Port Adelaide 2016

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:49 pm

Krakouer would start on a flank before Hartlett or DBJ, IMO.
Krakouer is the only person in the back half who has an elite leg so he has to start.

UK Fan · Post by **UK Fan** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 2:25 pm

Booney wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:@Booney

How will Port line up in round 1 in your eyess mate?

Wingard Dixon Young
Monfries Westhoff Palmer
Ebert Wines Impey
Hartlett Trengove Byrne-Jones
Pittard Hombsch Austin

Foll : Ryder Boak Gray

Int from - Snelling, Jonas, Bonner, Clurey, S.Gray, Krakouer, Ah Chee...etc.

Interesting no: White Polac Lobbe or Broadbent listed in best 25

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 2:26 pm

UK Fan wrote:
Booney wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:@Booney

How will Port line up in round 1 in your eyess mate?

Wingard Dixon Young
Monfries Westhoff Palmer
Ebert Wines Impey
Hartlett Trengove Byrne-Jones
Pittard Hombsch Austin

Foll : Ryder Boak Gray

Int from - Snelling, Jonas, Bonner, Clurey, S.Gray, Krakouer, Ah Chee...etc.

Interesting no: White Polac Lobbe or Broadbent listed in best 25

Shite too.

regards,

REB

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Wed Oct 19, 2016 2:41 pm

Spargo wrote:
Booney wrote:Our trade history is not bad, Schulz, Ryder, Ebert, Monfries, Polec, White, Hombsch, Dixon....they've all been additions that improved us.

Our talent identification and development isn't anywhere near as good as it should have been though, no doubting that.

Polec

White just as bad IMO

Always injured

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:30 am

That is shaping as a bottom 4 team imo. Unless they get some serious improvement from I don't know where

Post by **RustyCage** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:53 am

Maybe we'll have plenty of "organic growth"

batmanbegins · Post by **batmanbegins** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:37 am

No chance port are a bottom 4 side, they still have some really good players. Gray and wingard are elite and will win some games themselves against weaker sides. If everything goes right i think the can make the bottom half of the 8 but i think they will end up 9th or 10th again. When you lose important games to weak sides like they have over the past few years it suggests something is not entirley right.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:11 pm

Wonder would Port be interested in Chris Dawes as a delisted free agent to give another key forward to enable Westhoff to play other than key forward ( ie half forward / wing where I think he could be damaging ) and to let Ryder play as 3rd tall forward when resting from ruck

MW · Post by MW » Sat Oct 22, 2016 5:44 pm

Probably not cause Dawes is shit

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:06 pm

MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit

Yep, Port could find dozens of players in country comps better than that dud

carey · Post by **carey** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:20 pm

bennymacca wrote:That is shaping as a bottom 4 team imo. Unless they get some serious improvement from I don't know where

Bottom 4

Maybe take the Red,blue and Yellow glasses off and have another look.

MW · Post by MW » Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:29 pm

They are not bottom 4. Once again they will be one of 10 sides (crows incl) playing for 5th to 8th.

carey · Post by **carey** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 10:16 pm

MW wrote:They are not bottom 4. Once again they will be one of 10 sides (crows incl) playing for 5th to 8th.

Agreed. I have Port 7th-10th range.

I except big improvement from Freo, Saints and Melbourne. Can't fit them in in tho. Injuries and the close games will be huge. (Hawks won about 6 under 2 goals)

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Oct 22, 2016 11:29 pm

Playing the Swans at the SCG in round 1, ouch!

Post by **Dutchy** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:38 pm

Jim05 wrote:
MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit

Yep, Port could find dozens of players in country comps better than that dud

Brett Eddy according to Kane Cornes

carey · Post by **carey** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:21 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit

Yep, Port could find dozens of players in country comps better than that dud

Brett Eddy according to Kane Cornes

I'd prefer Eddie to Dawes

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:22 pm

carey wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit

Yep, Port could find dozens of players in country comps better than that dud

Brett Eddy according to Kane Cornes

I'd prefer Eddie to Dawes

I'd take Steady Eddy over Dawes

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:24 pm

Back to 'The Future' maybe.

They wouldn't would they.

carey · Post by **carey** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:31 pm

amber_fluid wrote:Back to 'The Future' maybe.
They wouldn't would they.

No chance

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:42 pm

carey wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit

Yep, Port could find dozens of players in country comps better than that dud

Brett Eddy according to Kane Cornes

I'd prefer Eddie to Dawes

As in McGuire??

Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

Who is online