Page 12 of 130
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:10 pm
by marbles
morell wrote:excuse me but Troy Elbourn is a picture of fitness and health and will be leading the Para Hills ruck in the A Grade with aplomb.
Hook and Van Den Brink are both A Grade too. Nguyen as well. Tratas played D3R and was in the best 50% of the time, he'd play D7 A Grade.
Again, their list, right now, is probably middle to bottom end of D6-ish and top end of D7. If that is their list come round 1, I'd be fine with it.
troy has never played agrade for PH in the last 4 years if ever
http://websites.sportstg.com/team_info.cgi?action=PSTATS&pID=194360104&client=0-114-109841-315143-21095607van den brink has never played agrade for para hills, and anyone could get an agrade game at mitchell park
http://websites.sportstg.com/team_info.cgi?action=PSTATS&pID=194360104&client=0-114-109841-315143-21095607stop telling lies all the time
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:16 pm
by The Bedge
marbles wrote:anyone could get an agrade game at mitchell park
- correct.jpg (9.57 KiB) Viewed 5776 times
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:25 pm
by morell
Hahahah I know Troy, I was extracting the urine because I know he reads this. Hi Elbows! Can you believe what this mook is saying about you. Heresy! A gun in his day but yes, well past A Grade footy.
Van Den Brink is a pretty good player. If he played A Grade footy (and played well) in D6 for us I am pretty sure he'd be able to cut it at Para Hills if they're truly rebuilding. Hes not exactly the committed type, so playing A Grade at D4/5 level would be tough.
Of course if hes playing B Grade then my point would be even more valid yeah?
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:52 pm
by marbles
you are convoluting your own argument with invalid evidence to push para hills out of the way to enhance youre own chances of the flag
the focus of the publics concern is that "para hills
may have too many div 4/5 competent players" NOT para hills may have some just competent div 7 players
if they have competent div 7 players then WHO CARES, because this is hardly a concern, and these players should NOT be included in your argument because your aiming to tear another undeserving club away from div 6 because van den brink might do ok at div 7 after playing div 6 mitchell park agrade?
keep your outrage to div 4/5 competent players only please
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:43 pm
by Milly
Cant believe this is still going.
If the MP coach has came out and said its is fine and looking for forward to the challenge, then that should be enough.
The MP coach spent a fair amount of time at PH and would know a lot more about the PH players than someone who spent 18 weeks with them, coaching the B grade but not even hanging around for all the A grade games.
Good luck to PH and i really think its time to move on or we just going to piss and moan until you get what u want.
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:00 pm
by The Bedge
Can D7 thread reach 50 pages before the season starts?
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:02 pm
by BZB27
Zartan wrote:Can D7 thread reach 50 pages before the season starts?
Im sure it will if Morrel and Marbles keep going haha
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:22 pm
by morell
marbles wrote:you are convoluting your own argument with invalid evidence to push para hills out of the way to enhance youre own chances of the flag
the focus of the publics concern is that "para hills
may have too many div 4/5 competent players" NOT para hills may have some just competent div 7 players
if they have competent div 7 players then WHO CARES, because this is hardly a concern, and these players should NOT be included in your argument because your aiming to tear another undeserving club away from div 6 because van den brink might do ok at div 7 after playing div 6 mitchell park agrade?
keep your outrage to div 4/5 competent players only please
I'm not sure how many times I need to post this for you muppets to get it through your thick **** ing skulls:
morell wrote:Again, their list, right now, is probably middle to bottom end of D6-ish and top end of D7. If that is their list come round 1, I'd be fine with it.
morell wrote:So say it's 9? Nearly 50% of a D4 side and it's the 7th of November. As I said - if they stopped now and rounded out their side with oldies and reasonable B Graders and they'd still be the team to beat IMO. If they keep adding recruits it'll be Smithfield '14, Salisbury West '16 levels of dominance.
So again and again and again, their squad right now is probably a very good D7 squad and I have no strong objection to them staying in D7 other than a philosophical one that I think they should be playing higher for their own good. However, it is the 15th of November. Of course they're going to be adding to that before round 1.
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:34 pm
by morell
Milly wrote:Cant believe this is still going.
If the MP coach has came out and said its is fine and looking for forward to the challenge, then that should be enough.
The MP coach spent a fair amount of time at PH and would know a lot more about the PH players than someone who spent 18 weeks with them, coaching the B grade but not even hanging around for all the A grade games.
Good luck to PH and i really think its time to move on or we just going to piss and moan until you get what u want.
I cant believe people post "i cant believe its still going" and in turn .. keep it going.
Exactly, which is why I've been saying Mitchell Park as a footy club couldn't give a fat rats. Lynchy or Davo or Wayne wouldn't have given it more than a split second thought. I know what their intentions are, what they're building and how they're doing it. Been trying to say that all along.
but nahhhhh its all a big, cooked up conspiracy to get Mitchell Park another D7 flag. Even though at this early stage I think we'd be going well if we made the 5. And I dont speak for Mitchell Park. I am washed up hack with no formal role at the club.
And really? Pissing and moaning? By discussing who is playing where and the standards therein?
Facts are, players and coaches involved in D7 agree with me - if not publicly than certainly privately... So do a couple of people at the admin. Even **** ing Para Hills people agree with me.
Just a matter of trying to work a solution. Which is what was being discussed until the muppetry of safooty reared its ugly head once again.
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:47 pm
by marbles
Milly did u just login to have a little vent? A little cry baby vent? "Dont wanna talk about this anymore"
Fact is theres a juggernaut building and you can ban discussion of it here but there is a possible div 7 monster growing each and every day out there
So far its looking ok no concerns but they do have about 8 div 4/5 quality footballers right now plus another 40 unknowns and its only november. That already resembles the div 7 smithfield side of a few years ago
In 2 months time morrels concerns will likely be warranted and a solution will be needed. Thats ok just a solution is needed
Let the discussion continue towards a solution if its needed
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:57 pm
by Milly
How about we just let the administrators at HQ do there job?
We all the players went back to Brahma Lodge after winning a grand final and dropping back 2 grades did we piss and moan than?
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:01 pm
by The Bedge
Milly wrote:We all the players went back to Brahma Lodge after winning a grand final and dropping back 2 grades did we piss and moan than?
We did a little..
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:04 pm
by morell
Milly wrote:How about we just let the administrators at HQ do there job?
We all the players went back to Brahma Lodge after winning a grand final and dropping back 2 grades did we piss and moan than?
Ahhhh yeah! and that was pissing and moaning.
and the difference with BL was they were trying to stay alive and agreed to play at the standard that was suitable - which was D6.
Completely different to Para Hills (again, through no fault of their own)
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:18 pm
by The Bedge
morell wrote:and the difference with BL was they were trying to stay alive and agreed to play at the standard that was suitable - which was D6.
Completely different to Para Hills (again, through no fault of their own)
Not sure they agreed to play lower, but rather requested.. and i think many would argue that it was through fault of their own..
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:29 pm
by morell
Zartan wrote:morell wrote:and the difference with BL was they were trying to stay alive and agreed to play at the standard that was suitable - which was D6.
Completely different to Para Hills (again, through no fault of their own)
Not sure they agreed to play lower, but rather requested.. and i think many would argue that it was through fault of their own..
Yeah sure, but at least that was an appropriate standard for them.
Where did they finish? 7th wasn't it?
and I meant where they are placed isn't their fault.
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:34 pm
by The Bedge
morell wrote:Where did they finish? 7th wasn't it?
Lower than many predicted prior to the season.. perhaps Para Hills will finish lower than expected also..
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:49 pm
by morell
Zartan wrote:morell wrote:Where did they finish? 7th wasn't it?
Lower than many predicted prior to the season.. perhaps Para Hills will finish lower than expected also..
If Para Hills finish 7th or lower I will give my account details to marbles and never step digital foot in sa footy ever again.
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:07 pm
by marbles
morell wrote:Zartan wrote:morell wrote:Where did they finish? 7th wasn't it?
Lower than many predicted prior to the season.. perhaps Para Hills will finish lower than expected also..
If Para Hills finish 7th or lower I will give my account details to marbles and never step digital foot in sa footy ever again.
morells myths will be mine!!!
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:44 pm
by Minion Master
morell wrote:Milly wrote:How about we just let the administrators at HQ do there job?
We all the players went back to Brahma Lodge after winning a grand final and dropping back 2 grades did we piss and moan than?
Ahhhh yeah! and that was pissing and moaning.
and the difference with BL was they were trying to stay alive and agreed to play at the standard that was suitable - which was D6.
Completely different to Para Hills (again, through no fault of their own)
so....if it's not Para Hills fault for the predicament they are in, then whose fault is it?
Re: Ch9AFL Division 7 - 2017
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:52 pm
by mighty hounds
Minion Master wrote:morell wrote:Milly wrote:How about we just let the administrators at HQ do there job?
We all the players went back to Brahma Lodge after winning a grand final and dropping back 2 grades did we piss and moan than?
Ahhhh yeah! and that was pissing and moaning.
and the difference with BL was they were trying to stay alive and agreed to play at the standard that was suitable - which was D6.
Completely different to Para Hills (again, through no fault of their own)
so....if it's not Para Hills fault for the predicament they are in, then whose fault is it?
it's morells fault