by whufc » Thu May 13, 2021 10:50 am
by amber_fluid » Thu May 13, 2021 11:07 am
whufc wrote:Channel 7 reporting Patrick Cripps has been playing with a fractured back and needing weekly injections to get through.
Surely that cant be true and if it is surely that cant be allowed even if he wants to play, we make blokes with concussion sit out 2 weeks surely you cant let a bloke play through a fractured back.
by MW » Thu May 13, 2021 11:14 am
by whufc » Thu May 13, 2021 11:19 am
MW wrote:Surely the fracture diagnosis is recent otherwise questions need to be asked
by Booney » Thu May 13, 2021 11:30 am
whufc wrote:MW wrote:Surely the fracture diagnosis is recent otherwise questions need to be asked
Yeah your probably right......maybe the media is sensationalising it.
by whufc » Thu May 13, 2021 11:35 am
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:MW wrote:Surely the fracture diagnosis is recent otherwise questions need to be asked
Yeah your probably right......maybe the media is sensationalising it.
If his form is aligned to his back then he's been playing with it for several weeks.
by MW » Thu May 13, 2021 11:36 am
by Armchair expert » Thu May 13, 2021 11:40 am
by whufc » Thu May 13, 2021 11:42 am
by Senor Moto Gadili » Thu May 13, 2021 1:30 pm
by gadj1976 » Thu May 13, 2021 9:29 pm
MW wrote:playing with it yes, but diagnosed with the fracture surely is recent otherwise the club should get smashed for letting him play
by gadj1976 » Sat Jun 19, 2021 10:52 pm
by daysofourlives » Sat Jun 19, 2021 11:28 pm
gadj1976 wrote:FMD.
We'd get beaten by Upperumbucta thirds at the moment. Our defensive structure is abhorrent.
Our defence might be individually trying but group defence is shockingly lacking. As part of the review I hope that our defensive set up is queried/reviewed and overhauled. I think overall our game plan is sound but the ability for opposition teams to mark uncontested in our F50 is second to one. They mark untouched (dare I say, bruise free?)
by Jim05 » Sun Jun 20, 2021 12:52 am
by daysofourlives » Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:03 pm
Jim05 wrote:Doesn’t help when you pay blokes a fortune that refuse to defend
by amber_fluid » Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:21 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Doesn’t help when you pay blokes a fortune that refuse to defend
Plus Jack Martin is in the top 5 paid players in the AFl, value for money there lol
by Jim05 » Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:24 pm
Martin, Williams, Saad, McGoverndaysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Doesn’t help when you pay blokes a fortune that refuse to defend
Plus Jack Martin is in the top 5 paid players in the AFl, value for money there lol
by amber_fluid » Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:27 pm
Jim05 wrote:Martin, Williams, Saad, McGoverndaysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Doesn’t help when you pay blokes a fortune that refuse to defend
Plus Jack Martin is in the top 5 paid players in the AFl, value for money there lol
There is a fair chunk of your salary cap gone right there.
Saad is the only one that is remotely worth what his output is
by gadj1976 » Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:06 pm
daysofourlives wrote:gadj1976 wrote:FMD.
We'd get beaten by Upperumbucta thirds at the moment. Our defensive structure is abhorrent.
Our defence might be individually trying but group defence is shockingly lacking. As part of the review I hope that our defensive set up is queried/reviewed and overhauled. I think overall our game plan is sound but the ability for opposition teams to mark uncontested in our F50 is second to one. They mark untouched (dare I say, bruise free?)
I think its your mids and fwds that are the problem in that case, the opposition waltz out of defence and through the midfield with no pressure, very hard for the defence to stop the hit up kick in that case. Not absolving your defence completely though, alot of attack 1st players rather than defence 1st
by Armchair expert » Sun Jun 20, 2021 9:11 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |