game in 2009, stellar year where he almost single-handedly won the GF off of his own back with 15 disposals and 23rd best for the day.

[morell]

Every single contract in the AFL would!

Zac Dawson would have triggers. They wouldn't be very high!

Nothing wrong with dour but unco defenders carey

[Booney]

Every single contract in the AFL would!

Zac Dawson would have triggers. They wouldn't be very high!

Nothing wrong with dour but unco defenders carey

Carey isn't dour or a defender, what's the point?

[morell]

No, but I am!

[amber_fluid]

Since it's so quiet in here I'll post this pic.
I found it funny anyway!

IMG_1518.JPG (158.59 KiB) Viewed 558 times

[mots02]

test

[MW]

test

failed

[Brodlach]

Sandilands done a hammy in the first quarter

[Wedgie]

Sandilands done a hammy in the first quarter

And that impacts on Port how?

[Brodlach]

Sandilands done a hammy in the first quarter

And that impacts on Port how?

Oops

[mots02]

Sandilands done a hammy in the first quarter

And that impacts on Port how?

Oops

So few people on here discussing Port that people have resorted to giving us injury updates from other clubs!

[Ruben Carter]

Sandilands done a hammy in the first quarter

And that impacts on Port how?

Oops

So few people on here discussing Port that people have resorted to giving us injury updates from other clubs!

Not an awful lot happening on the Cows forum either....

[morell]

Exactly. You shouldn't get me started!!

Hinkley's resistance to pick a side with a reasonable tall forward structure is a major bone of contention for mine. Drives me mental seeing Jarman Impey and previously Jake Neade play as a forward target.

Then we have Westhoff (who is another very good mark) playing on the ******* wing! Then one of our better key defenders and relief ruckman in Trengove is pretending to be a forward! Meanwhile Jonas, Clurey and Hombsch are undersized.

Hinkley is trying to follow the Beveridge model of "22 soldiers" and pays no consideration to structure. It's all over the shop.