HFL Division 1 (Central)
-
leather poisoning
- Mini-League
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:36 am
- Location: greenhill
- Contact:
- devilsadvocate
- Coach
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:28 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
leather poisoning wrote:Ironbank looking to give the premiership a shake with an influx of stars - you gotta be kidding me, seriously that is the dumbest thing put on this thread without doubt - and I've said some dumb shit.
On a country note, Kangarilla shouldnt be bothered - will give you credit for that one though
-
Fitness First
- Mini-League
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:35 pm
- Contact:
- devilsadvocate
- Coach
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:28 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
-
Mop Up
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 2052
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:35 pm
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
hahahahahahahahaha. i luv it how u guys make a comment and bcos u made it, it must be true. cos u guys won all three premierships so you must know what your talking about. us other forum goers are only here to bow down to ur football knowledge.
Mt Lofty were a very very very good B Grade side but thats what they are. A b grade side. to say they would deal wit IB and shanty comfortably is rediculous.
As for IB pushing for premiership. thats a lil far fetched even to an IB supporter. some very good recruits and improved development from the loads of rookies should see a rise up the ladder. but lets not go that far
Mt Lofty were a very very very good B Grade side but thats what they are. A b grade side. to say they would deal wit IB and shanty comfortably is rediculous.
As for IB pushing for premiership. thats a lil far fetched even to an IB supporter. some very good recruits and improved development from the loads of rookies should see a rise up the ladder. but lets not go that far
Last edited by Mop Up on Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- devilsadvocate
- Coach
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:28 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
- devilsadvocate
- Coach
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:28 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
-
magpie in the 80's
- Coach
- Posts: 35440
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:56 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Location: in the quiz books
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 27 times
- Contact:
devilsadvocate wrote:FF - Will Maccy be close considering the Mt Barker influx similar to Nairne?
DA talking to orddoubleblues maccy can only recruit 3 players from one club. hills league rule. he thinks maccy around the middle of the field
I went to a fight the other night, and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield (1921 - 2004)
- ORDoubleBlues
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Wisanger
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
To be honest I think Maccy can only expect a mid range finish at best (between 6th and 10th).
If the league is sticking to their guns regarding the "3 player rule", Michael Foster is the only player that Maccy will be able to recruit as Murphy and Harford will already count as two. I think this rule is ridiculous when it is between divisions, espescially going from Central to Country. I can understand that the league doesn't want another Garry Hughes Gumeracha/Torrens Valley situation but that was in the same division after all.
I'm tipping that Nairne will find a way to underachieve again and they will only finish 5th at best.
If the league is sticking to their guns regarding the "3 player rule", Michael Foster is the only player that Maccy will be able to recruit as Murphy and Harford will already count as two. I think this rule is ridiculous when it is between divisions, espescially going from Central to Country. I can understand that the league doesn't want another Garry Hughes Gumeracha/Torrens Valley situation but that was in the same division after all.
I'm tipping that Nairne will find a way to underachieve again and they will only finish 5th at best.
-
Loves to slot one
- Rookie
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:39 pm
- Contact:
johnnycash wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:2words wrote:I think that both divisions would have some great players. However the last 10 players picked in a div 1 side compared to the last 10 players in a div 2 side would be were the difference is. Im tipping the last 10 players in div 1 would have more ability then the last 10 players picked in div 2, hence the difference in standard between the 2 divisions.
Does anyone have any thoughts in regards to my theory?
Or in our case, the last 10 players picked in the B's have more ability than the last 10 picked in a Div 2 A grade side!!!!
doubt it.
i do agree about the last 10 theory in div 1 and div 2 side.
majority of the stars in div 2 would also be stars in div 1 in the right side.
westley is a great example... top player at kersbrook... top player at loby... top player back at kersbrook.
JC from kersbrook....Westley was one of about 8 SUPERSTARS in that side...would have only just been top 5 in that team. That Loby side chopper was in would pump Kersbrook...even with all their new boys
-
ronburgandy
- Under 16s
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: with your mum
- Contact:
da your super b's include allot of players who prev played a grade. remember they were the players in the team that shanty were beating only 3 years ago. the good ones playing than are still in a grade while others are now in b grade, gts notiably. to say ur super b's are that good and would beat half the div 1 side is a bit over the top. yes there are some good players in b grade but there playing against other b grade sides. i think they would give shanty and ib a run but doubt they would win.
- devilsadvocate
- Coach
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:28 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
ronburgandy wrote:da your super b's include allot of players who prev played a grade. remember they were the players in the team that shanty were beating only 3 years ago. the good ones playing than are still in a grade while others are now in b grade, gts notiably. to say ur super b's are that good and would beat half the div 1 side is a bit over the top. yes there are some good players in b grade but there playing against other b grade sides. i think they would give shanty and ib a run but doubt they would win.
I'll pay that. Pretty accurate summary. I said some stupidly over the top crap today!!! I do think we would have beaten Shanty and IB last year though.
Last years Super B's would have beaten our A grade side from '04. Trust me I was part of both!
GTS will be shattered with you labelling him an 'other'!!!!!
-
FootyMad
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:43 pm
- ORDoubleBlues
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:36 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Wisanger
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
For another spin on the Central/Country divisions, there are obviously some clubs and players that are happy being big fish in little ponds.
For example...........
For those of us old enough to remember, Echunga had a fantastic side in '95 and '96 that went undefeated in Country and was led by the man with Ablett syndrome (Michael Aish) and had fine recruits from town including guys like Barnaby Gasket as well as home grown talent like the Young brothers, sniper Curnow and Pecker Rothe. They had a side that was capable of finishing mid range in Central (as they did late '80's/early '90's.) but guess what happened when they went to Central? All the players left and Echunga was forced to play guys in Central A grade who were only Country B graders the year before and they consequently got flogged in '97 and didn't win a game. A similar thing happened to Maccy in the Early '80's and I venture to say that the same would happen if (hypothetically) Kangarilla went Central in '08 or if Meadows went central in '08.
For example...........
For those of us old enough to remember, Echunga had a fantastic side in '95 and '96 that went undefeated in Country and was led by the man with Ablett syndrome (Michael Aish) and had fine recruits from town including guys like Barnaby Gasket as well as home grown talent like the Young brothers, sniper Curnow and Pecker Rothe. They had a side that was capable of finishing mid range in Central (as they did late '80's/early '90's.) but guess what happened when they went to Central? All the players left and Echunga was forced to play guys in Central A grade who were only Country B graders the year before and they consequently got flogged in '97 and didn't win a game. A similar thing happened to Maccy in the Early '80's and I venture to say that the same would happen if (hypothetically) Kangarilla went Central in '08 or if Meadows went central in '08.
-
ronburgandy
- Under 16s
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: with your mum
- Contact:
FootyMad wrote:
Anyone know of Scotty Byrt getting offered big coin to return to play for Mt Barker. Is he handy, apparently played semi pro in the geelong league last year.
played football with 2 players from that league last year in nsw and one had won the league b and f. honestly was not that good. the league is very overated. dragecevics (ex afl now west) brother played for shanty few years ago and also was meant to be a allright player in that league and couldn't get a kick in the hills. but if you say this bloke is returning home may have prev played hills football and could be allright.
-
ronburgandy
- Under 16s
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:34 am
- Location: with your mum
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests
