AFL Round 10

Talk on the national game

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 12:35 am

I checked and yep... we've still got the 4 points :lol:
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby Booney » Tue May 25, 2021 7:35 am

MW wrote:I checked and yep... we've still got the 4 points :lol:


Exactly, so just say "It was deliberate" instead of bullshitting everyone!
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby whufc » Tue May 25, 2021 7:39 am

How do people feel though about it being deliberate if it did touch the Melbourne players hand.

For mine if you do not have the last touch you cannot be responsible for the 'deliberate' ruling regardless of how little the touch was.

Obviously we can argue about whether it was touched until the cows come home but im talking more about the hypothetical of that situation.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27453
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5565 times
Been liked: 2519 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 8:47 am

Booney wrote:
MW wrote:I checked and yep... we've still got the 4 points :lol:


Exactly, so just say "It was deliberate" instead of bullshitting everyone!


I didnt realise people cant see the touch by Spargo and thats the reason for calling it deliberate. If that's the case then I cant help you all :lol:
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 8:48 am

whufc wrote:How do people feel though about it being deliberate if it did touch the Melbourne players hand.

For mine if you do not have the last touch you cannot be responsible for the 'deliberate' ruling regardless of how little the touch was.

Obviously we can argue about whether it was touched until the cows come home but im talking more about the hypothetical of that situation.


No apparently the ruling by the AFL implies there was no touch from what I've been told.
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby Booney » Tue May 25, 2021 9:06 am

MW wrote:
Booney wrote:
MW wrote:I checked and yep... we've still got the 4 points :lol:


Exactly, so just say "It was deliberate" instead of bullshitting everyone!


I didnt realise people cant see the touch by Spargo and thats the reason for calling it deliberate. If that's the case then I cant help you all :lol:


I didn't realise the umpire could see through players in slow motion from the blindside to not call it deliberate, if that's the case then I can't help you all.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 9:15 am

singing from the same hymn book mate
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby whufc » Tue May 25, 2021 9:22 am

MW wrote:
whufc wrote:How do people feel though about it being deliberate if it did touch the Melbourne players hand.

For mine if you do not have the last touch you cannot be responsible for the 'deliberate' ruling regardless of how little the touch was.

Obviously we can argue about whether it was touched until the cows come home but im talking more about the hypothetical of that situation.


No apparently the ruling by the AFL implies there was no touch from what I've been told.


Understand that but I guess I was working on the hypothetical 'IF' he did touch. On social media yesterday there were some heated discussion around whether it could still be deliberate had the Melbourne player touched it.....personally I'm of the opinion that if the Melbourne player had the last touch regardless of how small, light whatever it could not be deliberate then.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27453
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5565 times
Been liked: 2519 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 9:23 am

Totally agree mate.
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby Senor Moto Gadili » Tue May 25, 2021 9:55 am

whufc wrote:
MW wrote:
whufc wrote:How do people feel though about it being deliberate if it did touch the Melbourne players hand.

For mine if you do not have the last touch you cannot be responsible for the 'deliberate' ruling regardless of how little the touch was.

Obviously we can argue about whether it was touched until the cows come home but im talking more about the hypothetical of that situation.


No apparently the ruling by the AFL implies there was no touch from what I've been told.


Understand that but I guess I was working on the hypothetical 'IF' he did touch. On social media yesterday there were some heated discussion around whether it could still be deliberate had the Melbourne player touched it.....personally I'm of the opinion that if the Melbourne player had the last touch regardless of how small, light whatever it could not be deliberate then.

Agreed .... can't be called for insufficient intent if another player touches it. AFL review determined that Spargo didn't touch it.
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3611
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 532 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 9:58 am

Just like JJ's goal didn't hit the post ;)
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 25, 2021 10:01 am

whufc wrote:How do people feel though about it being deliberate if it did touch the Melbourne players hand.

For mine if you do not have the last touch you cannot be responsible for the 'deliberate' ruling regardless of how little the touch was.

Obviously we can argue about whether it was touched until the cows come home but im talking more about the hypothetical of that situation.
Still deliberate

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56642
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11805 times
Been liked: 3582 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby Booney » Tue May 25, 2021 10:02 am

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Agreed .... can't be called for insufficient intent if another player touches it. AFL review determined that Spargo didn't touch it.


I'm puzzled by the argument that Spargo touched it, I've got very good vision and I can't be sure either way in slow motion and zoomed in.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 25, 2021 10:05 am

Booney wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Agreed .... can't be called for insufficient intent if another player touches it. AFL review determined that Spargo didn't touch it.


I'm puzzled by the argument that Spargo touched it, I've got very good vision and I can't be sure either way in slow motion and zoomed in.
I'm not sure he touched it.
But it can be insufficient intent if it brushes an opposition player who had little to know impact on the trajectory of the ball.


Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56642
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11805 times
Been liked: 3582 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 25, 2021 10:06 am

I'm stunned the AFL haven't clamped down on the defensive punches to the boundary line in a contest as Deliberate


Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56642
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11805 times
Been liked: 3582 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby reppoh_eht » Tue May 25, 2021 10:17 am

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I'm stunned the AFL haven't clamped down on the defensive punches to the boundary line in a contest as Deliberate


Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk


Because you are allowed to do that... In a marking contest you are free to punch/spoil the ball as deliberately as you like towards the boundary.
reppoh_eht
Under 16s
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:24 pm
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby mots02 » Tue May 25, 2021 11:14 am

Booney wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Agreed .... can't be called for insufficient intent if another player touches it. AFL review determined that Spargo didn't touch it.


I'm puzzled by the argument that Spargo touched it, I've got very good vision and I can't be sure either way in slow motion and zoomed in.


I'm puzzled why anyone would go to the trouble of finding slow motion, zoomed in vision of the incident!

Image
User avatar
mots02
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:42 pm
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 853 times
Grassroots Team: Reynella

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Tue May 25, 2021 11:15 am

mots02 wrote:
Booney wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Agreed .... can't be called for insufficient intent if another player touches it. AFL review determined that Spargo didn't touch it.


I'm puzzled by the argument that Spargo touched it, I've got very good vision and I can't be sure either way in slow motion and zoomed in.


I'm puzzled why anyone would go to the trouble of finding slow motion, zoomed in vision of the incident!

Image
Closet Crows fan perhaps??

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 56642
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 11805 times
Been liked: 3582 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby Booney » Tue May 25, 2021 11:21 am

mots02 wrote:
Booney wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Agreed .... can't be called for insufficient intent if another player touches it. AFL review determined that Spargo didn't touch it.


I'm puzzled by the argument that Spargo touched it, I've got very good vision and I can't be sure either way in slow motion and zoomed in.


I'm puzzled why anyone would go to the trouble of finding slow motion, zoomed in vision of the incident!

Image


It was the evidence all the Crowies were using across the socials, didn't have to look at all, rolled across my feed.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58211
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7467 times
Been liked: 10755 times

Re: AFL Round 10

Postby MW » Tue May 25, 2021 11:53 am

the butt hurt over this decision still is tremendous! :lol: :lol:
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12914
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2581 times
Been liked: 1822 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |