locky801 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Relying on Fraudmantle to get 7/7
I feel ill![]()
![]()
boom!
locky801 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Relying on Fraudmantle to get 7/7
I feel ill![]()
![]()
Imagine having that highly paid plonker leading a young teamArmchair expert wrote:0 Kicks
0 Handballs
0 Marks
0 Tackles
5 Frees Against
Solid first half for Tom
mots02 wrote:Imagine having that highly paid plonker leading a young teamArmchair expert wrote:0 Kicks
0 Handballs
0 Marks
0 Tackles
5 Frees Against
Solid first half for Tom
10 seconds before that he deliberately knees Worrell in the marking contestDOC wrote:mots02 wrote:Imagine having that highly paid plonker leading a young teamArmchair expert wrote:0 Kicks
0 Handballs
0 Marks
0 Tackles
5 Frees Against
Solid first half for Tom
Fox Footy reporting that there is also vision of him raking his boot across Josh Worrel’s face.
Dunno what happened with my tips, it had me as missing two games and selected Sydney instead of the Dogs on the Friday game.Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Relying on Fraudmantle to get 7/7
I feel ill![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
boom!
Has to be but knowing the AFL will not be.Booney wrote:Lynch, straight to the tribunal and 5 weeks?
I was thinking a straight trip and 4, close enoughBooney wrote:Lynch, straight to the tribunal and 5 weeks?
Agreed, he's always had a bit of a sniper element to his game but yesterday it was way over the top.MW wrote:Has to be but knowing the AFL will not be.Booney wrote:Lynch, straight to the tribunal and 5 weeks?
They will take the easy way out and grade it accordingly which will get 2 weeks maximum.
If they actually look at Lynch for the entire first half, there are 3-4 other incidents that need looking at.
Buckley said on SEN this morning that Lynch was one of the very few still playing who will happily try & hurt an opposition player…Trader wrote:Agreed, he's always had a bit of a sniper element to his game but yesterday it was way over the top.MW wrote:Has to be but knowing the AFL will not be.Booney wrote:Lynch, straight to the tribunal and 5 weeks?
They will take the easy way out and grade it accordingly which will get 2 weeks maximum.
If they actually look at Lynch for the entire first half, there are 3-4 other incidents that need looking at.
Give it 8, get that shit stamped out once and for all.Booney wrote:Lynch, straight to the tribunal and 5 weeks?
Not sure where they keep the elephant.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I assume council still haven't fixed pot holes?Corona Man wrote:Was there yesterday. Can confirm. Ordinary.woodublieve12 wrote:Looks alright. How's Arden street looking?Spargo wrote:SCG looking in good nick again…
Was that before or after Campbell Brown broke May's jaw?Booney wrote:Wasn't actually all that long ago that Tom Lynch and Steven May were the co-captains of the Gold Coast Suns.
That place must have been lawless for a while there.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Give him 4 for the incidentBrodlach wrote:Lynch sent straight to the tribunal
I'm worried. They've become predictable.Booney wrote:Lynch, straight to the tribunal and 5 weeks?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 215 guests