SA Footy

mots02 wrote:

Booney wrote:3 games for Wines?

Is there a secret alternate angle the haven’t shown to the public?

Used to be the secret Laura Kane angle, which has now been renamed to Greg Swann.

AFL set to investigate alleged offensive slur made by an Adelaide player towards Collingwood opponent.

"This masthead understands the league is likely to become involved in an alleged vilification case as a result of an on-field comment during the emotion-charged Adelaide Oval clash."

Armchair expert wrote:AFL set to investigate alleged offensive slur made by an Adelaide player towards Collingwood opponent.

"This masthead understands the league is likely to become involved in an alleged vilification case as a result of an on-field comment during the emotion-charged Adelaide Oval clash."

Allegedly a homophobic slur

It's Rankine

big test for the AFL, precedent is 5 weeks but a big name player and finals on the horizon lets hope he's innocent.

Jim05 wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:AFL set to investigate alleged offensive slur made by an Adelaide player towards Collingwood opponent.

"This masthead understands the league is likely to become involved in an alleged vilification case as a result of an on-field comment during the emotion-charged Adelaide Oval clash."

Allegedly a homophobic slur

Royal Commission pending.

On the other hand, if you take drugs … nothing to see here.

Jim05 wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:AFL set to investigate alleged offensive slur made by an Adelaide player towards Collingwood opponent.

"This masthead understands the league is likely to become involved in an alleged vilification case as a result of an on-field comment during the emotion-charged Adelaide Oval clash."

Allegedly a homophobic slur

AFL keep lifting the penalty so would be up to 5 games if guilty, season over

This corrupt mob suspending a big name out of finals fir a slur?

Finlayson got 5 didn’t he?
If proven then I think Rankine is looking at similar

Booney wrote:This corrupt mob suspending a big name out of finals fir a slur?

Rankine plays for a non Victorian based team, no?

Deserves what he gets. No different to a racial slur

Arch44 wrote:Deserves what he gets. No different to a racial slur

Fully agree, you’d think he would known better. If proven correct

Jim05 wrote:Finlayson got 5 didn’t he?
If proven then I think Rankine is looking at similar

He'll get 3 if found guilty, allowing him to return for the GF if they make it. Although I thought that with Houston last year and they put him out of contention full stop.

With the site being so slow I can only assume Booneys bombshell dropped?

Armchair expert wrote:With the site being so slow I can only assume Booneys bombshell dropped?

More chance of the Epstein files being released

wenchbarwer wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:With the site being so slow I can only assume Booneys bombshell dropped?

More chance of the Epstein files being released

wenchbarwer wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:With the site being so slow I can only assume Booneys bombshell dropped?

More chance of the Epstein files being released

Just becasue a man says he's gonna do something in a couple of weeks doesn't mean he needs to be reminded every 3 months.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

wenchbarwer wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:With the site being so slow I can only assume Booneys bombshell dropped?

More chance of the Epstein files being released

Just becasue a man says he's gonna do something in a couple of weeks doesn't mean he needs to be reminded every 3 months.

Been talking to my wife again?

So how many matches does he get? I bet the AFL are piss weak and he gets two maximum.

Bum Crack wrote:So how many matches does he get? I bet the AFL are piss weak and he gets two maximum.

4 and 5 weeks given in the AFL with the bloke who self reported getting the 4. VFL player got 6.
I just can’t see him getting less than 4 if found guilty

I also think what he actually said should be taken in account