by Corona Man » Thu Jun 29, 2023 3:47 am
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jun 29, 2023 6:20 am
Your fault lol. You thought Head's shot was terrible, Green's was worse.daysofourlives wrote:**** me no sooner had i submitted that post and Root gets Head, stumped, terrible shot, even Bairstow couldnt f it up although he tried
by stan » Thu Jun 29, 2023 8:16 am
by Eagles2014 » Thu Jun 29, 2023 9:17 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Your fault lol. You thought Head's shot was terrible, Green's was worse.daysofourlives wrote:**** me no sooner had i submitted that post and Root gets Head, stumped, terrible shot, even Bairstow couldnt f it up although he tried
Watching the highlights Smith and Head (partnership of 117) played some brilliant shots.
83 overs bowled in the day, how much extra time did they play on top of the extra half an hour? Cricinfo commentary has stumps at 6.50pm so I'm guessing 20 mins?
5/339 at stumps, not a bad toss to lose.
Smith has reached 9000 test runs in this innings, he's the second fastest too 9000 in innings played (174).
by Booney » Thu Jun 29, 2023 9:17 am
by FlyingHigh » Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:06 am
by shoe boy » Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:56 am
by Wedgie » Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:02 am
shoe boy wrote:Why is the lords oval on a slope?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by heater31 » Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:03 am
Because laser levels weren't around in 1814!shoe boy wrote:Why is the lords oval on a slope?
by tigerpie » Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:08 am
by tigerpie » Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:10 am
heater31 wrote:Because laser levels weren't around in 1814!shoe boy wrote:Why is the lords oval on a slope?
by heater31 » Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:18 am
Nah it was built on a known hill.tigerpie wrote:heater31 wrote:Because laser levels weren't around in 1814!shoe boy wrote:Why is the lords oval on a slope?
Hahaha. English eyesight must have been pretty ordinary back then.
I've no idea why it's such a big slope .....run off maybe? Collect the water in one spot?
by am Bays » Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:23 am
heater31 wrote:Nah it was built on a known hill.tigerpie wrote:heater31 wrote:Because laser levels weren't around in 1814!shoe boy wrote:Why is the lords oval on a slope?
Hahaha. English eyesight must have been pretty ordinary back then.
I've no idea why it's such a big slope .....run off maybe? Collect the water in one spot?
Suspect it was constructed in haste as this site was the third one 4 years.
First one was abandoned due to a rent dispute in 1810 and is now known as Dorset Square, 2nd one was compulsory acquired to construct Regent's Canal in 1813
by RB » Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:03 pm
by Brodlach » Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:20 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Armchair expert » Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:22 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Jun 29, 2023 12:24 pm
Brodlach wrote:Given the average first inning s score is 197 we have been super!
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jun 29, 2023 1:49 pm
.amber_fluid wrote:
Some of Paddy’s mates perhaps
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |