by Adelaide Hawk » Sun May 16, 2010 1:10 pm
by FlyingHigh » Mon May 17, 2010 9:13 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Biggest disappointments:
- Only 2 flags in the decade where we had the talent to do so much more
- The truncated careers of Tim McNeil and Richard Anderson
by nickname » Mon May 17, 2010 9:36 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon May 17, 2010 10:17 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Which years do you think "got away" AH?
1983?
What do you think was lacking from the Legs in these years?
Why didn't McNeil and Anderson go on with their footy?
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon May 17, 2010 10:21 pm
nickname wrote:Great 80s side AH. And good to see you chose an All-Australian full back. I'd like to think Meuret or Luders could squeeze in but can't complain about any of your selections.
by Magpiespower » Tue May 18, 2010 7:43 am
FlyingHigh wrote:Port scraped into the double chance because Woodville lost the last round in 1986, but didn't Port play Norwood in the last round? Would have Norwood finished 3rd if they had have won?
by JK » Tue May 18, 2010 12:04 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Which years do you think "got away" AH?
1983?
What do you think was lacking from the Legs in these years?
Why didn't McNeil and Anderson go on with their footy?
I don't think any "got away", I was just saying we had the talent to win more than 2 flags. When you consider the number of rookies in our 82 side, we thought maybe they would carry us through to a few more flags. Certainly not 1983, West Adelaide were brilliant that year.
What was lacking? Just Norwood being Norwood. We've never been a hungry football club. Win a flag and that will do us for a few years. Balmey did a good job with Norwood in the first half of the 80s, but I don't think he got anywhere near enough out of them in the second half.
Tim McNeil was a sensational player but received a career ending injury. Anderson wasn't as committed to the cause of league football as one would hope. In the short time he played, he won one B&F, he was a class act.
by robranisgod » Tue May 18, 2010 1:00 pm
Magpiespower wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Port scraped into the double chance because Woodville lost the last round in 1986, but didn't Port play Norwood in the last round? Would have Norwood finished 3rd if they had have won?
Norwood had to win to guarantee a finals spot. A ten goal second quarter pretty much did that. Central lost to North anyway so the Legs were safe regardless.
But they couldn't get the double chance because both Port and Woodville entered round 22 with 13-8 records.
Norwood sat fifth on 11-10.
by JK » Tue May 18, 2010 1:34 pm
robranisgod wrote:Magpiespower wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Port scraped into the double chance because Woodville lost the last round in 1986, but didn't Port play Norwood in the last round? Would have Norwood finished 3rd if they had have won?
Norwood had to win to guarantee a finals spot. A ten goal second quarter pretty much did that. Central lost to North anyway so the Legs were safe regardless.
But they couldn't get the double chance because both Port and Woodville entered round 22 with 13-8 records.
Norwood sat fifth on 11-10.
I have always thought that if Port and Woodville won, the Bays would have missed out on the double chance. I also thought that if Central won, Norwood would have been unable to claim fifth spot.
by sapaul » Tue May 18, 2010 3:21 pm
by Hondo » Tue May 18, 2010 3:31 pm
by on the rails » Tue May 18, 2010 4:30 pm
hondo71 wrote:How different it may have been for North that year if Glenelg had to start from the Elimination Final!
by FlyingHigh » Tue May 18, 2010 4:45 pm
sapaul wrote:1986
Ladder after Round 21
North 30
Port 26
Woodville 26
Glenelg 24
Central 23
Norwood 22
Sturt 18
West 16
South 13
Torrens 12
Round 22
North def Central
Glenelg def Sturt
South def Woodville
Norwood def Port
West def Torrens
Final Ladder
North 32
Glenelg 26
Port 26
Woodville 26
Norwood 24
Central 23
West 18
Sturt 18
South 15
Torrens 12
by GWW » Tue May 18, 2010 5:21 pm
by robranisgod » Tue May 18, 2010 5:53 pm
GWW wrote:From memory, North were pretty strong favourites for both 85 and 86 GF's?
In one of these GF's, did North have a reasonable lead at quarter time, only to be overwhelmed by the Bays, who kicked big totals in both games? At least 20 goals in one of the GF's I reckon..
This is mainly from memory of being at the games as a 13/14 year old, and maybe only a little bit of subsequent tv footage and probably a tiny bit of discussion on this site as well.
With the same clubs playing in 3 consecutive grand finals, they all tend to meld into one game in my memory, although 87 is a little easier to remember with Parsons' dominant display and the realisation from the crowd that North had finally come to play and were a match for the Bays in the premiership decider.
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue May 18, 2010 5:54 pm
GWW wrote:From memory, North were pretty strong favourites for both 85 and 86 GF's?
by Magpiespower » Wed May 19, 2010 6:38 am
by Strawb » Wed May 19, 2010 8:05 pm
by RUSure » Wed May 19, 2010 11:28 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |