Page 62 of 91
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 10:11 am
by Armchair expert
He was singing a snoop song
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 10:21 am
by Brodlach
Armchair expert wrote:He was singing a snoop song
Said that yesterday are reading the lyrics of a song that says the word numerous times.
AFL can’t have it both ways.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 10:22 am
by PatowalongaPirate
Booney wrote:Feels like Farrell and Houston out last year, two key players from the same line at the same time.
Can you cover Rachele? Yes.
Can you cover Rankine? Yes.
Can you cover both? Makes it hard.
They have already shown they can cover Rachele, but I do not think they can cover Rankine even if Rachele was available.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 10:36 am
by whufc
Brodlach wrote:Armchair expert wrote:He was singing a snoop song
Said that yesterday are reading the lyrics of a song that says the word numerous times.
AFL can’t have it both ways.
Completely agree.
I'm on board with the AFL's stance against players using racial or homophobic slurs, society stance against this behavior is one of the positives in the moder world.
I hate the Crows as much as anyone around, but their fans have a right to be livid that their player may be sitting in the stands not playing on grand final day whilst Snoop Dogg is spitting in the mic. As would any other teams fans in the same situation.
The AFL is an absolute joke!! Someone needs to make them accountable and answer the questions as to how they can justify Snoop Dogg given his history.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 11:22 am
by Jimmy_041
DOC wrote:Sounds like you are very worried about playing Adelaide Jim.
I think the AFL should treat this the same as if he jumped in the air and ended a blokes career.
Sounds like you are full of $hit
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 11:49 am
by Dutchy
Brodlach wrote:
AFL can’t have it both ways.
They are world class at it
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:14 pm
by Jimmy_041
Dutchy wrote:Brodlach wrote:
AFL can’t have it both ways.
They are world class at it
The Weakest Link
- Fwit.PNG (115.71 KiB) Viewed 4771 times
Then again, his boss is probably worse
Get rid of both of them + the 4th umpire
Seen the push in the back on Maynard?
4 umpires missed it even though Walker could / should get games
PS: I am a Tex Walker fan but the push in the back free has been completely thrown out the window
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:21 pm
by Trader
Brodlach wrote:Armchair expert wrote:He was singing a snoop song
Said that yesterday are reading the lyrics of a song that says the word numerous times.
AFL can’t have it both ways.
Extremely unlucky for the AFL here.
Absolutely no one could have possibly foreseen this contradictory stance from the AFL coming back to make them look stupid.
Rewind one week:
Trader wrote:I'm not against the dogg, but equally, I do find it a bit peculiar that the AFL is an organisation that fines people $20,000 for saying c0cksucker, pretending to be an aeroplane, or calling someone black, yet they then go and give $8m to a bloke who doesn't have a single song without the word n!gger in it; actively promotes drug use and gang violence. He's also been charged with murder, albeit he got off, and has been accused of homophobia in the past.
Like I said, I don't have a problem with him, but given the AFL's constant virtue signalling, their willingness to turn a blind eye to Snoop's questionable antics does the AFL no favours.
Hmm, ok, perhaps it wasn't unforeseeable.
Anyway, still unlucky for them.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:45 pm
by Jimmy_041
Trader wrote:
Extremely unlucky for the AFL here.
Absolutely no one could have possibly foreseen this contradictory stance from the AFL coming back to make them look stupid.
Hmm, ok, perhaps it wasn't unforeseeable.
Anyway, still unlucky for them.
Absolute BS
He has used evey possible $hite word in the urban dictionary
The general public (that listen to him) copy him but he doesn't care because he makes millions out of it
They made their bed with a $hit decision
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:50 pm
by Booney
So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:53 pm
by Brodlach
Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
Let him off with a warning
Three for me
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:55 pm
by wenchbarwer
Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
Let him off with a warning
Three for me
Which one is the joke answer here??
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 12:58 pm
by dedja
Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
No
Non
Nein
Nee
Nyet
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:01 pm
by Spargo
Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
I reckon they give him 6.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:04 pm
by dedja
Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
I reckon they give him 6.
And they’ll write him a letter telling him how angry they are.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:04 pm
by Booney
Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
Let him off with a warning
Three for me
We know that.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:05 pm
by Booney
Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
I reckon they give him 6.
I still think they'll let him play the GF somehow.
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:12 pm
by wenchbarwer
Booney wrote:Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
I reckon they give him 6.
I still think they'll let him play the GF somehow.
This could exceed the number of reviews Laura Kane did when Schulz got knocked out if the AFL give him 3
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:12 pm
by Spargo
I’m still staggered Walker wasn’t even sighted for his push on Maynard…
Re: AFL 2025
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:18 pm
by wenchbarwer
Spargo wrote:I’m still staggered Walker wasn’t even sighted for his push on Maynard…
Oh I saw it, thought it was worth a citation too