Dutchy wrote:8 losses by more than 25 points and all wins under 24 points.
Those losses would have been pretty close for most part
by Turbo » Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:52 pm
Dutchy wrote:8 losses by more than 25 points and all wins under 24 points.
by Booney » Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:53 pm
Turbo wrote:Dutchy wrote:8 losses by more than 25 points and all wins under 24 points.
Those losses would have been pretty close for most part
by bertiebeatle » Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:56 pm
bennymacca wrote:bertiebeatle wrote:amber_fluid wrote:bennymacca wrote:All about ratings. Carlton would rate better than port, even though as a neutral we would all rather see the best teams playing in a Friday night
Good to see someone add some intelligence to the debate.
The world doesn’t revolve around the Power or Crows!
Used Port as an example as i know our fixture more in depth than others, wouldn't matter if it was Port or not.
West Coast is a better example. Was knocked out in the semi finals and only get 1 Thursday night and 1 Friday night game.
Games in the West are always harder because they have to start at funky times
by Turbo » Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:57 pm
amber_fluid wrote:bennymacca wrote:All about ratings. Carlton would rate better than port, even though as a neutral we would all rather see the best teams playing in a Friday night
Good to see someone add some intelligence to the debate.
The world doesn’t revolve around the Power or Crows!
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:01 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:amber_fluid wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:FNF has people tuned in regardless, it's just a matter of how long they stay tuned in before they check on the NRL score or what the Mrs is up to. .
Absolutely 100% correct.
Who checks on their Missus when the footys on?
Permission to land > Carlton.
regards
REB
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:05 pm
The Bedge wrote:bennymacca wrote:The Bedge wrote:Booney wrote:FNF has people tuned in regardless, it's just a matter of how long they stay tuned in before they check on the NRL score or what the Mrs is up to. .
Absolutely 100% correct.
Got some ratings figures to back that up?
Here's a chartgraph FNF.PNG
by Booney » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:17 pm
amber_fluid wrote:
I tried to find a graph for Ports Friday night games but apparently there is insufficient data to produce one.
Maybe I should have googled shithouse time slots?
by bertiebeatle » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:18 pm
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:25 pm
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:29 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:
I tried to find a graph for Ports Friday night games but apparently there is insufficient data to produce one.
Maybe I should have googled shithouse time slots?
I Googled "shithouse teams"
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:35 pm
amber_fluid wrote:
Bahahaha someone isn’t happy with their draw!
We know where we’re at.
Not getting ahead of ourselves like some.............
by Booney » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:37 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Bahahaha someone isn’t happy with their draw!
We know where we’re at.
Not getting ahead of ourselves like some.............
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:39 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:amber_fluid wrote:
Bahahaha someone isn’t happy with their draw!
We know where we’re at.
Not getting ahead of ourselves like some.............
Set your goals low, they're easier to achieve.
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:40 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Bahahaha someone isn’t happy with their draw!
We know where we’re at.
Not getting ahead of ourselves like some.............
You think I posted that because I'm not happy with our draw?
by Turbo » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:42 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:
I tried to find a graph for Ports Friday night games but apparently there is insufficient data to produce one.
Maybe I should have googled shithouse time slots?
I Googled "shithouse teams"
Bahahaha someone isn’t happy with their draw!
We know where we’re at.
Not getting ahead of ourselves like some.............
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:44 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Cheers for the advice
by Booney » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:52 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Bahahaha someone isn’t happy with their draw!
We know where we’re at.
Not getting ahead of ourselves like some.............
You think I posted that because I'm not happy with our draw?
Well it is kinda, sorta, maybe what we’re talking about isn’t it?
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:56 pm
by Booney » Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:57 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Shit you say?
Beaten Port many times over the years.
I’ll say this slowly for you...... You do realise it’s about TV ratings and not the scoreboard don’t you?
by amber_fluid » Wed Nov 01, 2017 3:02 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Shit you say?
Beaten Port many times over the years.
I’ll say this slowly for you...... You do realise it’s about TV ratings and not the scoreboard don’t you?
The prosecution rests.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |