Booney wrote:whufc wrote:am Bays wrote:No Cummins is right Warner did bat well at Lords, he is one of the reason why we won that test, two opening partnerships that lasted at least 20 overs.
He was poor at Leeds and OK at Edgebaston.
The question is who do you replace him with. The fact there was no tour game to see if Renshaw or Harris were viable options to replace his arguably what saved him.
Bottom line he has to step up this test and next or he isn’t getting his farewell test.
He is averaging 28 for the series he is not going really well.
What are Smith and Labuschagne averaging? ( It's 31 and 24 )
Yep and we all agree they have been poor, not going "really well'
Which proves the point further. Smith and Laba are widely accepted as having a poor series. The fact that David average 28 is considered him going really well shows how far the bloke has fallen and how low the standard has dropped. Or he is purely undroppable for some info he may have.