Spargo wrote:So, one for the conspiracy theorists out there.
The original dates for the 2020 Olympics was July 23 (tomorrow) until August 8.
And now, in almost the exact same time frame, the AFL announces it will play 33 games of footy over the next 20 days.
I’m guessing channel 7 has booked out or sold off massive amounts of advertising time slots but with less people watching with the Olympics being put back, they have asked the AFL for assistance.
Hence the 33 games on consecutive nights over 20 days.
Coincidence or not?
*Not thought up by yours truly, sent to me last night.
Makes sense and to be honest is probably a win/win given the circumstances for both Channel 7 and the AFL.
I think the AFL would love the fact they get to trial 'mid week' football both from crowd attendances and more importantly tv ratings point of view without any pushback from the football community, clubs, players, supporters.
The NBA/EPL have built a lot of their success around having 7 days a week sport/timeslots and im sure the AFL in a perfect world would love to have more games in a season, more games on tv, larger tv rights.
Yes people will talk about player fatigue etc but in those sports 'resting' players is part and part of managing a team through a season. We are already hearing about AFL clubs resting players for the odd game.
People will also talk about mid week crowds being lower but even in the NBA and EPL the midweek fixtures tend to be the St.K vs Fremantle games and the blockbuster games are saved for the best attending timeslots. This then has limited effect on the crowd attendances but maximises tv audiences with a larger neutral viewing rate.
It would not surprise me that if this 33 games in 20 days became a massive TV success that they might not try and squeeze the 'odd' midweek game in future seasons fixtures.