I don’t know about unsafe but it was a disgrace when Norwood played theresouthee wrote:The ground was unsafe.
by Jim05 » Mon Jul 17, 2023 7:28 pm
I don’t know about unsafe but it was a disgrace when Norwood played theresouthee wrote:The ground was unsafe.
by mots02 » Mon Jul 17, 2023 7:30 pm
southee wrote:The ground was unsafe.
by saintal » Mon Jul 17, 2023 9:02 pm
another grub wrote:Brooksby has been plain. Mind on the breeding barn
by saintal » Mon Jul 17, 2023 9:11 pm
gazzamagoo wrote:Backman wrote:How can so many South players be so out of form?
These were good SANFL players last year
Brooksby is an exception, has played well all year
Really sad to watch
Had a truckload of good players leave too.
by robranisgod » Mon Jul 17, 2023 9:22 pm
saintal wrote:another grub wrote:Brooksby has been plain. Mind on the breeding barn
Brooksby could spend the next 4 games in bed and he'd still win the B+F, has been the least of South's worries.
by knowledge » Mon Jul 17, 2023 11:03 pm
mots02 wrote:southee wrote:The ground was unsafe.
Why did the game go ahead then?
by southee » Mon Jul 17, 2023 11:34 pm
by knowledge » Mon Jul 17, 2023 11:49 pm
southee wrote:When you have an oval resembling a golf course ….beach sand filling up large sections of the ground, I think you have to question if it is up to SANFL standard to play on.
Liam Fitt was tackled also into one of those sand divots on Sunday and had to have his eyes sprayed with water to get the sand out of them. He had to come off the ground blind.
Sturt didn’t even train on it all week and it still was unplayable.
Not sure if sturt can work out if it’s an sanfl playing oval or a recreational/public dog park ???
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |