Brodlach wrote:Lycett to become number 1 ruckman to allow Ryder to play full forward and Dixon CHF
Kenny will probably still make them play that run up and down the ground plan.
When the ball goes backwards, sideways, sideways, backwards, forward 15 metres, back 25 metres, sideways again before going forward it doesn’t matter how good your forwards are.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
amber_fluid wrote: When the ball goes backwards, sideways, sideways, backwards, forward 15 metres, back 25 metres, sideways again before going forward it doesn’t matter how good your forwards are.
They do that because there is no one ahead of them when they get the ball. Could have a well structured forward line and go back to basics.
amber_fluid wrote: When the ball goes backwards, sideways, sideways, backwards, forward 15 metres, back 25 metres, sideways again before going forward it doesn’t matter how good your forwards are.
They do that because there is no one ahead of them when they get the ball. Could have a well structured forward line and go back to basics.
I agree. Keep your forwards at home and your a chance to score.
Not with Hinkley in charge you won’t though.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Brodlach wrote:Lycett to become number 1 ruckman to allow Ryder to play full forward and Dixon CHF
Kenny will probably still make them play that run up and down the ground plan.
When the ball goes backwards, sideways, sideways, backwards, forward 15 metres, back 25 metres, sideways again before going forward it doesn’t matter how good your forwards are.
Agreed amber.
The forwards have already led 4 or 5 times so by the time it comes down the ground and into the fifty, the forwards are knackered and can't chase if they don't clunk it.
Brodlach wrote:Lycett to become number 1 ruckman to allow Ryder to play full forward and Dixon CHF
Kenny will probably still make them play that run up and down the ground plan.
When the ball goes backwards, sideways, sideways, backwards, forward 15 metres, back 25 metres, sideways again before going forward it doesn’t matter how good your forwards are.
Jim05 wrote:Unbelievable that the Suns have salary cap issues with the worst list in the comp
How is this possible considering they are rumoured to be chasing Gov now
They are beyond a joke! There is overpaying players to meet the salary cap requirements but to then go over the salary cap... There must be some players up there getting paid massive overs
They have to pay way overs to keep or attract players. Was rumoured on SEN this morning that a kid that was only drafted a few years ago and is coming out of contract has a $400k offer to re-sign and he has told them $700k or laters.
Jim05 wrote:Unbelievable that the Suns have salary cap issues with the worst list in the comp
Cap is $12.6m and clubs are forced to pay 95% of it each year, so that only leaves a $630k buffer, wouldn't be hard to exceed if not managed correctly.
Jim05 wrote:Unbelievable that the Suns have salary cap issues with the worst list in the comp
Cap is $12.6m and clubs are forced to pay 95% of it each year, so that only leaves a $630k buffer, wouldn't be hard to exceed if not managed correctly.
Are any of us surprised the Suns are as shit as managing things off field as they are on field? Surely not....
I still don’t know why clubs are forced to pay 95% of the cap. Surely they should be able to spend what they like? And a shit club shouldn’t be forced to pay players overs just because they have to
bennymacca wrote:I still don’t know why clubs are forced to pay 95% of the cap. Surely they should be able to spend what they like? And a shit club shouldn’t be forced to pay players overs just because they have to
